B08_Relevant_Project_Experience_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PUMPING SEPTIC TANKS & VAULT TOILETS, LEWI
- Solicitation number
- 140P8326Q0036
About this file
This is a Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire template designed to evaluate contractor qualifications for the septic tank and vault toilet pumping services contract at Lewis and Clark National Historical Park in Oregon.
The questionnaire appears to be a standard evaluation tool that requests offerors to demonstrate their relevant past performance and project experience related to septic system maintenance and vault toilet servicing. As part of a 100% small business set-aside solicitation (NAICS code 562991, with a $9.0 million size standard), this document would allow the National Park Service to assess bidders' technical capability and past performance—two of the three primary evaluation factors alongside price. Offerors selected through this solicitation would be awarded a firm-fixed-price contract for a one-year base period with up to four one-year options to provide pumping and servicing at multiple park locations. The questionnaire serves as a mechanism for responsible offeror determination under FAR subpart 9.1 and supports the government's goal of selecting the offer most advantageous to the government.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Septic_and_Vault_Toilet_Locations.jpg | JPG image | |
| Sol_140P8326Q0036.pdf | ||
| LEWI_Septic_Pumping_SOW.docx | DOCX document | |
| B08_Forms_to_Return_LEWI_Septic_Vault_Pumping.docx | DOCX document | |
| SCA_WD__2015-5577.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8326Q0036
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions in the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .