Attachment V - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ 1305M221QNMAN0082 for the FY21 Drydock Repairs to the NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson
Solicitation number
1305M221QNMAN0082
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a related solicitation opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor and addresses quality, schedule, and management performance ratings on a recent contract. It requires ratings in these categories and commentary to be submitted to NOAA by June 23, 2021.

The related solicitation is RFQ 1305M221QNMAN0082 issued by NOAA for drydock repairs to the NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson. Interested parties must request reference documents and drawings from the specified NOAA contracting staff due to file size limitations. No other details on required repairs, response date, or award timing are provided in this information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0007.pdf PDF
Attachment I - NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson Intermediate Drydock Detail Specification_REV.3.pdf PDF
REV. 2 Attachment VI - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
REV. 1 Attachment VI - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Attachment I - NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson Intermediate Drydock Detail Specification_REV.2.pdf PDF
DY-671-002 Dive Locker arrangement.pdf PDF
DY-529-001 SHT 004 for Mod.pdf PDF
DY-163-FP19 Seachest Diagram Rev 3.pdf PDF
DY-256-FP08 Revision 05 sea water cooling.pdf PDF
DY-524-FP23 Aux Seawater Cooling System Diagram Rev 04.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
DY Davit hydraulic hose certificate.pdf PDF
DY-521-FP20 Rev 3 Firemain System.pdf PDF
Attachment I - NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson Intermediate Drydock Detail Specification_REV.1.pdf PDF
DY-085-FA01 Outboard Profile Rev 3.pdf PDF
OD-602-FH60-001 Hull Designated Markings Rev 02 Final.pdf PDF
DY-591-01 Trawling Winch Engineering (047).pdf PDF
DY_528_DY-528-003_RevA_Sht1 THRU 3_N_MODIFICATIONS TO GRAY AND BLACK W.pdf PDF
DY-528-002_RevA MODIFICATIONS TO GRAY AND BLACK WATER SYSTEMS.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
DY-085-FZ30 Booklet of General Drawings Rev 0.pdf PDF
DY anchor motor name plate.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
1305M221QNMAN0082_REV 1.docx DOCX document
Attachment II - Deliverables List.docx DOCX document
1305M221QNMAN0082.pdf PDF
Attachment IV - Past Performance Information Form.pdf PDF
Attachment VI - Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment I - NOAA Ship Oscar Dyson Intermediate Drydock Detail Specification.pdf PDF
Attachment VII - Subcontracting Plan Outline.doc DOC document
Attachment III - AIRs Process Document.docx DOCX document
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #:_______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)

Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________

Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________

Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to frank.burton@noaa.gov no later than June 23, 12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time (EST).

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Source Selection Information

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to frank.burton@noaa.gov no later than June 23, 2021 12:00 PM EST.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .