Attachment F1 - 437-24-150 - Nurse Call - Asbestos survey 2022 - 214 Pages.pdf

ASBESTOS SURVEY – 2022

Fargo VA Medical Center – Building 1

2101 Elm Street North

Fargo, ND 58102

PREPARED FOR: Ron Tollefson (VA COR) 2101 Elm Street North Fargo, ND 58102

PREPARED BY: TRINE Environmental, Inc. (SDVOSB) 6678 Morningdale Dr.

Brighton, MI

Dan Johnson John R Rogers Asbestos Inspector (ND 6804) President

Fargo VAMC – Building 1

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 2 of 92

Table of Contents

1.0 – INTRODUCTION

2.0 – SITE HISTORY & DESCRIPTION

3.0 – METHODS & LIMITATIONS

3.1 – Asbestos Survey Methods

3.2 – Laboratory Analytical Methods

3.3 – Limitations

4.0 – SURVEY RESULTS

4.1 – Asbestos Analysis Results

Table 1 – Analytical Results

Table 2 – Room by Room

4.2 – Additional Observations

4.3 – Cost Estimate for Asbestos Abatement

5.0 – RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 – Recommendations for Regulated ACM (RACM)

5.2 – Recommendations for Category I Non-Friable ACM (C1NF)

5.3 – Recommendations for Category II Non-Friable ACM (C2NF)

5.4 – General Recommendations

6.0 – SIGNATURE PAGE

APPENDIX A – LABORATORY CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

APPENDIX B – ASBESTOS INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION

file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294739 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294739 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294740 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294740 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294741 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294741 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294742 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294742 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294743 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294743 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294744 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294744 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294745 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294745 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294746 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294746 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294749 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294749 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294750 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294750 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294751 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294751 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294752 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294752 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294753 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294753 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294754 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294754 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294755 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294755 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294756 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294756 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294757 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294757 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294758 file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/%7b01%7d%20AWARDS/%7b22-01%7d%20Award%20Jan%2012%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Asbestos%20Inspection/%7b05%7d%20Asbestos%20Survey%20Reports/DRAFT%20%7b2022%7d%20VAMC%20Fargo%20Bldg.%2003%20-%20without%20Recommendations.docx%23_Toc104294758

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 3 of 92

An asbestos survey was conducted at the Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) Fargo Health Care

System (HCS), 2101 Elm Street North Fargo, ND 58102. The survey was conducted between February 28th and

March 31st, 2022, by Dan Johnson of TRINE Environmental, Inc., an EPA-certified building inspector in the state of

North Dakota.

The purpose of this asbestos survey was to identify the presence, and extent of asbestos containing materials

(ACM) in seventeen (17) buildings, incorporate previously performed asbestos survey, and create a new database in support of future plans to renovate which may require demolition activities. Each building was considered a separate homogenous area (HA).

The inspection was performed by a certified EPA asbestos building inspector, experienced in identifying and sampling suspect ACM. All areas of Building 1 were accessed and inspected.

Suspect materials were sampled to determine asbestos content.

All samples collected were analyzed at EMSL Analytical, Inc., (EMSL) an AIHA and NVLAP accredited asbestos laboratory, using either Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) methods or Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) methods. A total of fifty-eight (58) samples were collected and analyzed.

Laboratory Certificates of Analysis are located in Appendix A of this report. Company and individual licenses and certifications are located in Appendix B.

The Fargo VA HCS campus is made up of 17 buildings that first started construction in 1929 with major expansions in 1945 and 1983 but have also been under constant renovations of various magnitudes over the last 92 years.

Currently the campus has approximately 576,000 interior gross square feet (GSF).

The site was inspected for suspect ACM, unless otherwise noted. Each observed suspect material was assigned a material identification within the homogenous area (HA), such as ceiling tile (CT), floor tile (FT), Thermal System

Insulation (TSI) or miscellaneous (MISC), described, and measured. Each observed suspect material was sampled except for those that were confirmed positive from previous sampling events or determined to non-suspect material. Samples of suspect ACM were collected using procedures established by the United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40 Part 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Containing

Materials in Schools.

3.0 – METHODS & LIMITATIONS

3.1 – Asbestos Survey Methods

2.0 – SITE HISTORY & DESCRIPTION

1.0 – INTRODUCTION

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 4 of 92

Upon completing an initial walkthrough, the asbestos inspector began a thorough inspection identifying probable

ACM and categorizing by material identification. Each material identification represented a group of material having similar characteristics such as appearance, color and manner in which it was used.

ACM’s were divided into three categories:

1. Surfacing Materials: material that is sprayed-on, troweled on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings and fireproofing materials on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing or other purposes

2. Thermal System Insulation (TSI): material applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, or other structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes

3. Miscellaneous ACM: interior building material on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, and does not include surfacing material or thermal insulation

ACM’s inventoried in this survey are classified as either friable or non-friable. Friable ACM can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure whereas non-friable ACM cannot.

The EPA asbestos NESHAP regulation further classifies non-friable ACM into two categories:

1. Category I: Non-friable ACM includes any asbestos-containing packing, gasket, resilient floor covering or asphalt roofing product

2. Category II: Non-friable ACM includes any non-friable ACM other than Category I non-friable ACM

Samples were collected in airtight sealed bags for transportation to EMSL. for analysis. Standard Operating

Procedures dictated samples were collected in manner consistent with health and safety protocols, using personal hygiene methods, using wet methods as required, and donning proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). These methods were used to prevent asbestos airborne contamination from being introduced to the hospital’s atmosphere and to minimize employee, staff, and patient exposure.

Lab data pertaining to the samples analyzed is located in Appendix A of this report and each sample is listed as follows:

• Date Analyzed

• Field Sample #

• Lab Sample #

• Sample Location

• Asbestos Content

• Non-Asbestos Content

Samples were analyzed using PLM methods and Point Count Methods for any sample returning a ≤ 5% (less than or equal to) result, excluding non-detects.

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 5 of 92

All samples collected during the survey were analyzed at EMSL., an A.I.H.A. and NVLAP certified laboratory. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the samples were logged-in and submitted for analysis.

PLM samples were analyzed utilizing the Environmental Protection Agency’s test method: Methods for the determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA 600/R-93/116, July1993) and the McCrone Research

Institute’s The Asbestos Particle Atlas as the principal analytical references. Additional treatment and tests may be required to accurately define composition (i.e. ashing, extraction, acetone treatment, and TEM).

The PLM method utilizes a light microscope equipped with polarizing filters. The identification of asbestos fiber bundles is determined by the visual properties displayed when the sample is treated with various dispersion staining liquids. Identification is substantiated by the actual structure of the fiber and the effect of polarized light on the fiber, all of which is viewed by a trained technician. The limit of detection of asbestos by PLM is about one percent (1%) by area. Samples containing lower levels of asbestos are not reliably detectable by this technique.

Analysis was performed by using the bulk sample for visual observation and slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, and actinolite/tremolite), fibrous non-asbestos constituents (cellulose, synthetic, etc.) and non-fibrous constituents. Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample.

The asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) recommends that asbestos bulk samples that are less than 10% by PLM are to be analyzed by point counting for friable ACM and mandates point counting when PLM results for friable ACM are in trace amounts (< 1%) in order to declare that the material is non-asbestos containing. The point- count procedure mandated by NESHAP is in the EPA “Interim” Bulk Method. For each layer to be point counted, eight mounts are made by dispersing 8 pinches of sample in suitable fluid. Each of the mounts is examined under the polarizing light microscope using an eyepiece reticule that superimposes a grid of points over the field of view. Fifty non- empty points are examined for each mount, yielding 400 points – some of which would be identified as asbestos and the rest as non-asbestos material.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analysis is used to quantify and identify asbestos structures using electron diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Identification of chrysotile or amphibole crystalline structures can be consistently determined via the electron-diffraction capabilities of modern TEMs. The five amphibole types can be differentiated based on their elemental composition when EDX analysis is combined with their electron diffraction patterns.

This asbestos survey report has been prepared by TRINE in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. No other warranty expressed or implied is made. The intent of this survey report is to assist the building owner or management in locating ACM. This document is not intended to be utilized as a proposal or a project design document for the remediation of asbestos materials discovered during this investigation.

3.2 – Laboratory Analytical Methods

3.3 – Limitations

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 6 of 92

The survey was conducted to identify suspect ACM on the interior areas of Building 1. Some ACM may not have been discovered due to inaccessibility. Any suspect materials discovered subsequent to the issue of this survey report should be sampled and analyzed to determine asbestos content and to initiate appropriate responses.

TRINE's interpretations and recommendations are based upon the results of sample collection and analyses in compliance with environmental regulations, quality control and assurance standards, and the scope of work. The results, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report pertain to conditions observed at the time of the survey.

The field observations, measurements, and research reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to form a reasonable basis for an Asbestos Survey Report. The assessment, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are based upon the sample analysis results of collected materials within the Homogenous Area.

They may not represent all conditions at the subject site as they reflect the information gathered from specific locations. TRINE Environmental, Inc. warrants the findings and conclusions contained herein have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted industrial hygiene methodology and only for the site described in this report.

Reliance on or use by any such third-party without explicit authorization in the report does not make said third-party a third-party beneficiary to TRINE’s contract with the VA. Any such unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of its information or conclusions, will be at third-party’s risk. For the same reasons, no warranties or representations, expressed or implied in this report, are made to any such third party.

This report has been developed to provide the client with information regarding apparent conditions relating to the subject property. Although TRINE believes that the findings and conclusions provided in this report are reasonable, the report is necessarily limited to the conditions observed and to the information available at the time of the work.

Due to the nature of the work, there is a possibility conditions exist that could not be identified within the scope of the inspection, or which were not apparent at the time of our site work. The report is also limited to information available from the client at the time it was conducted. It is also possible that the testing methods employed at the time of the report may later be superseded by other methods. TRINE does not accept responsibility for changes in the state of the art.

A total of fifty-eight (58) samples were collected and analyzed by PLM. The original laboratory report and certificate of analysis are located in Appendix A.

The following tables summarize the samples collected and quantity of materials that contain asbestos in amounts

>1% (greater than). Table 1 provides the analytical results of the samples submitted to the laboratory. Table 2 provides a room-by-room breakdown of the materials identified and sample number associated with the analytical results.

4.1 – Asbestos Analysis Results

4.0 – SURVEY RESULTS

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 7 of 92

TABLE LEGEND

NAD: No Asbestos Detected ACM Material with type and percent detected

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 8 of 92

Table 1 – Analytical Results

Sample Numbers

Sample Location Material Description

Exterior Description

Quantity AHERA Material

Category Condition

Potential for Future Damage

Asbestos Content Notes

01-001 Bldg 1 Hallway Outside

Canteen Sheetrock/Tape/

Compound White

1 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-002

Bldg 1 Hallway Outside Canteen

2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Random Fissures/ Pinholes (Drop in)

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-1

01-003 Bldg 1 Hallway Outside

Canteen Vinyl Plank

Flooring Dark Wook Look

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-004 Bldg 1 BC-77 Elevator

Mech Wall Mastic Black

Surfacing Material

Good Little/No 8% Chryotile

01-005A-C Bldg 1 BC-77/BC-

79/BC-85B

Spray on

Fireproofing Lt. Green

3 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-006 Bldg 1 East Entry by

Stairwell #7 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic White w/Black Specks

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-1

01-007 Bldg 1 BC-80 Retail

Store Vinyl Plank

Flooring Lt. Brown Wood Look

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-008 Bldg 1 Corridor Outside

BC-82

2' x 4' Ceiling Tile Random Fissures/

Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-2

01-009 Bldg 1 BC-83 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile Widthwise Fissures w/Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-3

01-010 Bldg 1 BC-69 Vending 2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Long Fissures w/Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-4

01-011 Bldg 1 BC-69 Vending 1" x 1" Ceramic

Floortile Tan/Gray

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-012 BC-91 2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Random Fissures/

Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-5

01-013 Bldg 1 BC-94 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Cream w/White Specks

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-2

01-014 Bldg 1 Main

North/South Corridor 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Gray w/Brown Streaks

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 4% Chrysotile FT FT-3

01-015A-C Bldg 1 BE-05 Mech Spray on

Fireproofing White/Fluffy

1 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-016 Corridor Outside indepenence Elevators 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Cream w/White and

Gray specks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-4

01-017 BE-30 Duct Seam Sealant Black

1 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected Throughout Building 1

01-018

Corridor Outside BE-31 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

Cream w/Brown and White Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-5

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 9 of 92

Numbers

Sample Location Material Description

Exterior Description

Quantity AHERA Material

Category Condition

Potential for Future Damage

Asbestos Content Notes

01-019

BE-44 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

Gray w/Brown and White Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 6% Chrysotile Mastic FT-6

01-020A-C BE-25 Spray on

Fireproofing Gray/Firm

3 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-021 Corridor Outside BE-25 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic White w/Gray Streaks

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-15

01-022 HAC BC-85A 4" Ceramic Wall

Tile Tan

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-023 HAC BC-85A 1" Ceramic Floor

Tile Tan

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-024 BC-74A Canteen

Kitchen 2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Vinyl covered

Sheetrock Look 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-6

01-025 BC-74A Canteen

Kitchen 6" Ceramic Floor

Tile Brown

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-026 BC-74A Canteen

Kitchen 4" Ceramic Wall

Tile Cream

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-027 BD-10 Men's Restroom 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile Deep Lengthwise

Fissures 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-7

01-028 Hallway Outside BC-

1' x 1' Ceiling

Tile/Pucks Large and Small

Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No <1% Amosite/5%

Chrysotile (Pucks)

01-029

Corridor Outside BD-60 2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-8

01-030

Entry by Paint Shop 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

Tan w/Brown/Gray/White

Specks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-7

01-031 1C-70 Sheet Vinyl Floor White 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-032

IC-31 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

White w/Gray/Dark Gray Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-8

01-033 1D-01 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Gray w/White and

Brown Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 4% Chrysotile

FT/10% Chrysotile Mastic

FT-9

01-034 1C-112 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Cream Textured

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-10

01-035 1C-108 Sheet Vinyl Floor Cream w/Blue and Pink

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-036 1E-39 Sheet Vinyl Floor Brown/Gray Mosaic

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-037 1E-25 Sheet Vinyl Floor Wood Look 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 10 of 92

Numbers

Sample Location Material Description

Exterior Description

Quantity AHERA Material

Category Condition

Potential for Future Damage

Asbestos Content Notes

01-038 1D-20 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic White w/Dark Gray

Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-11

01-039

1D-128 Corridor Sheet Vinyl Floor Gray/Rust/ White Mosaic 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-040

1D-44 HAC Sheet Vinyl Floor Lt. Gray w/ Dk Gray and White 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-041 1D-116 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile Small Random

Fissures w/Pinholes 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-9

01-042

2C-77 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

White w/Gray and Black Streaks 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected FT-12

01-043

1D-40 2' x 2' Ceiling Tile Random Fissures/Pinholes (Drop

in) 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-10

01-044 2E-25 Sheet Vinyl Floor Brown/Gray Mosaic 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-045 2E-41 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic Cream w/Gold

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 5%

ChrysotileFT/10% Chrysotile Mastic

FT-13

01-046 2E-41 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile White (Spline) 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-11

01-047 2E-44 2' x 4' Ceiling Tile Deep Random Fissure 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected CT-12

01-048 2D-18 Sheet Vinyl Floor Cream/Tan/ Brown

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-049A-C 3E-45 Spray on

Fireproofing Gray

3 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-050

Stairwell #3 12" x 12" Floortile and Mastic

Tan/Brown/ White

1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 8% Chrysotile

Mastic

FT-14

01-051A-C 4th Floor Corridor

Outside Elevator #4 Spray on Texture White

3 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-052A-G Throughout Spray on

Fireproofing White/Gray

7 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-053 BB-01 9" x 9" Floor Tile and Mastic White w/Red and

Black 1 Miscellaneous Good Little/No 5% Chrysotile (FT)

01-054 BE-45 North Loading

Dock Building Seam

Caulk Gray

Surfacing Material

Good Little/No 3% Chrysotile

01-055 BE-44 Sheetrock/Tape/

Compound White

1 Surfacing Material Good Little/No None Detected

01-056A-G BE-38 Corridor (Throughout)

Hard Plaster Wall White/Gray 7 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-057A-G BE-38/BE-11 Corridors

(Throughout) Hard Plaster

Ceiling White/Gray

7 Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

01-058 BE-46 Fire Stop Red Miscellaneous Good Little/No None Detected

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 11 of 92

Table 2 – Room by Room

Room Number Level Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

Sub- Basement

SB

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 40 LF POOR Assumed Friable Assumed

NE Corner of Room

Sub- Basement

SB

Styrofoam

Panel Adhesive Gold 140 sf Good Assumed Friable Assumed

Above Wood Bridge

BC-75 B

Vinyl Plank

Flooring Dark Wood Look 1,670 sf Good None Detected 01-003

BC-75 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-1 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop-in)

1,670 sf Good None Detected 01-002

BC-74A B

6" Ceramic Floor

Tile 6" Brown 1200 sf Good None Detected 01-025

BC-74A B

4" Ceramic Wall

Tile 4" Beige 2000 sf Good None Detected 01-026

BC-74A B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile CT-6 2'x2'

Vinyl Covered Sheetrock Look

1200 sf Good None Detected 01-024 CT-6

BC-74B B

No Suspect

Materials Found

BC-74 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-1 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop-in)

590 sf Good None Detected 01-002

BC-74 B

12" Ceramic

Floor Tile 12" Tan/Green 590 sf Good

Non- Suspect

New

BC-74 Corridor B Vinyl Plank

Flooring Dark Wood Look 525 sf Good None Detected 01-003

BC-74 Corridor B 2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop-in)

525 sf Good None Detected 01-002

BC-69 B

Thermal System

Insulation White 2 lf POOR Assumed Friable Assumed

Debris in chase behind access panel

BC-69 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

315 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BC-69 B

Vinyl Plank

Flooring Dark Wood Look 315 sf Good None Detected 01-003

Over 1" Ceramic Tile

BC-69 B

1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" Tan/Gray 315 sf Good None Detected 01-011

Under Vinyl Plank Floor

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 12 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BC-77 Elev Mech

B Wall Mastic Black 100sf Good 8% Chrysotile Non-Friable 01-004

BC-77 B

Spray-on

Fireproofing Light Green Good None Detected 01-005A Throughout

BC-79 B

Spray-on

Fireproofing Light Green Good None Detected 01-005B Throughout

East Entry by Mech. BC-79

B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 90 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-80 B

Vinyl Plank

Flooring

Lt. Brown Wood Look

1,285 sf Good None Detected 01-007

BC-80 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-1 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop-in)

1,285 sf Good None Detected 01-002 CT-1

BC-81 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 390 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-83 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 200 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-83 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

200 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

BC-82 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 135 sf Good None Detected 01-006

FT-1 (Under Carpet)

BC-82 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

135 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-82 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 85 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-82 Corridor B 2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

85 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-85A B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

85 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-85A B

1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" Tan 80 sf Good None Detected 01-023

BC-85A B

4" Ceramic Wall

Tile 4" Tan 80 sf Good None Detected 01-022

BC-85B B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 410 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-85B B

Spray-on

Fireproofing Light Green 410 sf Good None Detected 01-005C Throughout

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 13 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BC-85B

Corridor

B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 180 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-85B

Corridor

B 2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

180 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-70 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

155 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-70 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 155 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-68 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-2 2'x4'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

120 sf Good None Detected 01-008 CT-2

BC-68 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 120.sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-64 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

250 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-64 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 250 sf Good FT-2

BC-64 Corridor B 2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

195 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-64 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 195 sf Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

BC-64

Corridor

B 1' x 1' Ceiling

Tile/Pucks 1'x1'

Large/Small Pinholes

16 sf Good <1% Amosite/5%

Chrysotile (Pucks) Friable/Non-

Friable 01-028

BC-63 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

180 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-63 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 180 sf Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

BC-66 Corridor B 2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

150 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-66 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 150 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BC-66 B

1" x 1" Ceramic Floor/wall Tile

1"x1" Tan 95 sf Good New

BC-66 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

95 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-67 B

1" x 1" Ceramic Floor/wall Tile

1"x1" Tan 125 sf Good New

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 14 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BC-67 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

125 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-89 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

155 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BC-89 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 10 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed In Chase

BC-90 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-10 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop in)

297 sf Good None Detected 01-043 Abated/Remodeled

BC-90 B

Vinyl Plank

Flooring Rustic Look 150 sf New

Non- Suspect

Abated/Remodeled

BC-90A B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-10 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes (Drop in)

125 sf Good None Detected 01-043 Abated/Remodeled

BC-91 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

200 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BC-91 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 200 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BC-93 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

200 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BC-93 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 200 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BC-94 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

440 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-94 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 440 sf Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

BC-95 B

1" x 1" Ceramic Floor/wall Tile

1"x1" Tan/Green 250 sf Good New

BC-95 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-5 2'x2'

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

200 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BC-95 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-5 2'x2'

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

330 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BC-96 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

150 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BC-96 B

Ceramic Wall

Tile White 50 sf Good New

BC-96 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 150 sf Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

Main North/South

Corridor B

12" X 12" Floortile and

Mastic FT-3 12"x12"

Gray w/Brown Streaks

1550 sf Good 4% Chrysotile (FT) Non-Friable 01-014 Possible 2 layers

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 15 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

Main North/South

Corridor B

Thermal System

Insulation White 1 lf POOR Assumed Friable Assumed

Open End-By Small

Independence Elevator

BE-03 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-4

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

130 sf Good None Detected 01-010 CT-4

BE-03 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-1 12"x12" White w/Black

Specks 130 sf Good None Detected 01-006 FT-1

BE-05 B

Spray-on

Fireproofing White Fluffy 1200 sf None Detected 01-015A-C

BE-05 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 2 lf Good In Ceiling/Riser

Corridor Outside

Independence Elevators

B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-4 12"x12" Cream w/White and

Gray specks 350 sf Good None Detected 01-017

BE-30 B

Duct Seam

Sealant Black 50 lf Good

BE-31 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-5 12"x12" Cream w/Brown and

White 800 sf Good None Detected 01-018

BE-31 B

BE-34 B

BE-35 B

Tile CT-5 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

150 sf Good CT-5

BE-35 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 150 sf Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

BE-35 B

Ceramic

Floor/Wall Tile White/Green 30 sf Good

BE-38C B

Ceramic Wall

Tile Tan 30 sf Good None Detected 01-022

BE-38C B

1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" Tan 30 sf Good None Detected 01-023

BE-38C B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-5 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

30 sf Good CT-5

BE-38 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-5 2'x2'

Random Fissures w/Pinholes

720 sf Good CT-5

BE-38 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 720 Good None Detected 01-013 FT-2

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 16 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BE-38A B

Ceramic Wall

Tile Tan 50 sf Good None Detected 01-022

BE-38A B

1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" Tan 125 sf Good None Detected 01-023

BE-38B B

Ceramic Wall

Tile Tan 50 sf Good None Detected 01-022

BE-38B B

1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" Tan 125 sf Good None Detected 01-023

BE-40 B

BE-42 B

BE-45 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 35 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed Above Ceiling

BE-45 North Loading Dock

B Building Seam

Caulk Gray 120lf Good 3% Chrysotile Non-Friable 01-054

BE-46 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 20 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed In Wall

BE-47 B

BE-50 B

BE-50

Corridor

B Thermal System

Insulation Gray 16 lf POOR Assumed Friable Assumed

In Wall Behind Drinking

Fountain-Open Ends

Stairwell # 1 B Thermal System

Insulation Gray 16 lf POOR Assumed Friable Assumed

Open Ends in Wall

Stairwell # 1 B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-5 12"x12" Cream w/Brown and

White 65 sf Good None Detected 01-018

BE-44 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 10 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed In wall SW Corner

BE-44 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-6 12"x12" Gray w/Brown and

White Streaks 130 sf Good

6% Chrysotile (Mastic)

Non-Friable 01-019 Black Mastic

BE-44A B

BE-07 B

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 17 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BE-35 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 670 sf Good None Detected 01-021 Corridor Only

BE-20 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 615 sf Good None Detected 01-021

BB-01 B 9" x 9" Floortile 9"x9" White w/Red and

Black 6 sf Good 5% Chrysotile FT Non-Friable 01-053 Electrical Closet

BB-03 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-5 12"x12" Cream w/Brown and

White 80 sf Good None Detected 01-018

BE-02 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-2 12"x12" Cream w/White

Specks 70 sf Good None Detected 01-013

BE-02 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

70 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

Stairwell #3 B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-5 12"x12" Cream w/Brown and

White 100 sf Good None Detected 01-018

BD-02 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 15 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed Accessible

BD-04 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

410 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

BD-04 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 410 sf Good None Detected 01-021

BD-05 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

160 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

BD-05 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-6 12"x12" Gray w/Brown and

White Streaks 160 sf Good

6% Chrysotile (Mastic)

Non-Friable 01-019 Black Mastic

BD-06 B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 1 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed Accessible

BD-06 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-4 12"x12" Cream w/White and

Gray specks 110 sf Good None Detected 01-017

BD-06 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

110 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

BD-05 B 9" x 9" Floortile 9"x9" White w/Red and

Black 150 sf Good 5% Chrysotile FT Non-Friable 01-053 Accessible

BE-10 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-3 2'x4'

Widthwisw Fissures w/Pinholes

262 sf Good None Detected 01-009 CT-3

BE-10 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-6 12"x12" Gray w/Brown and

White Streaks 262 sf Good

6% Chrysotile (Mastic)

Non-Friable 01-019 Black Mastic

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 18 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BE-10 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 390 sf Good None Detected 01-021

BD-08 B 9" x 9" Floortile 9"x9" White w/Red and

Black 220 sf Good 5% Chrysotile FT Non-Friable 01-053 Accessible

BD-10 B

2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-7 2'x4'

Deep Lengthwise Fissures

107 sf Good None Detected 01-027 CT-7

BD-10 Men's Restroom

B 4" Ceramic Wall

Tile 4" White/Gold 150 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed

BD-10 Men's Restroom

B 1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" White/Gold 150 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed

BD-11 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 400 sf Good None Detected 01-021

BD-12

Women's Restroom

B 2' x 4' Ceiling

Tile CT-7 2'x4'

Deep Lengthwise Fissures

140 sf Good None Detected 01-027 CT-7

BD-12

Women's Restroom

B 4" Ceramic Wall

Tile 4" White/Gold 200 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed

BD-12

Women's Restroom

B 1" Ceramic Tile

Flooring 1" White/Gold 200 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed

Main Engineering

Corridor B

12" X 12" Floortile and

Mastic 12"x12"

Tan w/Brown/Gray/White

Specks 485 sf Good

Main Engineering

Corridor B

2' x 2' Ceiling Tile

CT-4 2'x2' Long Fissures w/Pinholes 485 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-31 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

127 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-33 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

127 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

Main Corridor West Outside

BD-34

B

Thermal System

Insulation Gray 2 lf Good Assumed Friable Assumed Stubs in wall

BD-34 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-4 12"x12" Cream w/White and

Gray specks 300 sf Good None Detected 01-017

BD-34 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

300 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-35 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

110 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-36 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

147 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 19 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BD-37 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

98 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-38 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

148 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-39 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

148 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-40 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

148 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-41 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

112 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-42 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

143 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-43 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

112 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-45 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

108 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-47 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

118 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-50 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

842 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-50A B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

156 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

BD-50D B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-4 2'x2'

Long Fissures w/Pinholes

204 sf Good None Detected 01-0010

Corridor Outside BD-23

B 2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

86 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

Corridor Outside BD-23

B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-15 12"x12" White w/Grey

Streaks 86 sf Good None Detected 01-021 Black Mastic

BD-23 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

130 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BD-23 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 130 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BD-22 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

304 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BD-22 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 304 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BD-21 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures

257 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 20 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BD-21 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 257 sf Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BD-20 B

2" x 2" Ceiling

Tile

CT-5

Ramdom Fissures w/Pinholes

192 sf Good None Detected 01-012 CT-5

BD-20 B

Residual Black

Mastic Black 192 sfr Good Assumed Non-Friable Assumed Under Carpet

BD-60 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

207 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

207 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60A B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

96 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60A B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

96 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60B B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

132 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60B B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

132 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60C B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

429 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60C B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

429 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60D B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

935 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60D B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

935 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60E B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

76 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60E B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

76 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-60 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

275 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-60 Corridor B 2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

275 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-61 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White

146 sf Good None Detected 01-030

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 21 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BD-61 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

146 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-62 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

262 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-62 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

262 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-63 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

314 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-63 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

314 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-63A B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

135 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-63A B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

135 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-63A1 B

BD-65 B

BD-65A B

BD-65 Corridor B 12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

624 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-65 Corridor B 2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

624 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-70 B

BD-75A B

BD-75B B

BD-70

North/South

Corridor B

12" X 12" Floortile and

Mastic FT-7 12"x12"

Tan w/Brown/Gray/White

Specks 913 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-70

North/South

Corridor B

2' x 2' Ceiling Tile

CT-8 2'x2' Small Random

Fissures w/Pinholes 913 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-80 B

Fargo VAMC – Asbestos Survey 2022 Page 22 of 92

Suspect Material Present

Material Identification

Size Exterior

Description Quantity Condition Asbestos Content Friability

Sample Reference

Notes

BD-81 B

12" X 12"

Floortile and Mastic

FT-7 12"x12" Tan w/Brown/Gray/White Specks

57 sf Good None Detected 01-030

BD-81 B

2' x 2' Ceiling

Tile CT-8 2'x2'

Small Random Fissures w/Pinholes

57 sf Good None Detected 01-029

BD-83 B

BD-83 B

BD-84 B

BD-85A B

BD-85B B

BD-86 B

BD-90 B

BD-91…