Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

P812 Provide Ship to Shore Electrical Substations at Pier #1 Naval Station, Rota, Spain

ATTACHMENT C

N624 70-20-R-4005

NA VFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: Entity Identifier Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: D Prime Contractor D Sub Contractor D Joint Venture D Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone#):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: D Firm Fixed Price D Cost Reimbursement D Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work D High □ Med D Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client's role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client's Signature:

NOTE: NA VF AC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES TffiS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT

THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE TffiS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC

SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE ffiGHL Y ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFER OR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE

SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NA VFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NA VFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES TIIE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY

AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

N624 70-20-R-4005

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and An Exceptional rating is appropriate when exceeds many to the Government/Owner's benefit. the Contractor successfully performed The contractual performance of the element or sub- multiple significant events that were of element being assessed was accomplished with few benefit to the Government/Owner. A minor problems for which corrective actions taken singular benefit, however, could be of such by the contractor was highly effective. magnitude that it alone constitutes an

Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO simificant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and A Very Good rating is appropriate when the exceeds some to the Government's/Owner's Contractor successfully performed a benefit. The contractual performance of the element significant event that was a benefit to the or sub-element being assessed was accomplished Government/Owner. There should have been with some minor problems for which corrective no significant weaknesses identified.

actions taken by the contractor were effective.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when requirements. The contractual performance of the there were only minor problems, or major element or sub-element contains some minor problems that the contractor recovered from problems for which corrective actions taken by the without impact to the contract. There should contractor appear or were satisfactory. have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual A Marginal is appropriate when a requirements. The contractual performance of the significant event occurred that the contractor element or sub-element being assessed reflects a had trouble overcoming which impacted the serious problem for which the contractor has not yet Government/Owner.

identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely multiple significant events occurred that the manner. The contractual performance of the contractor had trouble overcoming and element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) which impacted the Government/Owner. A for which the contractor's corrective actions appear singular problem, however, could be of such or were ineffective. serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Annlicable No information or did not annly to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

N624 70-20-R-4005

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ____________________ _ Client Information (Name): ________________________ _

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG s M

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG s M

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive E VG s M customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on E VG s M performance)

2. SCHEDULEITTMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or E VG s M the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks E VG s M identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG s M

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; E VG s M responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned E VG s M with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG s M

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of E VG s M subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG s M

c) Government Property Control E VG s M

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG s M

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG s M

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG s M

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or E VG s M priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, E VG s M manage and control the program)

S. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed E VG s M u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N u N price(s)?

N624 70-20-R-4005

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ____________________ _ Client Information (Name): _______________________ _

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG s M cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance E VG s M with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and Yes tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending

Yes terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial Yes problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

E VG s M (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safetv, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and E VG s M personnel security requirements.

7.GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner E VG s M regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG s M

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this E VG s M contractor.

u N u N

No

No

No u N u N u N u N

No u N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):