BAA-AFRL-RQKS-2016-0003-Atch7.pdf

STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO)

For The

EFFECTIVE SENSOR TECHNOLOGY

EVALUATIONS AND ENABLING

METHODOLOGIES (ESTEEM)

PROGRAM

ANTI ACCESS AREA DENIAL

SYNTHETIC BATTLESPACE

PROTOTYPING METHODOLOGIES

(APM)

TASK ORDER (TO 0001)

AFRL/RYWD

8 February 2017

Attachment 7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. TECHNICAL OBJECTIVE

a. Integrated Evaluation Methodologies

b. Modeling, Simulation and Analysis (MS&A) Methodologies

c. Integrated Sensor/EW Special Projects

d. Capability Insertion Roadmaps/Plans

e. Technology/System Interoperability Assessments

2. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP)

3. BASE SUPPORT

4. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

5. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

6. FUNDING PROFILE

7. DELIVERABLES

8. CONTRACT HOLIDAYS

9. SECURITY

10. SAFETY

1. TECHNICAL OBJECTIVE

The objective of this task is to develop/evolve research methodologies for rapid assessments/evaluations (qualitative and quantitative) of advanced sensors and Electronic Warfare (EW) technologies/systems through Integrated Demonstrations and Applications Laboratory (IDAL) synthetic battlespace simulation. This effort will conduct applications assessment/demonstration research through man/hardware-in-the-loop simulation to develop/evolve advanced sensor/EW technology, concepts and systems. The APM task order will provide for collaborative research that leverages the IDAL to better enable technology maturation and transition, as well as technology capability insertion roadmaps and plans for the

IDAL.

The contractor shall provide a proposal to address the above technical objectives and the following required tasks:

a. Integrated Evaluation Methodologies

The contractor shall develop real-time simulation methodologies/technologies for rapidly evolving/evaluating advanced sensors/EW technologies/capabilities in an A2AD environment.

These methodologies shall utilize a building block approach to develop/evolve/evaluate advanced sensors/EW technologies/systems/concepts in an A2AD context, through the electronic combat test and evaluation process. The contractor shall conduct research into advanced methodologies to evaluate current, new and emerging technologies/systems in a simulated battlefield environment where the developer can mature the product before going to the final testing in the open air test range. New and emerging technologies include but are not limited to advanced emitters based on cognitive/adaptive concepts, as well as the use of cyber effects by/against EW systems.

b. Modeling, Simulation and Analysis (MS&A) Methodologies

The contractor shall research integrated system MS&A methods. The contractor shall conduct system MS&A investigations to define requirements, architectures, hardware & software designs, costs, and mission effectiveness. The contractor shall conduct MS&A experiments and demonstrations to develop, evolve, demonstrate, and evaluate EW/sensor technology, system concepts, and capabilities. MS&A methodologies will account for cognitive/adaptive technologies, as well as the cyber effects EW systems may have on the modeled and simulated threats.

c. Integrated Sensor/EW Special Projects

Special projects may be required that do not fall explicitly in a single research area. These special projects may involve multiple research areas as a result of “system of systems” concepts in an A2AD environment. They will also likely involve special security requirements which must be implemented as part of the special project research effort. Purpose developed situations could arise as the result of a technological breakthrough to support a highly classified program, or because of an actual military conflict requiring immediate research. The contractor shall have a flexible research methodology that can account for these contingencies.

d. Capability Insertion Roadmaps/Plans

The contractor shall develop/define/update capability insertion roadmaps/plans based on operational requirements, assessment and demonstration results. The contractor shall collect data for these roadmaps/plans. The contractor shall conduct performance evaluations to provide roadmap data. The contractor shall integrate capability/performance data into roadmaps/plans.

The contractor shall coordinate updates to roadmaps/plans with the appropriate government agencies.

e. Technology/System Interoperability Assessments

The contractor shall conduct technology/system interoperability assessments that include system electromagnetic interference (EMI) and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC).

2. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP)

GFP is not anticipated, but may be proposed.

3. BASE SUPPORT

Office space, laboratory environments, network access, and other accommodations in building 620, Wright-Patterson AFB will be provided. No additional base support is anticipated at this time.

4. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The contractor shall manage technical, schedule, and cost satisfaction of the program; plan, prepare, conduct, and document reviews; track CDRL satisfaction; and interface with the customer to assess performance satisfaction and re-plan the project as needed.

5. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

The technical effort shall be 36 months, with three additional months allotted for completion of the final report for a total of 39 months.

6. FUNDING PROFILE

Table 1: Funding Profile

FiscalYear FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 TOTAL

3600 funds $0. 52M $3.2M $3.175M $2.875M $9.77 M

7. DELIVERABLES

Hardware: All hardware developed or procured during concept development, assessment, and demonstration of this program.

Hardware (Residual): residual hardware developed or purchased under this program.

8. CONTRACT HOLIDAYS

The Government will not be billed for holidays, except when services are required by the Government and are actually performed on a holiday.

The following days are contract holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day.

9. SECURITY

9.1 Program Security Requirements: Individuals must be US citizens and may be required to have SCI DCID 6/4 Top Secret Eligibility based on a SSBI/SBPR to work classified efforts.

Work will be required to be conducted within an accredited Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) and/or a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). Specific security details and requirements will be outlined within future task orders. All classified efforts must be in compliance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). Other regulations/policy that may apply to this contract are JAFAN 6/0 (Revision 1); SAF/AAZ Memorandum “Air Force Special Access Programs Nomination Process (SAPNP)” (30 Sep 2013); USD(I) Memorandum, Special Access Programs Nomination Process (20 May 2013); the DoD Manual 5205.07, Volume 4 (10 Oct 2013); “Special Access Program (SAP) Security Manual”: Marking; SAF/AAZ Implementation Memorandum (7 Nov 2013); United States Air Force Security Marking Guide for SAPs (17 Jul 2011) and Revision 1 (16 Oct 2013); DoD SAPCO Memorandum, JAFAN 6/9 (23 Mar 04), Change 1 (20 Dec 05) and JAFAN 6/3 (15 Oct 2004); JAFAN 6/3 Implementation Guide, Version 1 (Sep 2006); DoD SAPCO Memorandum, Transition to the Risk Management Framework (RMF) (18 Dec 2013); Joint Special Access Program Implementation Guide (JSIG) (9 Oct 2013); DoD 8570.1-M, Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program (24 Jan 2012 – incorporating Change 3); Intelligence

Data Item

Data ACQ DOC Number

Title Frequency

A001 DI-MISC-80711A/T Scientific And Technical Reports – Final Report

One/R: Separate reports at the completion of each task order

A002 DI-FNCL-80331A/T Funds And Man-Hour Expenditure Report

Monthly

A003 DI-MGMT-81468/T Contract Funds Status Report (CFSR)

Quarterly

A004 DI-MGMT-80368A/T Status Report Monthly A005 DI-ADMN-81373/T Presentation Material As Required

Community Directives (ICD) 704 and 705; other applicable SCI regulations/policy; other applicable Security Classification Guides (SCG); and other applicable regulations/policy and subsequent revisions.

Provide the following information with proposal submission: CAGE Code, Organization Name, and Security Point of Contract (name/phone number).

9.2 The contractor shall implement the security program required to accomplish this effort. The contractor shall provide personnel with sufficient security clearance levels to be allowed access to the data necessary to execute the task order efforts. The contractor shall provide the secure facilities necessary to process the data generated under this task. The contractor shall have the ability to handle and store unclassified, proprietary, and classified information to perform this activity. The contractor shall provide the security required to perform this effort and shall implement special security requirements in accordance with classified attachments provided through government special project channels. The contractor shall ensure appropriate security protection methods are in place commensurate with the security level of the material provided to the contractor and generated by the contractor for performance of this effort. The contractor shall develop/implement an IDAL SWAT security action plan that provides measurable work tasks and schedule milestones to accomplish IDAL SWAT security objectives/requirements on a timely basis. The contractor shall provide weekly/monthly status/progress reviews against the IDAL SWAT security action plan baseline. The contractor shall coordinate security requirements/activities with the SWAT project engineer and the IDAL program manager.

9.3 General Operations Security (OPSEC) procedures, policies and awareness are required in an effort to reduce program vulnerability from successful adversary collection and exploitation of critical information. OPSEC will be applied throughout the life cycle of the contract. The Critical Information List (CIL) will be provided upon request by RYOY Information Protection Office.

While working on the government installation, OPSEC guidance will be provided by the RYOY Information Protection Office.

10. SAFETY

The contractor must comply with all Air Force, federal, state, and local safety and environmental regulations. Requires an approved Safety Plan (AFI 91-202 AFRL Sup 1) before any experiment may be conducted outside of a laboratory environment.