Attachment J-10 IT Access Control Standard_Redacted.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Title IV Financial Aid Origination and Disbursement (TIVOD) System & Customer Services Transition Services
- Solicitation number
- 91003124R0005
About this file
This document is an IT Access Control (AC) Standard for the U.S. Department of Education (ED). It establishes department-level IT system access control standards to comply with federal laws, regulations, and directives. The standard covers policies and procedures, account management, access enforcement, information flow enforcement, separation of duties, least privilege, unsuccessful login attempts, system use notification, remote access, wireless access, and other access control requirements. The standard designates responsibilities and review processes for ED offices, including the Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Information Officer, and Information System Security Officers. It also outlines requirements for downgrading security controls, handling risk exceptions, and automated system management. This standard applies to all ED information systems, including those provided by external sources.
The related federal contract opportunity is a two-phase solicitation for the Title IV Financial Aid Origination and Disbursement (TIVOD) System & Customer Services Transition Services. Phase I involves submitting offers based on Go/No-Go criteria and Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM). Only offerors selected for Phase II will receive the full solicitation. The solicitation is being conducted by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Student Aid.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Information Technology (IT) Access Control (AC) Standard
February 9, 2024
U.S. Department of Education (ED)
Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO)
Information Assurance Services (IAS)
Questions about the policies outlined in this document should be directed to Information Assurance Services (IAS) at OCIO_IAS@ed.gov
Information Technology (IT) Access Control (AC) Standard
Version 5.5 iii
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Scope
2 STANDARDS
2.1 AC-01 Policy and Procedures (P, L, M, H)
2.2 AC-02 Account Management (L, M, H and Control Overlay)
2.3 AC-03 Access Enforcement (L, M, H)
2.4 AC-04 Information Flow Enforcement (M, H)
2.5 AC-05 Separation of Duties (M, H and Control Overlay)
2.6 AC-06 Least Privilege (M, H and Control Overlay)
2.7 AC-07 Unsuccessful Logon Attempts (L, M, H)
2.8 AC-08 System Use Notification (L, M, H and Control Overlay)
2.9 AC-10 Concurrent Session Control (H)
2.10 AC-11 Device Lock (M, H)
2.11 AC-12 Session Termination (M, H)
2.12 AC-14 Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication (L, M, H)
2.13 AC-17 Remote Access (L, M, H)
2.14 AC-18 Wireless Access (L, M, H)
2.15 AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices (L, M, H)
2.16 AC-20 Use of External Systems (L, M, H)
2.17 AC-21 Information Sharing (M, H)
2.18 AC-22 Publicly Accessible Content (L, M, H)
2.19 AC-23 Data Mining Protection
3 RISK ACCEPTANCE/POLICY EXCEPTIONS
4 ACRONYMS
APPENDIX A - BASELINE CONTROL PARAMETER SUMMARY
APPENDIX B - USER NOTIFICATION WARNING BANNER
Version 5.5 1
1 INTRODUCTION
This governance document establishes U.S. Department of Education (ED or Department) information technology (IT) system access control standards necessary to improve the efficiency of operation or security of Department information systems and comply with Federal laws, regulations, Executive Orders (EO), Emergency Directives, Binding Operational Directives (BOD), and Department Administrative Communications System Directives (ACSD) and Handbooks. In doing so, these standards supersede any prior governance documentation establishing such standards.
1.1 Purpose
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA)1 and implementing governance Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, Managing Information as a Strategic Resource2, requires each federal agency to develop, document, and implement an agency-wide program to provide information security for the information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the agency, including those provided or managed by another agency, contractor, or other source, and services that are either fully or partially provided, including agency-hosted, outsourced, and cloud-based solutions. Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication (PUB) 200, Minimum Security Requirements for Federal Information and Information Systems3, mandates the use of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-53, Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations4, as amended, as baseline information system controls.
1.2 Scope
These standards apply to all information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the Department, including those provided or managed by another agency, contractor, or other source, as well as services that are either fully or partially provided, including Department-hosted, outsourced, and cloud-based solutions. Principal Offices, employees, contractors, external service providers and system users are required to comply with these access control standards.
1 Public Law 113-283-Dec. 18, 2014, https://www.congress.gov/113/plaws/publ283/PLAW-113publ283.pdf 2 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/circulars/A130/a130revised.pdf 3 FIPS PUB 200, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/fips/nist.fips.200.pdf 4 NIST SP 800-53, Rev. 5, https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-53/rev-5/final
Version 5.5 2
2 STANDARDS
The Department standards for IT system access controls are organized to follow the order in which controls are presented in the current version of NIST SP 800-53. To define a control baseline for Department information systems, a FIPS PUB 199 categorization level (e.g., Low [L], Moderate [M] and High [H]) is assigned to each requirement. This designator indicates a requirement applies to information systems categorized at that FIPS PUB 199 impact-level. Designators are also used to indicate when NIST SP 800-53 Privacy (P) baseline controls are required. To manage risk to
Department requires implementation of control(s) that are not required by the FIPS PUB 199 impact-level or privacy baseline.
In addition to the controls required by this standard, high value assets (HVAs) must implement and comply with the current version of the HVA Control Overlay5 issued and maintained by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). Systems that process federal tax information (FTI) must implement and comply with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Publication 10756, Tax Information Security Guidelines for Federal, State and Local Agencies: Safeguards for Protecting Federal Tax Returns and Return Information. Systems that are Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) authorized must implement and comply with the FedRAMP identified baselines7.
Throughout the standard, there are controls captured that have not been scoped to any specific security or privacy baseline. This is intentional as all controls for identified external overlays and baselines (e.g., FedRAMP, IRS, HVA), that may apply to systems within the Department, have been incorporated into the standard. This ensures the organization defined parameters (ODPs) for controls within the Department have been clearly defined in a consistent manner.
Based upon an assessment of risk and determination that the level of protection for the security-relevant information within a system is not adversely impacted, media protection controls identified in the current version of NIST SP 800-53B that support only the confidentiality security objective may be downgraded to the corresponding media protection control in a lower baseline (or modified or eliminated if not defined in a lower baseline).
security Framework (CSF) and NIST Privacy Framework (PF) by using business drivers to guide cybersecurity activities and considering cybersecurity ris management processes. Refer to APPENDIX A - BASELINE CONTROL PARAMETER SUMMARY for a summary of controls by baseline and corresponding NIST CSF and NIST PF categories and subcategories.
5 HVA Control Overlay https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/high-value-asset-control-overlay 6 IRS Publication 1075 https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1075.pdf 7 FedRAMP baselines https://www.fedramp.gov/baselines/
Version 5.5 3
2.1 AC-01 Policy and Procedures (P, L, M, H)
Develop, document, and disseminate to all ED employees, contractors, and users authorized to access to ED information systems, or systems/services operated or maintained on behalf of ED, or ED information as defined in ACSD-OCIO-0048, Cybersecurity Policy, a department-level access control policy (e.g., this document) that:
(a) addresses purpose, scope, roles, responsibilities, management commitment, coordination among organizational entities, and compliance; and
(b) is consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.
(c) authorizes the Department Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and Department Chief Information Officer (CIO) to issue subordinate standards, procedures, and memos, with the same authority and enforcement as ACSD-OCIO-004, Cybersecurity Policy.
The Department CISO in conjunction with the Senior Agency Official for Privacy (SAOP) are designated to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the Department-level IT system access control policy.
Review and update the policy annually (i.e., each fiscal year) and following the identification of evolving threats, issuance of new or significantly changed existing Federal laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, and ED policies, identification of emerging technology and information technology service delivery models and determination that adjustments are deemed necessary to improve its effectiveness based upon feedback from Principal Office personnel.
The Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO), Information Assurance Services (IAS) manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the Department-level IT system access control standard operating procedures in support of this policy standard. IAS Branch Chiefs shall review these access control procedures annually (i.e., each fiscal year) and following the identification of evolving threats, issuance of new or significantly changed existing Federal laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, and ED policies, identification of emerging technology and information technology service delivery models and determination that adjustments are deemed necessary to improve its effectiveness based upon feedback from Principal Office personnel.
Principal Office Information System Owners (ISO) and Information System Security Officers (ISSOs) are required to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of system specific IT system access control policy, and the associated access controls. The ISO and ISSO review access control procedures annually (i.e., each fiscal year) and following the identification of evolving threats, issuance of new or significantly changed existing Federal laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, and
8 Also known as OCIO: 3-112
Version 5.5 4
ED policies, identification of emerging technology and information technology service delivery models and determination that adjustments are deemed necessary to improve its effectiveness based upon feedback from Principal Office personnel.
2.2 AC-02 Account Management (L, M, H and Control Overlay)
a. Define and document the types of accounts allowed and specifically prohibited for use within the system.
b. Assign account managers.
c. Require ISO and ISSO to document recommended prerequisites and criteria (based on defined user role(s) matrix in the System Security Plan (SSP) System Description Narrative: Types of Users) and require implementation of these prerequisites and criteria for group and role membership.
d. Specify:
1. Authorized users of the system.
2. Group and role membership.
3. Access authorizations (i.e., privileges) and the following attributes as defined in the user role(s) matrix in SSP System Description Narrative: User Types: Internal or External;
Privileged (P), Non-Privileged (NP), or No Logical Access (NLA); Sensitivity Level9 in accordance with control PS-2; Authorized Privileges; and Functions Performed for each account.
e. Require approvals by ISO, ISSO, or assigned delegate for requests to create accounts.
f. Create, enable, modify, disable, and remove accounts in accordance with least privilege and separation of duties, and Department policies and supporting standards, including the standards within this document.
g. Monitor the use of accounts.
h. Notify account managers and assigned help desks, support services teams, ISO, ISSO, or assigned delegate(s), when applicable, within:
1. As soon as possible but no later than one business day after notification received with actions for privileged users prioritized, when accounts are no longer required;
2. As soon as possible but no later than one business day after notification received with actions for privileged users prioritized, when users are terminated or transferred; and
9 Position Sensitivity And Risk (opm.gov)
Version 5.5 5
3. As soon as possible but no later than one business day after notification received with actions for privileged users prioritized, when system usage or need-to-know changes for an individual.
i. Authorize access to the system based on:
1. A valid access authorization;
2. Intended system usage; and
3. Requested roles/privileges.
j. Review accounts for compliance with account management requirements monthly for HVAs and High impact systems and quarterly for Moderate and Low impact systems. Based upon the review, modify, or remove accounts, as necessary, to correctly reflect organizational mission and business need. Not applicable to cloud service providers or Shared Services.
k. Establish and implement a process for changing shared or group account authenticators (if deployed) when individuals are removed from the group.
l. Align account management processes with personnel termination and transfer process.
Control Overlay AC-02 ED-01 (L, M, H): Uniquely identify and authenticate each service attempting to access EO-critical software or EO-critical software platforms.
Control Overlay AC-02 ED-02 (L, M, H): Follow privileged access management principles for network-based administration of EO-critical software and EO-critical software platforms by requiring unique identification of each administrator.
2.2.1 AC-02(01) Account Management | Automated System Account Management (M, H)
Support the management of system accounts using internal system functions, ED Identity, Credential, and Access Management (ICAM), single sign on, or recommended automated mechanisms approved by the ED Authorizing Official (AO) and with email, telephonic, and text messaging notifications sent to system personnel, including the ISO and ISSO, when functionality is available.
2.2.2 AC-02(02) Account Management | Automated Temporary and Emergency Account Management (M, H and Control Overlay)
Automatically disable temporary and emergency accounts after identification that the temporary/emergency access is no longer required, not to exceed one business day.
Control Overlay AC-02(02) ED-01 (L, M, H): Document, approve and govern emergency/break glass accounts required to support administration of Department mission critical infrastructure.
Version 5.5 6
2.2.3 AC-02(03) Account Management | Disable Accounts (M, H and Control Overlay)
Disable accounts within as soon as possible but no later than one business day when the accounts:
a. Have expired;
b. Are no longer associated with a user or individual;
c. Are in violation of organizational policy; or
d. Have been inactive for ninety (90) days for Moderate systems and 30 days for High systems and HVAs. If no automated capability is available, manual methods must be implemented and documented in the SSP. ISSOs are responsible for ensuring inactive accounts are disabled if the system cannot do so automatically.
Control Overlay AC-02(03) ED-01 (L): Disable accounts within as soon as possible but no later than one business day when the accounts:
a. Have expired;
b. Are no longer associated with a user or individual;
c. Are in violation of organizational policy; or
d. Have been inactive for ninety (90) days for Low systems. If no automated capability is available, manual methods must be implemented and documented in the SSP. ISSOs are responsible for ensuring inactive accounts are disabled if the system cannot do so automatically.
2.2.4 AC-02(04) Account Management | Automated Audit Actions (M, H)
Automatically audit account creation, modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions.
2.2.5 AC-02(05) Account Management | Inactivity Logout (M, H)
Require that users log out when they expect to be inactive for more than 12 hours.
2.2.6 AC-02(07) Account Management | Privileged User Accounts
a. Establish and administer privileged user accounts in accordance with a role-based access scheme, and only one local account to be used as the account of last resort in the event the authentication service is unavailable;
b. Monitor privileged role or attribute assignments;
c. Monitor changes to roles or attributes; and
d. Revoke access when privileged role or attribute assignments are no longer appropriate.
Version 5.5 7
2.2.7 AC-02(09) Account Management | Restrictions on Use of Shared and Group Accounts
Only permit the use of shared and group accounts that meet a defined need with business justification explaining why such accounts are necessary and the conditions for establishing shared and group accounts.
2.2.8 AC-02(11) Account Management | Usage Conditions (H)
Enforce ISSO recommended circumstances and/or usage conditions which determine when system accounts can be used such as restricting usage to certain days of the week, time of day, or specific durations of time approved by the ISO for privileged user, temporary and emergency accounts.
2.2.9 AC-02(12) Account Management | Account Monitoring for Atypical Usage (H)
a. Monitor system accounts for atypical times of day and originating internet protocol (IP) address for a known privileged account user that are inconsistent with normal usage patterns;
and
b. Report atypical usage of system accounts to the ED Security Operations Center (EDSOC) and
ISSO.
2.2.10 AC-02(13) Account Management | Disable Accounts for High-Risk Individuals (M, H)
Disable accounts of individuals within twenty-four (24) hours of discovery of a security incident reported to or under investigation by the EDSOC. Accounts can be directed to be disabled by the CIO/CISO/ED Information System Security Manager (ISSM)/ISSO/ISO/ Representative (COR)/EDSOC in reference to a security incident. If automated disabling capability is unavailable, manual methods must be implemented and documented in the SSP.
ISSOs are responsible for ensuring inactive accounts are disabled.
2.3 AC-03 Access Enforcement (L, M, H)
Enforce approved authorizations for logical access to information and system resources in accordance with applicable access control policies.
2.3.1 AC-03(09) Access Enforcement | Controlled Release
Release information outside of the system only if:
a. The receiving system or system component provides a level of protection commensurate with the confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact levels of the information being shared; and
b. A documented manual process or automated tools are used to validate the appropriateness of the information designated for release.
Version 5.5 8
2.3.2 AC-03(11) Access Enforcement | Restrict Access to Specific Information Types
Restrict access to data repositories containing cryptographic keys, authentication information, and sensitive information requiring extra protection (e.g., personally identifiable information, federal tax information).
2.3.3 AC-03(14) Access Enforcement | Individual Access (P)
Provide a self-service mechanism (e.g., application interface) and/or the Department's Privacy Act Request Form to enable individuals to have access to the following elements of their personally identifiable information those elements identified in privacy disclosures with the SAOP and Office of the General Counsel (OGC) consulted to determine appropriate mechanisms and access rights or limitations.
2.4 AC-04 Information Flow Enforcement (M, H)
Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of information within the system and between connected systems based on the approved enterprise zero trust architecture (ZTA) services (e.g., Web Service Security [WS Security], WS-Security Policy, WS Trust, WS Policy Framework, Security Assertion Markup Language [SAML], Extensible Access Control Markup Language [XACML]).
2.4.1 AC-04(04) Information Flow Enforcement | Flow Control of Encrypted Information (H)
Prevent encrypted information from bypassing authorized information flow control mechanisms available for use by decrypting the information; blocking the flow of the encrypted information;
or terminating communications sessions attempting to pass encrypted information.
2.4.2 AC-04(21) Information Flow Enforcement | Physical or Logical Separation of Information Flows
Separate information flows logically or physically using defined mechanisms and/or techniques to accomplish business or mission required separations by types of information.
2.5 AC-05 Separation of Duties (M, H and Control Overlay)
a. Identify and document within the system description narrative, all system user roles, privileges, and duties assigned to each role, the specific duties and privileges that each role cannot perform, and rationale for why they are incompatible; and
b. Define system access authorizations to support separation of duties.
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-01 (M, H): Separate duties so that critical IT functions are segregated to prevent any one person from having the authority or ability to harm or circumvent normal checks and balances of a development or an operational system or the services it provides, whether by accident, omission, or intentional act.
Version 5.5 9
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-02 (M, H): Consider and document user roles, privileges, and duties that are potential for fraudulent activity during assignment and review of system access privileges.
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-03 (M, H): Determine assignment of roles by ISOs and designees to ensure:
a. At least two people are involved within each process or sub-process
b. Two people are involved in certain controls, where necessary (i.e., at times a single control may be split into activities that are assigned to different individuals)
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-04 (M, H): Ensure system development roles for financial systems categorized as HVAs are distinctly segregated from production environments. Per ACSD-OFO- 00310, Financial Management, a financial system is an information system comprised of one or more applications that are used for any of the following:
a. Collecting, processing, maintaining, transmitting, and reporting data about financial events;
b. Supporting financial planning or budgeting activities;
c. Accumulating and reporting cost information; or
d. Supporting the preparation of financial statements.
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-05 (M, H): Ensure the following incompatible responsibilities are separated for financial systems:
a. Initiation of a transaction vs. approval of the same transaction
b. Updating of vendor/employee records vs. approval of financial transactions related to that vendor/employee
c. Processing of transactions vs. authorization of access to systems/applications.
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-06 (M, H): Establish mitigating controls in instances in which it is impractical to have meaningful separation of duties due to limited staff and ensure these controls are rigorously documented and followed. In such cases, direct managerial involvement provides a strong deterrent to potential conflicting activities/interests. Examples of such involvement include:
a. Rotation of duties among personnel
b. Increased hands-on supervision
c. Enforced vacations
d. Having a manager perform one aspect of the transaction (e.g., approving invoices)
10 Also known as OFO: 1-103
Version 5.5 10
e. Active review by management of financial data and reports (e.g., reconciliations, voucher status report, appropriation status reports)
f. A detailed management review of activities involving finances, inventory, and other assets must be required as a compensating control activity.
g. Increased frequency of audit log review, especially for those logs generated from privileged user activities.
h. Increase monitoring through behavioral and pattern detection to identify atypical behavior.
Control Overlay AC-05 ED-07 (L):
a. Identify and document within the system description narrative, all system user roles, privileges, and duties assigned to each role, the specific duties and privileges that each role cannot perform, and rationale for why they are incompatible; and
b. Define system access authorizations to support separation of duties.
2.6 AC-06 Least Privilege (M, H and Control Overlay)
Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (or processes acting on behalf of users) that are necessary to accomplish assigned organizational and system specific tasks.
Control Overlay AC-06 ED-01 (L, M, H): Use fine-grained access control for data and resources used by EO-critical software and EO-critical software platforms to enforce the principle of least privilege to the extent possible.
Control Overlay AC-06 ED-02 (L): Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses for users (or processes acting on behalf of users) that are necessary to accomplish assigned organizational tasks.
2.6.1 AC-06(01) Least Privilege | Authorize Access to Security Functions (M, H)
Authorize access for security administrators, system administrators, system security officers, system programmers, and other privileged users to:
a. Security functions (deployed in hardware, software, and firmware) including, at a minimum:
1. Establishing system accounts, configuring access authorizations (i.e., permissions, privileges);
2. Setting/modifying audit logs and auditing behavior.
3. Setting/modifying boundary protection system rules;
4. Configuring/modifying access authorizations (i.e., permissions, privileges);
5. Setting/modifying authentication parameters; and
Version 5.5 11
6. Setting/modifying system configurations and parameters; and
b. Filtering rules for routers or firewalls, configuration parameters for security services, cryptographic key management information, and access control lists.
2.6.2 AC-06(02) Least Privilege | Non-privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions (M, H)
Require that users of system accounts (or roles) with access to security relevant information or security functions (examples of security functions include but are not limited to: establishing system accounts, configuring access authorizations (i.e., permissions, privileges), setting events to be audited, and setting intrusion detection parameters, system programming, system and security administration, other privileged functions) use non-privileged accounts or roles, when accessing non-security functions.
2.6.3 AC-06(03) Least Privilege | Network Access to Privileged Commands (H)
Authorize network access to all privileged commands (i.e., any command requiring privileges above a standard user) only for compelling operational needs as approved by the ISO, ISSO, and or the AO, based upon an assessment of risk and document the rationale for such access in the security plan for the system.
2.6.4 AC-06(05) Least Privilege | Privileged Accounts (M, H)
Restrict privileged accounts on the system to individuals, services and systems/machines approved by the ISO, ISSO, and/or the AO based upon an assessment of risk.
2.6.5 AC-06(06) Least Privilege | Privileged Access by Non-Organizational Users
Prohibit privileged access to the system by non-organizational users.
2.6.6 AC-06(07) Least Privilege | Review of User Privileges (M, H and Control Overlay)
a. Review monthly for HVAs and High impact systems; quarterly for Moderate impact systems the privileges assigned to all privileged roles and users to validate the need for such privileges;
and
b. Reassign or remove privileges, if necessary, to correctly reflect organizational mission and business needs.
Control Overlay AC-06(07) ED-01 (L): Review Quarterly for Low impact systems the privileges assigned to all privileged roles and users to validate the need for such privileges. Based upon the review, reassign or remove privileges, if necessary, to correctly reflect organizational mission and business need.
2.6.7 AC-06(08) Least Privilege | Privilege Levels for Code Execution
Prevent the following software from executing at higher privilege levels than users executing the software: any software except software explicitly documented, approved, and registered on the technology standards and products guide (TSPG).
Version 5.5 12
2.6.8 AC-06(09) Least Privilege | Log Use of Privileged Functions (M, H)
Log the execution of privileged functions.
2.6.9 AC-06(10) Least Privilege | Prohibit Non-Privileged Users from Executing Privileged Functions (M, H)
Prevent non-privileged users from executing privileged functions.
2.7 AC-07 Unsuccessful Logon Attempts (L, M, H)
a. Enforce a limit of three (3) consecutive invalid logon attempts by a user during a thirty (30) minute period with system accounts locked immediately upon any unsuccessful attempt to login; and
b. Automatically lock the account or node for thirty (30) minutes unless the user contacts the Help Desk to manually unlock the account during the thirty (30) minute period. For system accounts and systems unable to set the thirty (30) minute lockout duration, accounts must remain locked until being reset by an administrator. After three (3) consecutive account lock-outs due to unsuccessful login attempts, the account must be disabled until an administrator can re-enable it.
2.7.1 AC-07(02) Unsuccessful Logon Attempts | Purge or Wipe Mobile Device
Purge or wipe information from mobile devices based on approved purging or wiping requirements and techniques after ten (10) consecutive, unsuccessful device logon attempts.
2.8 AC-08 System Use Notification (L, M, H and Control Overlay)
Except for Institute of Education Sciences (IES) websites that adhere to the Education Science Reform Act11, all Principal Office systems must:
a. Display system use notification message or banner (see APPENDIX B - USER NOTIFICATION WARNING BANNER) to users before granting access to the system that provides privacy and security notices consistent with applicable laws, executive orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines and state that:
1. Users are accessing a U.S. Government system;
2. System usage may be monitored, recorded, and subject to audit;
3. Unauthorized use of the system is prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties;
and
4. Use of the system indicates consent to monitoring and recording;
11 Education Sciences Reform Public Law 107-279
Version 5.5 13
b. Retain the notification message or banner on the screen until users acknowledge the usage conditions and take explicit actions to log on to or further access the system.
c. For publicly accessible systems:
1. Display system use information when accessed via logon interfaces with human users, before granting further access to the publicly accessible system;
2. Display references, if any, to monitoring, recording, or auditing that are consistent with privacy accommodations for such systems that generally prohibit those activities; and
3. Include a description of the authorized uses of the system.
Control Overlay AC-08 ED-01 (L, M, H): The System Use Notification or Warning Banner shall be documented and implemented before an Authorization to Operate (ATO) is issued or if during change management a new site or existing site is changed that would necessitate the re-validation that the banner is still implemented and presented to users of internet-accessible production web applications and ED websites.
2.9 AC-10 Concurrent Session Control (H)
Limit the number of concurrent sessions for each standard user, power user, privileged user, service account and machine account to the number of sessions required by specific role to perform essential duties as documented and approved by the ISSO.
2.10 AC-11 Device Lock (M, H)
a. Prevent further access to the system by initiating a device lock after fifteen (15) minutes of inactivity and requiring the user to initiate a device lock before leaving the system unattended;
and
b. Retain the device lock until the user reestablishes access using established identification and authentication procedures.
2.10.1 AC-11(01) Device Lock | Pattern-Hiding Displays (M, H)
Conceal, via the device lock, information previously visible on the display with a publicly viewable image.
2.11 AC-12 Session Termination (M, H)
Automatically terminate a user session after:
a. Fifteen (15) minutes of session inactivity within user-initiated application sessions;
b. Targeted responses to certain types of incidents; and
c. Time-of-day restrictions on system use, if implemented.
Version 5.5 14
2.11.1 AC-12(01) Session Termination | User-Initiated Logouts
Provide a logout capability for user-initiated communications sessions whenever authentication is used to gain access to sensitive information (e.g., personally identifiable information [PII], FTRI).
2.12 AC-14 Permitted Actions Without Identification or Authentication (L, M, H)
a. Identify specific actions based upon an assessment of risk that can be performed on the system without identification or authentication consistent with organizational mission and business functions; and
b. Document and provide supporting rationale in the security plan for the system, user actions not requiring identification or authentication.
2.13 AC-17 Remote Access (L, M, H)
a. Establish and document usage restrictions, configuration/connection requirements, and implementation guidance for each type of remote access allowed; and
b. Authorize each type of remote access to the system prior to allowing such connections.
2.13.1 AC-17(01) Remote Access | Monitoring and Control (M, H)
Employ automated mechanisms to monitor and control remote access methods.
2.13.2 AC-17(02) Remote Access | Protection of Confidentiality and Integrity Using Encryption (M, H)
Implement cryptographic mechanisms to protect the confidentiality and integrity of remote access sessions.
2.13.3 AC-17(03) Remote Access | Managed Access Control Points (M, H)
Route remote accesses through authorized and managed network access control points.
2.13.4 AC-17(04) Remote Access | Privileged Commands and Access (M, H)
a. Authorize the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only in a format that provides assessable evidence and for the following needs: ISO, ISSO, and/or AO approved special cases for remote administration and maintenance tasks; and
b. Document the rationale for remote access in the security plan for the system.
2.13.5 AC-17(09) Remote Access | Disconnect or Disable Access
Provide the capability to disconnect or disable remote access to the system within timelines commensurate with the situational need as identified by the ISO, ISSO, and/or AO.
Version 5.5 15
2.14 AC-18 Wireless Access (L, M, H)
a. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements, and implementation guidance for each type of wireless access; and
b. Authorize each type of wireless access to the system prior to allowing such connections.
2.14.1 AC-18(01) Wireless Access | Authentication and Encryption (M, H)
Protect wireless access to the system using authentication of users and devices and FIPS validated encryption.
2.14.2 AC-18(03) Wireless Access | Disable Wireless Networking (M, H)
Disable, when not intended for use, wireless networking capabilities embedded within system components prior to issuance and deployment.
2.14.3 AC-18(04) Wireless Access | Restrict Configurations by Users (H)
Identify and explicitly authorize users allowed to independently configure wireless networking capabilities.
2.14.4 AC-18(05) Wireless Access | Antennas and Transmission Power Levels (H)
Select radio antennas and calibrate transmission power levels to reduce the probability that signals from wireless access points can be received outside of organization-controlled boundaries.
2.15 AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices (L, M, H)
a. Establish configuration requirements, connection requirements, and implementation guidance for organization-controlled mobile devices, to include when such devices are outside of controlled areas; and
b. Authorize the connection of mobile devices to organizational systems.
2.15.1 AC-19(05) Access Control for Mobile Devices | Full Device and Container-based Encryption (M, H)
Employ full device encryption whenever possible, or with written AO authorization, container encryption when full device is not possible to protect the confidentiality and integrity of information on ED-approved and authorized mobile devices and services.
2.16 AC-20 Use of External Systems (L, M, H)
a. Establish, maintain and monitor Interconnection Security Agreements (ISAs), Inter Agency Agreements (IAA) and other agreements with external agencies per NIST SP 800-47 and ED policies and standards including ACSD-OFO-05112, Interagency Agreements and ACSD-
12 Also known as OPEDP:1-101
Version 5.5 16
OCIO-00213, Controlled Unclassified Information Program; and establish, maintain and monitor other binding agreements with employees and contractors which include ED-defined controls to be implemented on personally owned systems, components, or devices consistent with trust relationships established with other organizations owning, operating, and/or maintaining external systems, allowing authorized individuals to:
1. Access the system from external systems; and
2. Process, store, or transmit organization-controlled information using external systems
b. Prohibit the use of external systems not covered by a current ISA, IAA, or other agreements with external agencies.
2.16.1 AC-20(01) Use of External Systems | Limits on Authorized Use (M, H)
Permit authorized individuals to use an external system to access the system or to process, store, or transmit organization-controlled information only after:
a. Verification of the implementation of controls on the external system as specified in the Department system specific security and privacy plans;
or
b. Retention of approved system connection or processing agreements with the organizational entity hosting the external system.
2.16.2 AC-20(02) Use of External Systems | Portable Storage Devices Restricted Use (M, H)
Restrict the use of organization-controlled portable storage devices by authorized individuals on external systems using governance policies and procedures, and when available automated technology which prohibits the use of any external system that is not ED owned or authorized including the use of personally owned or corporate-owned systems and services.
2.16.3 AC-20(03) Use of External Systems | Non-Organizationally Owned Systems Restricted Use (Control Overlay)
Not applicable to Privacy Baseline or Security Control Baseline for Low, Moderate, or High systems; control overlays apply.
Control Overlay AC-20(03) ED-01 (L, M, H): Prohibit conducting official ED business using personal or corporate email accounts if an official Department email account has been assigned.
Control Overlay AC-20(03) ED-02 (L, M, H): Prohibit configuring Department email accounts to auto-forward to non-ED.gov email addresses, by an email administrator or an end user, without formal approval by the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO), Enterprise Technology Services (ETS).
13 Also known as OCIO: 3-113
Version 5.5 17
Control Overlay AC-20(03) ED-03 (L, M, H): Prohibit the use of any external system or device that is not ED owned or authorized including the use of personally owned or corporate-owned systems and services unless specifically authorized as an exception by the Enterprise Program Management Review (EPMR)/Enterprise Architecture Technology Insertion, also known as EA
(TI).
2.16.4 AC-20(05) Use of External Systems | Portable Storage Devices Prohibited Use
Prohibit the use of organization-controlled portable storage devices by authorized individuals on external systems.
2.17 AC-21 Information Sharing (M, H)14
a. Enable authorized users to determine whether access authorizations assigned to a sharing restricted in some manner based on some formal or administrative determination including but not limited to contract-sensitive information, privileged information, proprietary information, and personally identifiable information; and
b. Employ non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and when feasible automated processes which use information flow and security attributes to assist users in making information sharing and collaboration decisions.
2.18 AC-22 Publicly Accessible Content (L, M, H)
a. Designate individuals authorized to make information publicly accessible;
b. Train authorized individuals to ensure that publicly accessible information does not contain nonpublic information;
c. Review the proposed content of information prior to posting onto the publicly accessible system to ensure that nonpublic information is not included; and
d. Review the content on the publicly accessible system for nonpublic information annually (i.e., each fiscal year) and remove such information, if discovered.
2.19 AC-23 Data Mining Protection
Employ data mining prevention and detection techniques for data storage objects to detect and protect against unauthorized data mining.
14 AC-21 has been identified by NIST SP 800-53B as supporting only confidentiality and may be downgraded to the corresponding control in a lower baseline (or modified or eliminated if defined in a lower baseline) only if the downgrading action reflects the security category for the supported confidentiality security objective defined impact level.
Version 5.5 18
3 RISK ACCEPTANCE/POLICY EXCEPTIONS
Deviations from the Department policies, Instructions, Standards, Procedures or Memos must be introduce additional risks to the enterprise must be submitted through the Department Risk Acceptance Form (RAF) and must be approved by the ED CISO (as delegated). Requests must justify the reason for the deviation(s)/exception(s) as well as the compensating security controls implemented to secure the device or information, if applicable. Policy deviations that do not introduce additional risks do not need to be submitted through the Department RAF but will need to be approved by the Department CISO (as delegated).
Version 5.5 40
APPENDIX B - USER NOTIFICATION WARNING BANNER
Following is the standard warning banner/system-use notification that should be presented to users of internet-accessible production web applications and ED websites with the exception of IES websites that adhere to the Education Science Reform Act.
Warning
You are accessing a U.S. Federal Government computer system intended to be solely accessed by individual users expressly authorized to access the system by the U.S. Department of Education.
Usage may be monitored, recorded, and/or subject to audit. For security purposes and in order to ensure that the system remains available to all expressly authorized users, the U.S. Department of Education monitors the system to identify unauthorized users. Anyone using this system expressly consents to such monitoring and recording.
Unauthorized use of this information system is prohibited and subject to criminal and civil penalties. Except as expressly authorized by the U.S. Department of Education, unauthorized attempts to access, obtain, upload, modify, change, and/or delete information on this system are strictly prohibited and are subject to criminal prosecution under 18 U.S.C § 1030, and other applicable statutes, which may result in fines and imprisonment. For purposes of this system, unauthorized access includes, but is not limited to: Any access by an employee or agent of a commercial entity, or other third party, who is not the individual user, for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain (regardless of whether the commercial entity or third party is providing a service to an authorized user of the system); and Any access in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or any State. If system monitoring reveals information indicating possible criminal activity, such evidence may be provided to law enforcement personnel.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .