B08_Attach_7_Project_Experience.docx
DOCX document 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- YELL 338223 - Bridge Preservation
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0073
- Issued by
- Not on record
About this file
This is a project experience attachment document that establishes qualification requirements for bidders responding to the Bridge Preservation solicitation (YELL 338223) issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service. The document specifies that contractors must demonstrate relevant experience through detailed project histories showing prior work on similar bridge preservation, restoration, or rehabilitation efforts. Bidders are required to provide documented evidence of completed projects including project names, locations, dates of completion, project scopes, contract values, and client references to substantiate their technical capability and past performance in executing bridge preservation work. The attachment serves as an evaluation criterion to ensure that selected contractors possess the necessary expertise, experience, and track record to successfully complete the National Park Service bridge preservation project.
The project experience documentation allows the government to assess contractor qualifications based on demonstrated competency in bridge-related construction or preservation activities. Contractors must provide sufficient detail regarding project scope, complexity, budget, and timeline to allow meaningful comparison of capabilities. This qualification requirement ensures that only bidders with proven experience in bridge infrastructure work will be selected, reducing project risk and ensuring quality execution of the preservation work for the National Park Service.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Solicitation: 140P2026R0073
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
B08 Solit Vol I Experience 1v Sept2025
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .