Attachment_D_References-OregonBuys Bid Number S-DASOBO-00003117_Statewide Disparity Study.doc
DOC document 40 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Statewide Disparity Study -Notice of Award
- Solicitation number
- S-DASOBO-00003832
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Reference Check Form for RFP [###-####-##] - [RFP title] related to OregonBuys Bid Number S-DASOBO-00003117 for a Statewide Disparity Study. The form is to be completed by a Reference Entity and submitted with the Proposer's proposal. The form requests information on the Proposer's strengths, areas for improvement, processes and practices used to include community members, and ratings on the Proposer's overall quality of services, commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, responsiveness to customer service, ability to stay on schedule and budget, and accuracy of work.
The related state and local contract opportunity is for the Statewide Disparity Study, which was incorrectly awarded to the wrong Proposer initially, and this Notice of Award # S-DASOBO-00003832 is being issued to correct the error and award the solicitation to the winning Proposer. The jurisdictions involved are Marion County and the City of Salem.
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
OregonBuys Bid Number S-DASOBO-00003117–Statewide Disparity Study
Att D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
This Reference Check Form must be completed by the Reference Entity and returned to the Proposer:
Completed reference forms must be submitted with Proposer’s Proposal or it will not be scored.
Please respond to the following questions.
Please provide a project name and a brief description of the services provided by Proposer:
What strengths did Proposer bring to your project?
What areas of service does Proposer need to improve?
What processes and practices did Proposer intentionally use to include community members?
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-5:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
4. How well did Proposer stay on schedule?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
5. How well did Proposer stay within budget?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
6. Considering data and attention to detail, please rate the accuracy of the work provided by Proposer.
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________ Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .