Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M221QNMAN0114
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template to be used for evaluation of contractors under solicitation number 1305M221QNMAN0114 for drydocking and repairs to NOAA Ship FAIRWEATHER. The questionnaire includes sections to assess quality of service, schedule, and management on a scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. Respondents are to provide comments for each section and sign at the bottom. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to the NOAA contracting specialist Bridget Cofo by July 26 at 12:00 PM EST to be considered as part of the past performance evaluation under the solicitation. The solicitation is for drydocking and repair services to be provided to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration vessel NOAA Ship FAIRWEATHER. Interested parties should contact the NOAA contracting staff to request reference documents and drawings applicable to the requirement.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: _______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)
Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________
Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________
Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than July 26, 12:00 PM EST
QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
1305M221QNMAN0114
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
Attachment III
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name:
Rater’s Signature:
Date:
Send Completed Questionnaire to bridget.cofo@noaa.gov no later than July 26, 12:00 PM EST.
Attachment III
1305M221QNMAN0114
mailto:bridget.cofo@noaa.gov
| 1. QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2. SCHEDULE |
| 3. MANAGEMENT |
| ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY: |
| Untitled |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .