Attachment_L5_Present_Past_Performance_Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

FA8903-27-R-0014 21 Oct 2026 Attachment L-5 For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Section L: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire The Air Force Civil Engineering Center Installations Directorate (AFCEC/CI) of the Air Force Material Command (AFMC) is in the process of competitively selecting a source(s) for Air Force (AF) Privatization Management Programs (PMP) and Housing, Enhanced Use Lease, Lodging and Utility (HELU) Privatization Management for long-term cradle to grave management of Advisory & Assistance Services (A&AS) in support of the AF privatized programs. This includes Asset, Acquisition and Portfolio Management services in support of HEU throughout the United States.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors' past performance for Housing and Utility Privatization contracts or other work efforts which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, submit the questionnaire electronically and e-mail to Mark Ingle, email: mark.ingle.2@us.af.mil and Michael I Grasso, email: michael.grasso.2@us.af.mil. Please call or email Michael I. Grasso, email: michael.grasso.2@us.af.mil, Contracting Officer at M: 210-395-8730/C; 210-347-9488, if you have any questions. Title of email: RFP FA8903-27-R-0014, Present/Past Performance Questionnaire. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

MICHAEL I GRASSO

Contracting Officer Date : 21 Oct 2026

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. For projects that are actively being performed, provide the percent complete as of the date of solicitation for this contract:

L. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

M. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

V VERY GOOD – During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

S SATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

M MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the PWS for:

-Housing -EUL -UP

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T3. How accurate, complete and on time were the contractors submitted data/reports?

T4. How well did the contractor provide innovative solutions to the identified issues from the data/reports?

T5. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program interested parties, (i.e. Government, public sector) including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

P5. How effective was the contractor’s proposed alternative method/processes that provided cost savings, enhanced efficiency or quality?

P6. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

P7. How effective was the contractor in developing/implementing strategies to coordinate, gather and analyze data from multiple stakeholders and report to each management level?

P8. How effective was the contractor in providing real time access and dissemination of program/project data and documents?

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

C1. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C2. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

Is there any additional information (positive or negative) regarding this contractor that the Government should be aware of?

Is there anyone else we should contact regarding this contract?

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: Linda L. Cavazos; linda.cavazos@us.af.mil Michael Grasso; michael.grasso.3@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 8