Attachment G - RFP No. S-19800-00014589_Final.pdf

PDF 200 KB Posted

Attached to
Website Accessibility Audit - OJD Public Facing Content
Solicitation number
S-19800-00014589
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is a Responsibility Inquiry form (Attachment G) for Request for Proposal (RFP) No. S-19800-00014589 issued by the Oregon Judicial Department (OJD) for a Digital Accessibility Audit of Public Facing Content. The form is designed to assess a proposer's qualifications, financial stability, and legal standing prior to contract award, with the potential for OJD to request additional documentation such as financial statements, performance records, and resource capabilities.

The seven-section inquiry requires proposers to disclose critical business information, including their ability to meet contractual responsibilities, past contract performance, any criminal or civil charges, contract terminations, outstanding judgments, bankruptcy actions, and compliance with pay equity requirements. The form serves as a comprehensive vetting tool to determine a proposer's responsibility and eligibility for the digital accessibility audit project, with the understanding that failure to provide complete and accurate information may result in disqualification from the bidding process.

View the file

Other files

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP No. S-19800-00014589 – Digital Accessibility Audit – OJD Public Facing Content Attachment G

Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT G - RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY

OJD will determine responsibility of a Proposer prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, OJD may notify Proposer of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in OJD finding of non-responsibility and rejection.

1. Does Proposer have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Proposer to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .

2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature to the services requested under the RFP has Proposer completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Proposer′s control, Proposer stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party? Number: ____

How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.

Response:

3. Within the last three years has Proposer (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Proposer’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:

• obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract,

• violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids or Proposals, or

• embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.

Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 2 of 3

4. Within the last three years, has Proposer had:

• any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or

• any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .

If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)

5. Does Proposer have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .

6. Within the last three years, has Proposer filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it?

YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.

7. Pay Equity Certificate. This certificate is required if Proposer employs 50 or more full-time workers and the prospective contract price is estimated to exceed $500,000. Does a current authorized representative of Proposer possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services?

YES / NO .

If the certificate was provided with the Bid or Proposal submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” or “see Proposal” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.

Version 1.0 – December 9, 2016 Page 3 of 3

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Proposer certifies to the best of their knowledge and belief that the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.

Proposer Name: RFP:

Project Name:

Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Title

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .