BRDCOM-S3267 reference-questionnaire-2025-06-01.pdf
PDF 176 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Board Room AV State and local contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- BRDCOM-S3267
- Issued by
- Washoe County, Nevada
About this file
The document is a Nevada State Purchasing Division Reference Questionnaire from the Department of Administration, located in Carson City, Nevada. This two-page form is designed for collecting client references for vendors participating in state solicitations, providing a standardized method for evaluating vendor performance across multiple dimensions. The questionnaire requires detailed feedback from previous clients, with ratings requested on 13 different evaluation items using a 1-10 scale, covering aspects such as vendor knowledge, expertise, flexibility, customer service, problem resolution, and overall satisfaction.
The reference questionnaire is confidential and designated as business information under Nevada Revised Statutes, with specific instructions for completion. Respondents are asked to rate vendor performance across categories including knowledge and expertise, flexibility with scope changes, satisfaction with delivered materials, staff interactions, schedule adherence, billing accuracy, and likelihood of future recommendation. The form allows for additional comments and emphasizes candid responses, with ratings ranging from 0 (poor performance) to 10 (exceptional performance). The document is part of the state's formal solicitation process to help evaluate potential vendors' past performance and capabilities.
View the file
Other files for this state and local contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BRDCOM-S3267 Insurance Requirements.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3267 Terms-and-conditions-for-goods.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| Standard Form Contract~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3267 Reno site-visit-registration-2025-06-01~1.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 LV site-visit-registration-2025-06-01.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 RFP 2025-07-15.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3267 Terms-and-conditions-for-services.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 LV site-visit-registration-2025-06-01~1.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 Q and A 20250814 photos small.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 Certification-regarding-lobbying.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 Cost Schedule v1.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3267 Reno site-visit-registration-2025-06-01.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3267 Q and A Answers .xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Nevada State Purchasing Division Department of Administration 515 E Musser St Ste 300 Carson City, NV 89701 purchasing.nv.gov nevadaepro.com
Revised 2024-10 Page 1 of 2
Reference questionnaire
Due Date
Solicitation number
Single point of contact name
Single point of contact email
Proposing vendor or subcontractor
Client providing the reference
Client contact name and title
Client telephone and email
Period of performance
1. CLIENT REFERENCE INSTRUCTIONS
1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposing vendor or subcontractor above. Once you have completed the reference questionnaire, please submit to the single point of contact via email, with the solicitation number in the subject line, no later than the due date above.
1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach additional pages. If attaching additional pages, please place your company/organization name on each page and reference the appropriate RFP number.
1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) and not public information pursuant to NRS 333.333. In addition to the reference questionnaire, the State may contact references for further clarification.
1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3; Average performance: 4-6; Above average performance: 7-9; Exceptional performance: 10.
2. EVALUATION ITEMS
2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) https://purchasing.nv.gov/ https://nevadaepro.com/ https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec020 https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs-333.html#NRS333Sec333
Page 2 of 2 Reference questionnaire
2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating:
2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating:
2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating:
2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating:
2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating:
2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating:
2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating:
2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating:
2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating:
2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating:
2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating:
2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating:
2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating)
2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating)
| 1. Client reference instructions |
| 1.1. As part of a formal solicitation the State of Nevada has requested vendors provide references from current and/or former clients for projects of similar size and scope. This reference questionnaire is to provide a client reference for the proposi... |
| 1.2. The State requests all questions be answered. If an answer is not known, please answer as ‘U/K’. If the question is not applicable, please answer as ‘N/A’. If additional space is needed to answer a question or provide a comment, please attach add... |
| 1.3. Do not return the completed reference questionnaire to the proposing vendor. To allow for candid responses, completed reference questionnaires are designated as confidential business information by the Administrator pursuant to NRS 333.020(5(b) a... |
| 1.1. Where a rating is requested, please provide a rating between 1-10. For all items, please provide any comments you feel would be helpful to the State in evaluation below each item. Poor or inadequate performance: 0; Below average performance: 1-3;... |
| 2. Evaluation items |
| 2.1. In what capacity have you worked with this vendor in the past? (no rating) |
| 2.2. Vendor’s knowledge and expertise, rating: |
| 2.3. Vendor’s flexibility relative to changes in scope and timelines, rating: |
| 2.4. Your satisfaction with delivered materials, rating: |
| 2.5. Dynamics and interaction between the vendor and your staff, rating: |
| 2.6. Your satisfaction with products developed by the vendor, rating: |
| 2.7. Was the schedule met and deliverables timely? Rating: |
| 2.8. Overall customer service and timeliness in response and issue resolution, rating: |
| 2.9. Accuracy and timeliness of billing, rating: |
| 2.10. Vendor’s ability to quickly and thoroughly resolve a service-related problem, rating: |
| 2.11. Vendor’s flexibility in meeting business requirements, rating: |
| 2.12. Response time and customer service of local office, if applicable, rating: |
| 2.13. Likelihood of recommending this vendor to others in the future, rating: |
| 2.14. Which aspects of this vendor’s services are you most satisfied with? (no rating) |
| 2.15. Would you recommend this vendor to your organization again? (no rating) |
| text2: |
| 1: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 211: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| 14: |
| 15: |
| rating2: |
| 2: |
| 3: |
| 4: |
| 5: |
| 6: |
| 7: |
| 8: |
| 9: |
| 10: |
| 11: |
| 12: |
| 13: |
| Solicitation-number: |
| POC-name: |
| POC-email: |
| Proposing-vendor-or-subcontractor: |
| Client-providing-the-reference: |
| Client-contact-name-and-title: |
| Client-telephone-and-email: |
| Period-of-performance: |
| Due-date: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .