Bridge 2 Load Rating Table.pdf

PDF 222 KB Posted

Attached to
Bridge 2 Structural Repairs, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME
Solicitation number
N4008523R2622
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a bridge load rating report and related federal contract opportunity. The bridge load rating report evaluates Bridge 2 at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine under various vehicle load scenarios before and after proposed repairs. It provides inventory and operating rating factors and load ratings in tons for several vehicles including the HL-93 design vehicle, HS-20 design vehicle, H-20 design vehicle, and several special hauling vehicles. The controlling structural members are identified for each rating.

The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number N4008523R2622 for bridge structural repairs at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery, Maine to be awarded by the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command. The solicitation and applicable attachments should be reviewed for requirements. No other details are provided about the required products or services, response dates, or award dates.

View the file

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Naval Facilities Engineering Command Bridge 2 Bridge Load Rating Report December 13, 2022

ES-2

westonandsampson.com rating is used for posting purposes. The following definitions for Inventory and Operating ratings, respectively, are taken from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual for Bridge Evaluation (2nd Edition).

“Load ratings based on the Inventory level allow comparisons with the capacity for new structures and, therefore, results in a live load, which can safely utilize an existing structure for an indefinite period of time.”

“Load ratings based on the Operating rating level generally describe the maximum permissible live load to which the structure may be subjected. Allowing unlimited numbers of vehicles to use the bridge at

Operating level may shorten the life of the bridge.”

The following tables summarize the rated loads and rating factors determined by the analysis:

Table 1: Scenario #1 Rating Factors – Bridge Repairs with Vehicle Rail

RATING

VEHICLE

RATING

LEVEL

VEHICLE

WEIGHT

INVENTORY RATING OPERATING RATING

CONTROLLING

MEMBER RATING

FACTOR

LOAD

RATING

(TONS)

RATING

FACTOR

LOAD

RATING

(TONS)

HL93 Design - 1.20 43.21 1.56 56.27 Interior Stringer Shear

HS20 Design 36 Tons 1.71 61.74 2.22 80.03 Interior Stringer Shear

H20 Design 20 Tons 1.74 34.82 2.25 45.14 Interior Stringer

Shear

RATING

VEHICLE

RATING

LEVEL

VEHICLE

WEIGHT

LRFR

RATING

FACTOR

LOAD

RATING

(TONS)

LRFR SAFE

POSTING LOAD

(TONS)

CONTROLLING

MEMBER

Type 3 AASHTO

Legal

25 Tons 2.57 64.45 - Main Girder

Flexure

Type 3S2 AASHTO

Legal

36 Tons 2.82 101.78 - Main Girder

Flexure

Type 3-3 AASHTO

Legal

40 Tons 3.13 125.21 - Main Girder

Flexure

SU4 SHV 27 Tons 2.30 62.12 - Main Girder

Flexure

SU5 SHV 31 Tons 2.21 68.63 - Main Girder

Flexure

SU6 SHV 35 Tons 2.21 76.94 - Main Girder

Flexure

SU7 SHV 39 Tons 2.21 85.79 - Main Girder

Flexure brian.stoddard Snapshot

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .