B08_Attachment_4d_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD(1).pdf

PDF 290 KB Posted

Attached to
Replace Yampa District Multi-Operational Facility Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2025R0077
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation No. 140P2025R0080, designed to collect detailed performance evaluation information about a contractor's previous project. The questionnaire is divided into five sections: Offeror Information, Contract Information, Reference Details, Comprehensive Performance Evaluation, and Return Instructions. The evaluation section includes ratings across multiple areas such as Quality, Schedule/Time Management, Cost Control, Management, Small Business Subcontracting, and Regulatory Compliance, with rating options ranging from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. The form is intended to be completed by both the contractor and a reference, with the ultimate goal of providing source selection information for a federal procurement process, specifically for the National Park Service - Denver Service Center.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Replace Yampa District Multi-Operational Facility, newest first.
File Type Posted
B11_PreBid_DINO_310253_0003.pptx PPTX presentation
Sol_140P2025R0077_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B09_Amendment_0003_Q_A_RFP_140P2025R0077_doc_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0077_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
C12_LAYOUT_PTS_I_0002.pdf PDF
B11_PreBid_Draft_DINO_310254_0002.pdf PDF
DINO_310253-Q_A_Sheet_0002.pdf PDF
C10_GRADING_EAST_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0077_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2025R0077.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5b_SF24-23a.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_7_ContractPriceSchedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_DINO_310253_Sol_140P2025R0077_08_27_2025_Binder1.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_2_Volume_2_DINO_NPS_31025_Construction_Specifications_Final_CD_2025-05-30.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_6_Construction_Contract_Administration.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5a_Solit_VOLUME_II_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3_CD_Complete_00-Combined_signed.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_5c_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4b_Project_Experience_Questionnaire_.docx DOCX document
B08_Attachment_1_Volume_1_DINO_NPS_31025_Construction_Specifications_Final_CD_2025-05-30_(1).pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4c__Key_Personnel_Resume_Form.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_4A_Solit_VOLUME_I_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3b_WDCO20250001_07_10_2025_gov.pdf PDF
B08_Attachment_3a_WD_UT20250077_07_10_2025_gov.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P2025R0080

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT

EXPERIENCE)

Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by Submit with your proposal Name Title Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .