Attachment 9 Appendix D Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 205 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Moyer Bridge Installation - Salmon-Challis National Forest Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1282B123R0077
- Issued by
- Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for solicitation number 1282B123R0077, issued by the Department of Agriculture Forest Service. The solicitation is for an aquatic organism passage project to replace an existing ford with a bridge, conduct channel restoration, install a government-furnished bridge on contractor-provided abutments, and construct bridge approach roadways. The project is located on the Salmon-Challis National Forest in Lemhi County, Idaho. The questionnaire asks the respondent to evaluate a contractor's past performance on similar projects, including adherence to workmanship standards, timeliness, business relations, and responsiveness to technical direction. Responses are due by 1:00PM Central Time on August 30, 2023 and must be emailed to the contracting officer.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 10 Moyer Creek Bridge Shop Drawings APPROVED.pdf | ||
| 1282B123R0077.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 G-074 MOYER CREEK FINAL Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attachment 7 MOYER MATERIALS VICINITY MAP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Project Design Features.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 PRELIM MOYER CREEK FSSS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Statement of Work.pdf | ||
| Q_As Moyer Site Visit_6.28.23_sk.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 DBWage Determination ID20220087_5.12.23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 MOYER ACCESS MAP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Schedule of Items.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 For Official Use Only
APPENDIX D
Past Performance Questionnaire should be returned Directly to the Contracting Officer, no later than
1:00PM Central Time, August 30, 2023. Questionnaires must be received by email. Email address is susan.j.kunath@usda.gov Please specify in the subject line 1282B123R0077.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Person completing questionnaire:
Phone number/email address:
Firm’s name:
NOTE: Information obtained may be shared with Contractor if requested, but the name of person providing information will be kept confidential.
Contractor: Project: Moyer Bridge Replacement
This requirement is for an Aquatic Organism Passage project to replace an existing ford with a bridge; channel restoration, installation of a government furnished bridge on contractor provided abutments and the construction of bridge approach roadways. The contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, supervision, transportation, supplies, and incidentals (except Government-provided sources) to accomplish this task. All work shall be in accordance with the supplied drawings, specifications and bid schedule. The project is located on the Salmon-Challis National Forest, County of Lemhi, Idaho, 47.8 miles from Salmon, Idaho and 48.3 miles from Challis, Idaho.
1. Has this contractor performed any of these services for you? If yes, which ones?
2. Did the contractor adhere to good standards of workmanship? Do you have specific examples of this?
3. Overall, to what extent were you satisfied with the contractor’s completed services?
_ _ Extremely satisfied _ _ Generally satisfied
_ _ Generally dissatisfied _ _ Extremely dissatisfied
4. Timeliness of performance:
a. Did the contractor comply with contract performance schedules? If no, were there
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 For Official Use Only mitigating circumstances?
b. Were they reliable?
c. Were they responsive to technical direction?
d. Any liquidated damages assessed?
5. Business relations:
e. Does the contractor have effective management? Please explain:
f. Does the contractor have a good working relationship with the Contracting
Officer/technical representatives? Please explain:
g. Are they reasonable, cooperative, and flexible?
h. Did they present effective recommendations for solutions to problems? Please explain:
i. Did they show a businesslike concern for the Government’s (or landowner if the project was with a private firm) interests? Please provide examples.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .