B08_Attach_5_Project_Experience_Vol_I.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GOGA 319407 - Bridge Preservation
- Solicitation number
- 140P2026R0053
About this file
This is a Project Experience Questionnaire template designed for the solicitation 140P2026R0053 (GOGA 319407 - Bridge Preservation) issued by the Department of the Interior National Park Service. The document is an appendix that does not specify required products or services; rather, it serves as an evaluation tool for assessing contractor qualifications based on relevant past project experience.
The questionnaire requires offerors to submit information on referenced projects that demonstrate experience relevant to the Project Experience evaluation subfactor outlined in solicitation section L. Respondents must provide details for each project including title, location, brief description, and project owner contact information. For each contractor involved (prime or subcontractors), offerors must document their role, trade/work scope, contract price (both original and final), and performance period (original and final calendar days). The questionnaire then poses seven substantive questions asking contractors to describe their work performed, identify which Project Experience elements were addressed, explain price and schedule variances with supporting rationale, detail problems encountered and their resolutions, discuss successful means and methods and their applicability to the proposed project, and provide any additional relevant project information. The template allows for expansion across multiple pages as needed to adequately address all questions.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2026R0053
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .