Attachment A14.docx

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology

Past Performance (RFP/ITB Attachment A-14)

Return this form in a Microsoft Word compatible format Introduction

1. This Attachment sets forth the requirements to be followed in preparing information on your Past Performance. The information provided will be used to help determine responsibility and must be provided in writing by the date indicated in the RFP.

· Please provide the Past Performance Volume of your proposal in the same number of copies as your Cost Proposal, unless otherwise indicated by JPL in the RFP Cover Letter.

· If the Technical/Management part of your proposal is to be presented via an Oral Presentation, then the written Past Performance Volume of your proposal is due by the date indicated on the RFP Title Sheet.

· JPL may contact and verify the references you provide in your proposal to assess Past Performance.

Requirement

4. JPL will forward the following to your customer to evaluate past performance:

Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Date:

Customer’s Name

Address

RFP Title:

The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is currently evaluating a proposal submitted by Reference (b) Proposer to the Reference (a) JPL RFP. Under the Past Performance section of the proposal, the Proposer submitted the information below to help JPL evaluate past performance. Please verify that the information provided in Preliminary Information table is correct and complete the Contractor Performance Information table on page 2

Preliminary Information

Customer Name/Address:

Contract No.:

Contract Type:

Description of Effort:

Period of Performance:

Task or Support Type:

Average No. of Personnel Assigned to Effort:

Initial Cost/Price:

Current/Final Cost/Price:

Overrun (if any, explain):

Your customer’s contact information

· Telephone Nos.:

· Emails:

· Titles:

Contractor Performance Information

Use the Definitions of Ratings table appended at the end of this form to indicate a rating for each of the performance areas below.

Contractor Performance Ratings

E = Exceptional; VG = Very Good; S = Satisfactory M = Marginal; U = Unsatisfactory

Technical

Schedule

Cost

(If costs overran, describe the degree to which it was the contractor’s responsibility.)

Management of contract

Management of Any Lower-Tier Subcontracts

Commitment to Contract/ Program

Responsive-ness to Requirement Changes

If you were to consider this contractor for another effort, what area(s) would you probe further?

Please send your response by email to the undersigned.

Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this request.

Sincerely, Subcontracts Manager Phone: (818) Email:

Request for Proposal (RFP) Past Performance Adjective Rating Method

Definition of Ratings

* Customer = Organization that awarded the contract.

This document has been reviewed and determined not to contain export controlled technical data.

JPL 0358-A14 Rev 9/22 image1.png