Attachment G.pdf
PDF 226 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LAS/PBS Data Application Migration
- Solicitation number
- RFP-05004
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This document is the Attachment G Technical Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria for the LAS/PBS Data Application Migration contract opportunity issued by the Florida Executive Office of the Governor (EOG), Systems Design and Development. The solicitation requires qualified vendors to submit responses that will be evaluated based on criteria across four tabs: Executive Summary, Experience and References; Management Plan; Technical Plan; and Key Personnel. Vendors will be scored 1-5 on each criterion and the weighted total scores will determine the evaluation. The contract opportunity is for the data application migration for the Legislative Appropriations System/Planning and Budgeting Subsystem (LAS/PBS).
The pricing terms, set-asides, incumbents, current environment, funding requirements and sources are not explicitly detailed in this document. However, the document indicates that the solicitation will be administered through the Vendor Information Portal (VIP) and that failure to file a protest within the prescribed timeframe will constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment G Technical Proposal Instructions and Evaluation Criteria
INSTRUCTIONS
Each evaluator should read all Responses before attempting to assign scores to any one Response. Evaluators must score each Respondent being evaluated on a separate score sheet.
Throughout the evaluation process, the confidentiality and security of the Responses and the scoring process must be maintained.
Response Evaluation – The evaluators will independently score the Technical Response (Tabs B-D). The evaluators will not review or evaluate any other tabs of the Response.
Respondents will be scored 1-5 on the criteria outlined in the Vendor Scorecard. A score between 1-5 will be assigned to each criteria in the scorecard. The average score from each tab will be multiplied by their weight and then doubled. The total maximum score is 9. Only whole numbers will be assigned to each criteria.
Scoring should reflect the evaluator’s independent evaluation of the Respondent’s overall response based on each criterion and should consider the Respondent’s ability to meet each function, characteristic, performance level, or specification described in the solicitation. A Respondent who exceeds the function, characteristic, performance level, or specification described in the solicitation should receive a higher score than a Respondent who merely meets the function, characteristic, performance level, or specification.
The number of Vendors listed on the Vendor Scorecard is only used as an example.
Once the evaluator has completed a score sheet for each Response, the evaluator will submit the completed score sheets to the Procurement Officer.
LAS/PBS Data Application Migration - EOG-RFP-23-02
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Technical Approach - Respondent's proposed deliverables and timeline Verfiable and quantifiable deliverables and timeline
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
CRITERIA SCORES WEIGHT WEIGHTED
SCORE
WEIGHTED
NOTES
A. Executive Summary, Experience and References 0.10 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
B. Management Plan 0.30 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
C. Technical Plan 0.50 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Score 0.90 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
*Score Example based on 5 points maximum A = 90 to 100% of max. points = Score of 5 B = 80 to 89% of max. points = Score of 4 C = 70 to 79% of max. points = Score of 3 D = 60 to 69% of max. points = Score of 2 F = 0 to 59% of max. points = Score of 1
Average Score Service Level Agreement Including scope requirements and compliance with Statute
Technical Approach - Respondent's ability to meet all requirements Capabilities to accomplish Scope of Services
Admin & Mgmt - Control Costs / Financial Viability Methodology of controlling costs
Admin & Mgmt - Services Reliability Methods to providing reliable service
Technical Approach - Questions Responses Completeness and accuracy
Key Personnel - Names and Resume of each person Names and Resumes (incl certifications)
Key Personnel - Role, Responsibilites and Functions of each person Specific roles / skills and functions
Key Personnel - Allocation of each person to this project Percentage of time of each person to be devoted to project
Key Personnel - Assigned tasks for each person Specific tasks
Technical Approach - General Requirements Understanding the Business Requirements, Vision & Scope
References At least 3 separate and verifiable references or organizations
Subcontractors / Partnerships Completed identification and role
Average Score
Average Score Tab C. Respondent's Management Plan BASIS FOR SCORE
Admin & Mgmt - Management Style and Methodology Management Style, Culture and services/project methodology
Admin & Mgmt - Means of Communication Methods of communication
Admin & Mgmt - Organizational Structure Description of organization's structure
Approach and methodology to accomplish Scope of Services
Admin & Mgmt - Schedule Control & Reliability Methods to control reliable project/work schedule
Admin & Mgmt - Means of Coordination Methods of project teams coordination and work plan
Technical Approach - Solution is sustainable and maintainable Requirements and scope complete
Tab B. Executive Summary, Experience and References BASIS FOR SCORE
CRITERIA
Scores Available from 1-5.
Exec Summary - Written Non-Technical Language Summarize overall capabilities and approach to complete project in clarity
Prior Revelant Experience & Success Verifiable details of prior completion of similar projects
Capabilities and Approaches for accomplishing the services Convincing capabilities and approach
Tab D. Respondent's Technical Plan BASIS FOR SCORE Technical Approach - Purpose
| Evaluator Scorecard - LASPBS Conversion.pdf |
| Vendor Scorecard |
| Evaluator Scorecard - LASPBS Conversion.pdf |
| Vendor Scorecard |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .