B08_Attachment_7_-_140P4226R0005_Project_Experience.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INDE-CONGRESS HALL MASONRY (CONSTR) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P4226R0005
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template for evaluating contractor experience on past projects relevant to the solicitation 140P4226R0005 for Independence-Congress Hall Masonry Construction. The template is designed to be completed by offerors responding to a total small business set-aside masonry construction contract with an estimated magnitude between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 for the National Park Service Northeast Region in Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.
The questionnaire requires offerors to submit information on referenced projects that demonstrate relevant experience, including project title, location, brief description, and owner information. Offerors must list all contractors (prime and subcontractors) involved in the referenced projects and provide specific details for each contractor's role, trade, contract price (both original and final), and performance period (both original and final calendar days). The questionnaire then directs respondents to address seven substantive questions covering the scope of work performed, alignment with evaluation criteria specified in solicitation section L, reasons for any price and schedule changes, problems encountered and resolutions implemented, successful means and methods, and any additional relevant project information. The template indicates that responses may be expanded across multiple pages as needed to adequately address each question.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .