Attachment_C-_Asbestos_Survey.pdf

Geotechnical & Geophysical Engineering | Environmental | Occupational Health & Safety| Building Code Compliance Drilling Services | Construction Materials Testing | Threshold Inspection | Facilities Consulting

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

Conducted on:

5041 Frederick Avenue

Brevard County, Melbourne, Florida 32904

UES Project NoA25146.01532.000 UES Report No. 2155302

Survey Date: July 31, 2025 Report Date: August 12, 2025

Prepared for:

Brevard County Public Works

2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way

Viera, Florida 32940

Attention: Mr. Robby Hendricks.

Prepared by:

UES Professional Solutions LLC.

820 Brevard Avenue

Rockledge, Florida 32955

(321) 638-0808

Business License No. ZA-0000017 www.Team UES.com

ATTACHMENT C - ASBESTOS SURVEY

http://www.team/ http://www.team/ Jessica Ciardulli Cross-Out

820 Brevard Avenue | Rockledge, FL 32955 | p 321-638-0808 | f 407-638-0978 | www.TeamUES.com

August 12, 2025

Brevard County Public Works 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way Brevard County Viera, Florida 32940

Reference: ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY

5041 Fredrick Avenue West Melbourne, Florida 32904 UES Project No. A25146.01532.0000 UES Report No. 2155302

Dear Mr. Hendricks

On behalf of Brevard County Public Works (the “client”), UES Professional Solutions (UES) has completed this National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Asbestos Containing Materials Building Survey Report. This survey was conducted in accordance with Chapter 61-145 of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for the above-referenced property (the “subject property). UES performed this ACM survey on Thursday, July 31, 2025, to categorize and assess readily available suspect homogeneous material within the subject building. UES collected eighteen (18) bulk samples from nine (09) homogeneous materials.

The bulk samples were transported to a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory and analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for the presence of asbestos fibers.

Based on review of the Bulk Sample Analysis Report, asbestos fibers in excess of one percent was not detected in any of the homogeneous materials sampled during the course of this ACM survey. Additional details regarding the ACM Survey conducted by UES are presented in the attached report.

UES appreciates this opportunity to provide environmental services to you and we look forward to future endeavors. If you have any comments or questions regarding the information contained within this report or if we can be of further service, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted, UES Professional Solutions LLC.

Written by, Reviewed by, Brandon M. Selph Jonathan A. Bulley Senior Project Manager Florida Licensed Asbestos Consultant EPA Accredited Asbestos Inspector Florida License No. AX133 i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Limitations and Exclusions

1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work

2.0 Building Characteristics and Information

2.1 General

2.2 Available Building Information

2.3 Current Building Use

3.0 Building Inspection

3.1 Inspection Procedures

3.2 Suspected Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

4.1 Polarized Light Microscopy

4.2 Point Count Analysis

5.0 Findings

6.0 Summary of Asbestos-Containing Materials

7.0 Regulatory information

8.0 Controlling Agency

9.0 CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS SURVEY

ii

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

Bulk Sample Location Map ............................................................................................................... A

APPENDIX B

PLM Analytical Report & Chain-of-Custody Documentation ........................................................... B

APPENDIX C

Inspector(s) Certification ................................................................................................................. C

Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey UES Project No. A25146.01532.0000 5041 Fredrick Avenue UES Report No.2155302 West Melbourne, Brevard County, Florida 32904 August 12, 2025

1.0 INTRODUCTION

UES Professional Solutions (UES) conducted a pre-demolition Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)

Survey on the subject buildings located at 5041 Fredrick Avenue in West Melbourne, Brevard County, Florida 32904. The purpose of this survey was to identify and sample accessible suspect ACM and provide information regarding the identity, location, and condition in anticipation of a renovation and/or demolition of the buildings.

This service was conducted based on the written authorization of Brevard County Public Works, dated July

23, 2025. This service was conducted according to proposal 2154387 dated July 23, 2025. This survey was conducted in accordance with the General Conditions, which are incorporated into the Client authorized agreement that governs this assessment.

This survey was conducted in accordance with Chapter 61-145 of the Environmental Protection Agency’s

(EPA) Title 40, Part 61, Subpart M of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

1.1 Limitations and Exclusions

This survey report is not intended to be used as a specification or work plan. The indicated material quantities of ACM (if documented) are estimates based on UES’ field observations on the date(s) of the inspection(s), and should be considered preliminary in nature. All parties utilizing this report for proposal, estimation or contract negotiations are required to field verify the quantities of material prior to submission of proposal. These estimates should not be used for bidding purposes without verification by the asbestos abatement contractor. The asbestos abatement contractor should ascertain for themselves, by site measurements and inspection, the exact nature and extent of the work to be done.

Inspection and collection of bulk samples of suspect ACMs were limited to those materials readily accessible at the time of inspection. Destructive sampling techniques (such as wall and ceiling testing, and carpet cuts to expose underlying flooring) were employed in limited measures in the areas inspected, and completed in a way to minimize disruption to operations and damage to building components. Extensive destructive sampling methods were not used, and exploratory demolition of walls and/or removal of fixed items were not conducted. No attempt was made by UES to observe conditions in spaces not generally accessible, including but not limited to crawlspaces, pipe chases, plenums or confined spaces. Some materials may be hidden or masked by overlying materials such as flooring, carpeting or concealed walls.

Although every effort is made to locate all suspect ACMs, it is impossible to rule out the possibility that undiscovered asbestos materials may be present. If the building is to undergo major refurbishment or demolition, it is recommended that the persons carrying out the work are made aware of this and take sufficient precautions, as may be appropriate, to ensure the health and safety of their own employees and any other parties who may be affected by the works. Any suspected building materials not addressed in this report, which are encountered during demolition or renovation should be analyzed for asbestos content prior to being damaged and/or removed.

1.2 Purpose and Scope of Work

The purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of the above-referenced facility for the presence of ACMs, specifically those building materials which may be present or impacted during potential demolition or renovation activities. The activities and procedures used to accomplish this task were as follows:

1) A review of available building documents to identify potential locations of suspect ACMs;

2) Visual building inspection of accessible areas by a United States Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accredited asbestos building inspector to identify suspect ACMs;

3) Once identified, homogeneous materials (materials which are uniform in color, texture, construction/application date, and general appearance) were determined;

4) Determine whether the suspect ACM is friable (a material that when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure) or non-friable;

5) Collection of bulk samples of each homogeneous suspect ACM. Record sample information on

Asbestos Bulk Sample Forms (chain-of-custody sheets), which were signed, dated, and sent with the samples to the laboratory;

6) Analysis of the collected bulk samples at a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP) accredited laboratory using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for the presence of asbestos fibers;

7) If applicable, confirmatory analysis of bulk samples documented by PLM analysis as containing less than one percent (<1%), were further analyzed utilizing the “Quantitation using 400 Point

Count Procedure” for asbestos analysis of bulk material via EPA method 600/R-93/116.

8) Approximate locations of the bulk samples were defined. Computer Assisted Drafting and Design

(CADD) drawings were developed indicating sample locations. In addition, approximate quantities of identified ACM were also determined; and,

9) Prepare and submit a report.

2.0 BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS AND INFORMATION

2.1 General

A summary of the subject buildings characteristics are outlined in the table below. Information on the buildings was obtained by UES through our field inspection, review of available building documents and/or property appraiser records.

Main Building

General

Facility Type Single Family Residence

Construction Date 1964

Building Size 2,164

Number of Stories 1

Structural

Foundation Slab-on-Grade

Wall Support Wood Frame/Concrete Block

Wall Finish Stucco Cut Brick/Wood Siding

Roof Support Wood Trusses

Roof System Type Plywood Decking/ Asphalt shingles/BU-TGMMBRN

Mechanical/

Plumbing

HVAC Type Central Unite

Duct Type Flex and metal

Pipe Insulation None

Interior

Wall Substrates Wood

Wall Finishes Drywall

Floor Substrates Concrete

Floor Finishes Ceramic Tile/Painted Concrete/Vinyl Floor Tile/Carpet

Ceiling Systems Drywall

Ceiling Finishes Textured

Other None

2.2 Available Building Information

Previous asbestos survey report, was not provided in reference to the structure located within the subject property.

2.3 Current Building Use

At the time of UES’ evaluation, the subject building was not occupied.

3.0 BUILDING INSPECTION

Three forms of ACMs are typically found in buildings. These materials are classified as follows:

• Surfacing Material – material that is sprayed, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to interior and exterior structural and architectural surfaces. Surfacing material includes acoustical plaster on ceilings, fireproofing on structural members, textured paint and exterior stucco, and other materials applied to surfaces for acoustical, decorative, fireproofing, and other purposes.

• Thermal System Insulation — material which is applied to interior and exterior mechanical components to reduce heat gain or loss. Thermal system insulation includes insulation on pipes, fittings, boilers, breeching, tanks, ducts, and other mechanical components.

• Miscellaneous Materials — material, other than surfacing material and thermal system insulation, on interior and exterior structural, mechanical, electrical, or architectural components, and surfaces. Miscellaneous material includes but is not limited to ceiling tiles, gaskets, floor coverings and mastics, wallboard joint compound, roofing materials, and cementitious products.

An inspection of the subject buildings was conducted to identify these, and other materials present within the buildings which are typically suspected of containing asbestos.

3.1 Inspection Procedures

UES’ field inspection was performed July 31, 2025, by Brandon Selph, an inspector accredited according to Federal Regulation 40 CFR, Part 763 (AHERA), under the direction of an Asbestos Consultant licensed in the State of Florida. After a preliminary walk-through of the building, an inspection was conducted to evaluate the location and extent of the suspected asbestos containing building materials. Once identified, these materials were categorized into homogeneous areas containing materials of the same type, age, visual appearance, texture, composition, etc.

This type of survey is designed to be used as a basis for tendering the removal of ACMs from the subject building (s) prior to demolition or renovation. Therefore, the survey does not assess the condition of the asbestos, other than to note areas of damage or where additional asbestos debris may be expected to be present. The present condition of each ACM was evaluated by UES and classified as one of three categories: Good, Fair or Poor. The “fair” and “poor” categories correspond to the AHERA definitions of

“damaged” and “significantly damaged,” respectively.

The number of bulk samples collected was based on the category of homogeneous material and the quantity of the material present, as follows:

AHERA Guidelines for Determining the Number of Samples to Collect

HSA Category HSA Quantity Samples Required

Surfacing Materials

<1,000 Square Feet 3

1,000 – 5,000 Square Feet 5

>5,000 Square Feet 7 or more

Thermal System Insulation

No Stipulation 3+ (All repair patches must be sampled)

Miscellaneous Materials

No Stipulation

Per AHERA Guidelines, these materials must be sampled “in a manner sufficient to determine whether or not they contain asbestos” typically 1 – 3 samples based upon the inspector’s judgement.

HSA: Homogeneous Sampling Area (materials which are uniform in color, texture, construction/application date, and general appearance)

UES’ inspector(s) employed wet methods as applicable during bulk sample collection to reduce the potential for fiber release. Each sample was documented by labeling the container with a unique sample number, entering the sample material on a bulk sample log or chain-of-custody form, and noting the location of each sample on a floor plan. Throughout the sampling process, care was taken to prevent cross-contamination of the collected bulk samples. Sampling equipment was cleaned following the collection of each sample.

Random, and in some cases judgmental, samples of each homogeneous area of material were then collected. The physical condition of each material was assessed. In addition, a tactile inspection of the material was performed to evaluate friability. If the material, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, it is considered friable. Samples from any homogeneous area where the inspector determine that the material was non-ACM (such as thermal insulation that obviously fibrous glass, foam glass, or rubber) were not collected. Certification for the inspector performing the building survey is presented in Appendix C.

3.2 Suspected Asbestos-Containing Building Materials

Based on UES’ review of the available building system information and thorough visual survey of the subject buildings, nine (09) homogeneous materials were identified at the subject building commonly suspected of containing asbestos. Refer to Table 1 in section 5.0 Findings for a list of the homogeneous materials. A map illustrating the sample locations is included as Appendix A of this report.

4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS

4.1 Polarized Light Microscopy

The samples of the suspected ACMs collected during the field inspection were transported with chain-of-custody documentation to EMSL Analytical, Inc. located in Orlando, Florida. EMSL Analytical is an accredited laboratory for bulk sample analysis according to the National Voluntary Laboratory

Accreditation Program (NVLAP) (Accreditation No. NVLAP 101151-0).

Bulk samples were analyzed for the presence of asbestos fibers using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

The analyses were performed according to EPA Method 600/R-93/116 July 1993 “Method for the

Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials.” This analytical method can be used for qualitative identification of six morphologically different types of asbestos fibers: chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite and anthophylite. PLM analysis requires the microscopist to take a portion of the sample and treat it with an oil of specific refractive index. The prepared slide is then subjected to a variety of tests while being viewed under varying polarizations of light. Each type of asbestos displays unique characteristics when subjected to these tests.

The method specifies that the asbestos content in a bulk sample shall be estimated and reported as a finite percentage within the range of 0 to 100. Minute quantities of asbestos in bulk samples may be reported as “trace” or less than one percent (<1%). The analytical method determines the asbestos percentage by means of visual estimation technique. If analysis of the sample of a suspect ACM reveals a negative result, UES considers the material to be non-asbestos-containing. If at any time during the analytical process a sample tests positive, that material must be treated as asbestos-containing.

4.2 Point Count Analysis

Samples 11, 12, 13 and 14 of the suspect ACMs collected during the field inspection were point counted as part of this survey.

5.0 FINDINGS

Nine (09) suspect homogeneous materials were identified at the subject building. Following AHERA guidelines, the appropriate number of bulk samples were collected from the identified homogeneous material and submitted for laboratory analysis. The laboratory analyses indicated that asbestos fibers were not detected in excess of one percent in any of the homogeneous materials analyzed from the building. "The laboratory analyses by PLM and confirmed by Point Count Method indicated asbestos fibers less than one percent were detected in two homogeneous materials".

Table 1 presents the analytical results of the suspect asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and general information regarding the suspect ACMs.

TABLE 1

Sample Number

HSA Material Material Location Condition Asbestos Analytical

Results

NESHAPS

Category

Estimated Quantity

1, 2 A Tan Stucco Exterior Walls Good None Detected N/A N/A

3, 4 B Tan Brick Stucco Exterior South Wall Good None Detected N/A N/A

5, 6 C Gray Caulking Exterior Windows Good None Detected N/A N/A

7, 8 D Black and Blue

Asphalt Shingles, Tarpaper

Exterior Roofing Good None Detected N/A N/A

9, 10 E Concrete Building Footprint Good None Detected N/A 1,600

11, 12 F Textured Ceiling Interior Ceilings Good

None Detected in the Drywall

<1% Chrysotile in the Texture

N/A N/A

Sample Number

HSA Material Material Location Condition Asbestos Analytical

Results

NESHAPS

Category

Estimated Quantity

13, 14 G Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape Interior Walls Good

<1% Chrysotile in the Joint

Compound None Detected in the Drywall and

Tape.

N/A N/A

15, 16 H Gray Mastic AC Duct work Good None Detected N/A N/A

17, 18 I 12”x12” Vinyl Floor

Tile, Mastic Hallway Bathroom Good None Detected N/A N/A

Table Notes and Definitions:

HSA: Homogeneous Sampling Area (materials which are uniform in color, texture, construction/application date, and general appearance) NESHAPS = National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants N/A = Not Applicable SF = Square Feet LF = Linear Feet EA = Each TBD = To Be Determined *Note* - The indicated material quantities are estimates based on UES’ field observations and should be considered preliminary in nature.

These estimates should not be used for bidding purposes without verification by the asbestos abatement contractor.

6.0 SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

Inspection of the subject building, located at 5041 Fredrick Avenue in West Melbourne, Brevard County, Florida 32904, identified nine (09) materials suspected of containing asbestos fibers. Bulk samples of each material were collected and submitted to an NVLAP accredited laboratory for analysis.

The results indicated that none of the suspect materials contained asbestos fibers in excess of one percent.

The bulk sample laboratory report and associated chain-of-custody documentation are presented in

Appendix C.

7.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION

There are federal and state statutes and regulations which govern the abatement and disposal of ACMs.

The renovation or demolition of buildings and roofs containing ACMs is regulated under the NESHAP statute. The NESHAP regulations require notification to the controlling agency and removal of all regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) prior to renovation or demolition. RACM is defined as

(1) friable asbestos material, (2) Category I non-friable asbestos containing material that has become friable, (3) Category I non-friable asbestos containing material that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or (4) Category II non-friable asbestos containing material that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by

NESHAP. We strongly recommend that you contact the Controlling Agency prior to renovation or demolition regarding the proper disposition of the ACMs. It is important to note that even though an activity may be exempt from the EPA NESHAP regulations; such exemption does not extend to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards or other state and federal statutes.

Renovation or demolition of this structure should be conducted in strict compliance with the aforementioned federal statutes and other applicable regulations, and good health and safety practices.

All procedures, methods and documentation should be accomplished by and be the responsibility of appropriately licensed professionals (asbestos consultants and contractors). Any material identified as non-friable ACM must be treated as friable ACM when the material is about to become friable as a result of activities performed within the building.

There are federal and state statutes and regulations which govern the abatement and disposal of ACMs.

The renovation or demolition of buildings and roofs containing ACMs is regulated under the NESHAP statute. The NESHAP regulations require notification to the controlling agency and removal of all regulated asbestos containing materials (RACM) prior to renovation or demolition. RACM is defined as (1) friable asbestos material, (2) Category I non-friable asbestos containing material that has become friable, (3)

Category I on-friable asbestos containing material that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading, or (4) Category II non-friable asbestos containing material that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations regulated by NESHAP. We strongly recommend that you contact the Controlling Agency prior to renovation or demolition regarding the proper disposition of the ACMs. It is important to note that even though an activity may be exempt from the EPA NESHAP regulations, such exemption does not extend to Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) standards or other state and federal statutes.

Renovation or demolition activities in buildings and on roofs that contain ACM or presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) are regulated under the OSHA Asbestos Construction Standard (29 CFR

1926.1101). The OSHA standard requires the building owner to inform their employees who will work in or adjacent to areas containing ACM or PACM, perspective employers applying or bidding for work whose employees reasonably can be expected to work in or adjacent to areas containing ACM or PACM, all employers of employees on multi-employer work sites who will be performing work with or adjacent to areas containing asbestos and tenants who will occupy areas containing ACM or PACM, of the presence, location, and quantity of ACM or PACM at the work sites in their building and facilities. Further, the OSHA standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) requires employers who discover ACM or PACM to convey information concerning the presence, location and quantity of such newly discovered ACM or PACM to others employers of employees working at the work site within 24 hours of discovery. While OSHA says the notification can be written or personal communication, there are many advantages to written communication.

The OSHA construction standard (29 CFR 1926.1101) also contains specific training, work practices, procedures, engineering controls, notifications, permissible exposure limits, personal protection, record keeping and a multitude of other requirements for the demolition, renovation, construction, alterations, repair, maintenance of structures, substrates or portions thereof that contain asbestos. It should be noted that recent court rulings have exempted roofing cement from the OSHA Construction Industry Asbestos

Standard.

Renovation or demolition of the structures and roofs that could potentially disturbed the ACM located within the subject property should be conducted in strict compliance with the aforementioned federal statutes and other applicable regulations, and good health and safety practices. All procedures, methods and documentation should be accomplished by and be the responsibility of appropriately licensed professionals (asbestos consultants and contractors). Any material identified as non-friable ACM must be treated as friable ACM when the material is about to become friable as a result of activities performed within the building.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines asbestos containing material (ACM) as any material which contains greater than one percent asbestos. When samples analyzed by Polarized Light

Microscopy contain asbestos in amounts less than ten percent (< 10%), a more exact method of analysis called point counting may be performed at the client’s request. The EPA point count method allows a sample in which asbestos was visually detected, but which is visually estimated to have 10% or less asbestos, to be quantified using a point count procedure. If not point counted, a sample in which asbestos was visually detected and estimated (including trace to ≤1%) must be assumed to be greater than 1% and treated as an ACM. Per EPA’s regulations, materials which have been point-counted and, therefore, quantitatively determined to have less than or equal to one percent (≤1%) asbestos, can be treated as non-ACM.

8.0 CONTROLLING AGENCY

The Controlling Agency for the coordination of projects involving asbestos removal or demolition for

Brevard County is the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Orange County

Environmental Protection Division. The District Air Compliance Contact for asbestos is Mr. John Parker, who can be reached by phone at (407) 836-1400 or by email at John.Parker@ocfl.net.

The owner or operator shall provide the above-referenced department with a ten-day notice of the asbestos removal project or demolition by timely submittal of a completed "Notification of Asbestos

Removal Project" form, as promulgated under Florida Administrative Code. The notification can be submitted on Florida’s Department of Environmental Protection’s Business Portal, located online at https://www.fldepportal.com/DepPortal/go/home.

9.0 CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS SURVEY

A representative of UES obtained samples of building materials which were observed during an inspection of the building at the subject site that are typically suspected of containing asbestos as a constituent. The bulk samples were submitted to an NVLAP approved laboratory for analysis using EPA approved methods for industry-accepted standards. No other warranty is expressed or implied.

mailto:John.Parker@ocfl.net https://www.fldepportal.com/DepPortal/go/home

In general, non-destructive inspection and sampling procedures were incorporated which allowed assessment of reasonably accessible building materials. This survey did not include a significantly destructive search behind walls or below existing floors. Some materials may be hidden or masked by overlying materials such as flooring, carpeting or concealed walls. While a reasonable effort was made by UES to collect and analyze samples of suspect materials, some may remain unobserved by the inspector.

Any suspected building materials not addressed in this report, which are encountered during demolition or renovation should be analyzed for asbestos content prior to being damaged and/or removed. The building’s equipment fixtures or stored materials were not inspected or sampled as part of this evaluation.

Analysis of resinously bound materials by EPA Method 600/R-93/116 July 1993, may yield false-negative results because of method limitations in separating closely bound fibers and in detecting fibers of small length and diameter. Should you desire, other analytical methods including Transmission Electron

Microscopy can be used to further evaluate these types of materials.

This survey report is not intended to be used as an asbestos abatement specification or work plan. The indicated material quantities of ACM (if documented) are estimates based on UES’ field observations on the date(s) of the inspection, and should be considered preliminary in nature. All parties utilizing this report for proposal, estimation or contract negotiations are required to field verify the quantities of material prior to submission of proposal. These estimates should not be used for bidding purposes without verification by the asbestos abatement contractor. The asbestos abatement contractor should ascertain for themselves, by site measurements and inspection, the exact nature and extent of the work to be done.

APPENDIX A

ASBESTOS SURVEY

5041 FREDERICK AVENUE

WEST MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

BMS 8/8/2025 BMS 8/8/2025

Not To Scale A25146.01532.000 2155302 1

DRAWN BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE

SCALE PROJECT NO. REPORT NO. FIGURE NO.

SAMPLE LOCATION PLAN

SOURCE: Brevard County Property Appraiser

APPENDIX B

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT Orlando, FL 32808

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

342516046EMSL Order:

Customer ID: UESO50

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Brandon Selph (321) 638-0808

Fax:Universal Engineering Sciences (321) 638-0978

Received Date:820 Brevard Avenue 08/01/2025 11:02 AM

Analysis Date:Rockledge, FL 32955 08/05/2025 - 08/06/2025

Collected Date: 07/31/2025

Project: A25146-01532.000 Brevard County Public Works 5041 Frederick Avenue

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

342516046-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Walls West -

Tan Stucco

342516046-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Walls South -

Tan Stucco

342516046-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Walls East -

Tan Brick Stucco

342516046-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Tan/Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Walls East -

Tan Brick Stucco

342516046-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Windows -

Gray Caulking

342516046-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Windows -

Gray Caulking

7-Shingle

342516046-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Glass15%Black/Blue

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof NE - Black, Blue

Asphalt Shingles, Tar

Paper

No Tar Paper Present

7-Felt

342516046-0007A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Glass15%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof NE - Black, Blue

Asphalt Shingles, Tar

Paper

8-Shingle

342516046-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%Black/Blue

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof S - Black, Blue

Asphalt Shingles, Tar

Paper

No tar paper present in sample.

8-Mastic

342516046-0008A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Roof S - Black, Blue

Asphalt Shingles, Tar

Paper

342516046-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building Foot Print -

Concrete Slab

342516046-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan/White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Building Foot Print -

Concrete Slab

11-Drywall

342516046-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

11-Texture

342516046-0011A

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

12-Drywall

342516046-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

Initial report from: 08/06/2025 10:21:57

Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0002 - 2.31 Printed: 8/6/2025 10:21 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

342516046EMSL Order:

Customer ID: UESO50

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

12-Texture

342516046-0012A

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

13-Drywall

342516046-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

13-Joint Compound 1

342516046-0013A

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

13-Joint Compound 2

342516046-0013B

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

13-Tape

342516046-0013C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)2%Cellulose98%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

14-Drywall

342516046-0014

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose10%Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

14-Joint Compound

342516046-0014A

<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

14-Tape

342516046-0014B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls -

Drywall, Joint

Compound, Tape

342516046-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

AC Duct Work - Gray

Mastic

342516046-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

AC Duct Work - Gray

Mastic

17-Flooring 1

342516046-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

17-Adhesive

342516046-0017A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

17-Flooring 2

342516046-0017B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

17-Adhesive

342516046-0017C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

18-Flooring 1

342516046-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

18-Adhesive

342516046-0018A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

18-Flooring 2

342516046-0018B

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

18-Adhesive 2

342516046-0018C

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown/Clear

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Hallway Bathroom

Flooring - 12x12 Tan

& White VCT

Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0002 - 2.31 Printed: 8/6/2025 10:21 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

342516046EMSL Order:

Customer ID: UESO50

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Analyst(s)

Alexia Dubocq (9)

Eriq Wilson (7)

Jason Stuhr (17)

Laura Vera, Asbestos Supervisor or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . The report reflects the samples as received.

Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 “Interim Method”) but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 (”final”) version of the method. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non- friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis . Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0

Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0002 - 2.31 Printed: 8/6/2025 10:21 AM

OrderID: 342516046

OrderID: 342516046

Phone/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

EMSL Order: 342516046

Customer ID: UESO50

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Brandon Selph Phone: (321) 638-0808

Universal Engineering Sciences Fax: (321) 638-0978

820 Brevard Avenue Received: 08/01/2025 11:02 AM

Rockledge, FL 32955 Analysis Date: 08/07/2025

Collected: 07/31/2025

Project: A25146-01532.000 Brevard County Public Works 5041 Frederick Avenue

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via AHERA Method 40CFR 763 Subpart E

Appendix E supplemented with EPA 600/R-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy.

Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous % Type

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

11-Texture

342516046-0011A

Non-fibrous (Other)99.75% 0.25%Chrysotile

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Ceilings -

Textured Ceiling, Drywall

12-Texture

342516046-0012A

Non-fibrous (Other)99.25% 0.75%Chrysotile

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls - Drywall, Joint Compound, Tape

13-Joint Compound

342516046-0013A

Non-fibrous (Other)100.0% <0.25%Chrysotile

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls - Drywall, Joint Compound, Tape

13-Joint Compound

342516046-0013B

Non-fibrous (Other)100.0% <0.25%Chrysotile

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Interior Walls - Drywall, Joint Compound, Tape

14-Joint Compound

342516046-0014A

Non-fibrous (Other)100.0% <0.25%Chrysotile

Analyst(s)

Rain Wynia (5) Laura Vera, Asbestos Supervisor or other approved signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. The report reflects the samples as received. Results are generated from the field sampling data (sampling volumes and areas, locations, etc.) provided by the client on the Chain of Custody. Samples are within quality control criteria and met method specifications unless otherwise noted. The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA

600/M4-82-020 “Interim Method”) but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 (”final”) version of the method. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Unless requested by the client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.

Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0

Initial report from: 08/08/2025 15:13:55

ASB_PLMPC_0006_0003 Printed 8/8/2025 3:13:57PM Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX C

Melanie S. Griffin, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT

THE ASBESTOS CONSULTANT HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES

BULLEY, JONATHAN A

Do not alter this document in any form.

INDIVIDUAL

LICENSE NUMBER: AX133

EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2026

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

13381 SW 42ND STREET

MIRAMAR FL 33027

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com

ISSUED: 09/20/2024

https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=1780a97ece47e3d3a888f705141e2869 https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=1780a97ece47e3d3a888f705141e2869

Rcertifies

Brandon Selph 820 Brevard Ave, Rockledge, Fl, 32907

Having passed a 25-question exam with a score of 70% or higher has successfully met training requirements for

Asbestos Refresher: Inspector Online FDBPR Asbestos Licensing Unit: Provider #0000995; Course #FL49-0006389 (½ Day; 3.40 Contact Hours)

(Reaccreditation for Inspector under TSCA Title II/AHERA)

Conducted

6/23/2025

Certificate #: 0091 - 004-41176

Exam Date: 6/23/2025

EPA accreditation expires: 6/23/2026

Principal Instructor: Brian Duchene, PE, LAC

CEUs: 0.4

FBPR LAC: #0000995; Course ## 0006389

FBPE CEHs: #0004021; Course #0009083/Educational Institutions: 4 CEHs