Attachment5-EvaluationCriteria.pdf
PDF 567 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1240BH26Q0011
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document for a commercial items solicitation (1240BH26Q0011) issued by the USDA. The Government will evaluate quotations using a lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) approach, awarding to the offeror representing the best value. Price quotations will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness in accordance with FAR 12.204.
Technical Acceptability will receive an overall rating of either "acceptable" or "unacceptable" based on the quoter's ability to provide a sound and compliant approach that meets all requirements and demonstrates thorough understanding. All quoters must submit: (1) a narrative detailing previous experience performing similar work, including years of experience, personnel skills and licensing, and subcontractor information if applicable; and (2) a list of relevant prior work performed within the past six years with project owner contact information, project name, location, work description, and dollar value. Past Performance will be rated as Acceptable (contractor demonstrates ability to meet contract requirements including quality of work, timeliness, cost control, business relations, and adherence to contract terms), Neutral (offeror lacks a past performance record), or Unacceptable (contractor has documented history of failing to meet contract requirements including poor quality, missed deadlines, cost overruns, lack of responsiveness, or unethical behavior). The Government may reference provided contractor references, past USDA contracts, and CPARS to evaluate past performance. Under the LPTA evaluation method, only the lowest priced offer will be initially evaluated for Technical Acceptability. If the lowest priced offer does not receive acceptable technical or past performance ratings, evaluation continues down the price list until the lowest price, technically acceptable offer with acceptable or neutral past performance is identified.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation-Commercial Items
The provision at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-2 Evaluation of Commercial Items is not applicable to this solicitation. In lieu of this provision, quotes will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 12.203 based on the criteria listed below. Award will be made to the offeror representing the best value to the Government.
Price:
The offeror’s quotation will be evaluated in accordance with FAR 12.204, to determine if it is fair and reasonable.
Technical Acceptability:
Technical Acceptability will be evaluated to receive an overall rating of "acceptable" or "unacceptable." This will be based on the quoter's ability to provide a sound and compliant approach that meets all requirements and shows a thorough understanding of them. It is the contractor's responsibility to ensure their quotation clearly demonstrates their capability to meet these requirements. All quoters must provide the following minimum information and documentation with their quotations to be have their quotes evaluated:
Previous experience: Submit a short narrative providing details of the experience the firm has (either as a prime or sub-contractor) performing similar work. List years of experience, skills and licensing of personnel to be used on the project. If you will be utilizing subcontractor(s), provide the same information for them.
Past Performance:
Submit a list of relevant prior work the contractor has performed within the past six (6) years along with contact information so the government may contact prior customers to evaluate past performance. If you will be utilizing subcontractor(s), provide the same information for them.
Information should include the project name, location, description of the work, dollar value and name/phone/email of project owner representative. Attachment 7 to this solicitation is a Past Performance Form that is optional for use.
The Government may utilize any references provided by the Contractor, along with information available from past contracts/orders with the USDA and any information found using sources such as Federal Government sources or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to determine if the Contractor has acceptable or neutral Past Performance. Past Performance will be evaluated using the following rating system:
• Acceptable: The contractor shows a demonstrated ability to meet contract requirements in prior or current contracts, including quality of work, timeliness, cost control, business relations, and adherence to contract terms.
• Neutral: Offeror does not have a past performance record.
Attachment 5
1240BH26Q0011
• Unacceptable: The contractor has a documented history of failing to meet contract requirements, including poor quality, missed deadlines, cost overruns, lack of responsiveness, or unethical behavior.
Evaluation Method The Government will evaluate quotations based on the lowest price technically acceptable criteria. Only the lowest priced offer will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability. Should the lowest priced offer not receive an acceptable technical or past performance rating, the process will continue in order of lowest priced offer until the lowest price, technically acceptable offer with acceptable or neutral past performance is identified.
Attachment 5
1240BH26Q0011
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .