B08_Section_J_Attachment_9_Volume_I.pdf

PDF 957 KB Posted

Attached to
HOSP 318915 Rehabilitate Park Bathhouses
Solicitation number
140P2025R0004
Issued by

About this file

This file contains two related questionnaires for a National Park Service solicitation (140P2019XXXX): a Project Experience Questionnaire and a Past Performance Questionnaire. The Project Experience Questionnaire requires offerors to provide details about referenced projects including contractor information, pricing, performance periods, and responses to seven questions about project work performed, experience elements, price/schedule changes, problems encountered, and successful methods used.

The Past Performance Questionnaire is a source selection sensitive document to be completed partially by the offeror (sections A-B) and partially by the reference (sections C-D). It includes detailed evaluation criteria with ratings from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory across multiple performance areas including quality, schedule, cost control, management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The questionnaire must be returned to the NPS Denver Service Center Contracting Officer/Specialist. Both forms appear to be templates with placeholder text for specific project details to be filled in by respondents.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0008.pdf PDF
QA_Contractor_Answers_January_2025_0008.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0007.pdf PDF
Second_PreBid_Site_Visit_Sign_In_Sheet_0007.pdf PDF
B08_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs_0006.doc DOC document
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0006.pdf PDF
QA_Contractor_Answers_January_2025_0006.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
HOSP_CD_Final_Submittal_20231027_Reduced_Drawings_2_0004.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Prebid_Sign_in_Sheet_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
HOSP_Q_As_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_8_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_4_HOSP_CD_Part_lI_20231027_Reduced_Drawings.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_11_Construction_Contract_Administration.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_6__Div_2_thru_Div_49_REVISED_FINAL_CD_2024_10_9.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_3_Roofs_Specs_CDRev_240223.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_12__Vol_II_SubKPlan.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_1_Libbey_Specs_CDRev_240223_Reduced_File_Size.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_7__REVISED_FINAL_CD_SET_2024_10_9.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0004.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_5__Division_01_ShortForm_GeneralRequirements__REVISED_FINAL_CD_2024_10_9.pdf PDF
B08_Clauses_and_Provisions.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_10_Volume_II.pdf PDF
B08_Section_J_Attachment_2_Maurice_Specs_CDRev_240223_Reduced_File_Size.pdf PDF
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2019XXXX

Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).

Offeror Company Name

REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION

Project Title Title Project Location City, State Brief Project Description Description

Project Owner Company Name POC: First & Last Name Phone: (XXX) XXX-XXXX

CONTRACTOR LIST

List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.

Contractor Name

Role on Referenced

Project (Prime or Sub)

Trade

Price (list for each contractor’s specific work)

Performance Period

(calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work) Original Final Original Final

Sparky’s Electrical Company Prime Prime $XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XX XX

ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co Subcontractor Plumbing & Mechanical $X,XXX,XXX $X,XXX,XXX XXX XXX

Subcontractor

PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS

1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.

Response

2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.

Response

3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.

Response

5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.

Response

6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?

Response

7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.

Response

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P20XXRXXXX

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT

EXPERIENCE)

Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.

Cost Control Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating Choose an item.

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by Time / Date Name CO or CS name Title Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .