B08_Attachment_0006_PPQ_140P5126R0008.pdf

Attachment 0006 – RFP 140P5126R0008

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation#140P5125R0014

Please complete this Questionnaire and Submit with your Quote

We are currently in the process of preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, Contracting Operations (ConOps) East, Solicitation Number: 140P5126R0008 that will provide Maintenance Repairs of Unpaved Roads - Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area (BISO) Onieda, Tennessee.

Provide Maintenance Repairs of Unpaved Roads by delivering a minimum of 16,100 tons of TDOT 903-specification crusher run limestone aggregate (¾-inch down to fines) or an NPS-approved equivalent.

Tailgate-spread aggregate in a uniform and continuous manner across the full width of travel along each designated road segment unless otherwise directed by the COR. Spot dumping, segregation, or uneven distribution is not permitted. Aggregate shall be tailgate-spread to achieve a uniform average lift of three

(3) inches, with an allowable tolerance of plus or minus one-half (0.5) inch. The contractor shall use hauling equipment capable of safely accessing all roadways. Most roads maintain approximate clearances of ten (10) feet width and twelve (12) feet height; however, Duncan Hollow Road, Alfred Smith Road, Jack Ridge Road, and Big Island Road contain tighter segments with minimum clearances of nine (9) feet width and eleven (11) feet height. The contractor is solely responsible for selecting appropriate equipment and ensuring safe passage without resource damage. The contractor must provide all traffic control necessary to safely deliver materials, including managing encounters with public vehicles on narrow roads. The National Park Service will not supply flaggers or escorts for Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area (BISO) Onieda, Tennessee.

As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the previous/current contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

Please complete this Questionnaire and submit with your quote

Questionnaire is due to prior to the closing of RFP #140P5126R0008.

POC name:

POC phone number:

POC e-mail address:

Thank you.

NAME OF OFFEROR:

Phone: Fax:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information

CONTRACT REFERENCED:

1. Contract or Identifying Number:

2. Contract Value:

3. Period of Performance:

4. Brief description of items provided:

5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency/Company:

Title: Phone:

E-mail:

II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions –

The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

NOT APPLICABLE (N/A)

Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.

Past Performance Evaluation

Question 1. Performance

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A

Performance

Comments, if any.

Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Question 4. Quality of Work

What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet requirements of tasks and the overall quality of the work?

Quality of Shipments

Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance

What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

General Comments: