B08_Attachment 2 - QASP.pdf
PDF 100 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Proposal (RFP) # 959006-22-R-0004. Collaboration in NEPA Training Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95900622R0004
- Issued by
- Morris K. Udall Foundation
About this file
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan outlines the performance metrics and evaluation criteria for training services to be provided under Solicitation Number 95900622R0004, issued by the Morris K. Udall Foundation. Training courses will cover Collaboration in NEPA and provide participants with negotiation, conflict management, and environmental conflict resolution skills. Performance will be assessed across five levels based on submission of participant evaluations, average effectiveness scores for trainers, and government review. Acceptable performance thresholds vary by level from delivering evaluations and achieving average scores of 7.0 or greater for satisfactory performance, to 9.5 or higher for exceptional results.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B08 RFP 959006-22-R-0004_Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| B08 Request for Proposal (RFP) 959006-22-R-0004.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 1 - PWS_Attachment A_In-Person Agenda and Syllabus_Collaboration in NEPA_Draft_01.31.22.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 3 - CDRL_A002_Participant Training Evaluations.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 6 - RFP_Pricing Template.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| B08_Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 5 - SCA Wage Determination_2015-5474_SAM.gov.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 7 - FAR Clause 52.212-3.pdf | ||
| B08_Attachment 4 - SCA Wage Determination_2015-5473_SAM.gov.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(vApr2021)
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).
Objective Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Surveillance
Method Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional Element 1: Quality of Product or Service
Participant Training Evaluations (paper copy for in person trainings;
electronic for virtual trainings)
Do not deliver all training evaluations with the returned training materials at the end of each in-person course;
AND/OR
Receive an average score for trainer effectiveness of less than 7.0 for each training course.
Deliver all training evaluations with the returned training materials at the end of each in-person course;
AND
effectiveness of 7.0
– 7.9 for each training course.
Deliver all training evaluations with the returned training materials at the end effectiveness of 8-
8.74 for each training course.
Deliver all training evaluations with the returned training materials at the end effectiveness of 8.75
– 9.49 for each training course.
Deliver all training evaluations with the returned training materials at the end of each in-person effectiveness of 9.5 or higher for each training course.
Review and acceptance of all training evaluations.
For in-person trainings, the submission of the evaluations is inspected by the Government, in addition to calculating the average score for trainer effectiveness.
For virtual trainings, the submission of the evaluations is not applicable and the average score is calculated from the evaluations received directly by NCECR Program Manager.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .