Attachment D.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson Dry Dock Ship Repair
Solicitation number
1305M221QNMAN0111
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for ship repair services. The past performance questionnaire is seeking input on a contractor's performance on a previous contract and includes ratings for quality of service, schedule, and management. Respondents are to provide comments for each category and return the completed questionnaire to the identified contracting specialist by August 11, 2021.

The solicitation is for repair work on the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson during dry dock and seeks quotes to be submitted under solicitation number 1305M221QNMAN0111. The requiring agency is the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. The opportunity type is listed as a solicitation and additional details are provided in the attached request for quote. No further information is included on the required scope of work, pricing terms, or response deadline.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
TJFY22 Dry Docking and Repairs 20210804.pdf PDF
TJ FY22DD new references 20210804.zip ZIP file
Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment D.1 NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON FY22 DRYDOCK SPECIFICATION_REVISED 7.21.2021.pdf PDF
Summary of Changes 7.21.2021.docx DOCX document
TJ FY22DD new references 20210721.zip ZIP file
Attachment D.5 Price Schedule-Revised 7.21.2021.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TJ FY22DD new references 20210713.zip ZIP file
Summary of Changes 7.13.2021.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment D.1 NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON FY22 DRYDOCK SPECIFICATION_REVISED 7.13.2021.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
TJ FY22DD References - Manuals 1 of 2.zip ZIP file
TJ FY22DD References - Manuals 2 of 2.zip ZIP file
TJ FY22DD References - Drawings 2 of 2.zip ZIP file
TJ FY22DD Refereences - Other.zip ZIP file
TJ FY22DD References - Drawings 1 of 2.zip ZIP file
TJ FY22DD References - Standard Specifications.zip ZIP file
Attachment D.1 NOAA Ship THOMAS JEFFERSON FY22 DRYDOCK SPECIFICATION.pdf PDF
Attachment D.4 US DOL POSTER.pdf PDF
Attachment D.2 Past Performance Information Form.rtf RTF text file
RFQ_1305M221QNMAN0111.pdf PDF
Attachment D.5 Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M221QNMAN0111 Attachment: D.3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Shaun Squyres (Shaun.Squyres@noaa.gov) no later than August 11, 2021 at 1:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Shaun Squyres, no later than August 11, 2021 1:00 pm Eastern Time:

Shaun.Squyres@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .