Attachment 9 - 4320-013P_Adams.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Northeast Regional Construction IDIQ (MATOC)
- Solicitation number
- 693C73
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
ADAMS CREEK BRIDGE
U.S. ROUTE 209 OVER ADAMS CREEK
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
LOOKING NORTH
STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 11/6/2019
EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
ADAMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/06/2019
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ..... 1 - CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: .............. 04 - TEE BEAM NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: . 6 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 28.0 FT (8.5 M)
DECK TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 24 FT (7.3 M)
WEARING SURFACE: ......... 6 - BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ..................... 26.3 FT (8 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ....... CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 23.3 FT (7.1 M)
PIER FOUDNATION(S): ...... 6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: .. 1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ....... 14(4) SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ..... 2000-BEAMS, ABUT. & PIERS PATCHED; RIPRAP ADDED AT ABUT. 2009- NEW
DOWNSPOUTS; ABUT. AND EXT. BM. PATCHED; RIPRAP & CONCR. APRON PLACED
AT S. ABUT. FTG.
LOCATION
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
STATE: .............................. 423 - PENNSYLVANIA
FACILITY CARRIED: ......... U.S. ROUTE 209
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ADAMS CREEK
MILE POINT: .. 14.60 (KM PT 4.45)
LOCATION: .... 1.2 MILES NORTH OF ROUTE 739.
INSPECTION TEAM: G. Goodlin, W. Marte
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Gary Goodlin
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 04/08/2020
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete tee beam bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is deterioration (including cracking and spalling) of previously patched areas on exterior beams and abutments. Beam #1 (east exterior beam) exhibit longitudinal cracks extending for nearly the full length of the span, with rust staining bleeding through, and Beam #6 (west exterior beam) has spalled off with exposed rebar.
Other problems include moderate to severe sloughing of the channel bank behind the southeast wingwall; and moderate scour and undermining along the south abutment, extending up to 2' back under the apron and footing at the south abutment in places. In addition, there is a drop off (up to 3") in the northbound lane of the south approach and the southbound lane of the north approach, and all of the deck drains are fully clogged.
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
It should also be noted that this bridge is functionally obsolete due to its narrow width, should be signed with "NARROW BRIDGE" warning signs to enhance motorist safety.
This bridge is currently scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project DEWA 14(18),121(1). The scope of work includes concrete repairs to the beams and the abutments; and grouting under the south abutment, followed by installation of riprap.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
ADAMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 11/06/2019
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recomendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
222.7
INSTALL "NARROW BRIDGE" SIGNS AT BOTH
APPROACHES. 4 EA 250 1000
58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK DRAINS AND ALONG
CURBS. 1 LS 1000 1000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
60.9,60.
11,61.3
FILL UNDERMINED AREAS OF ABUTMENTS
WITH GROUT AND PLACE SCOUR
COUNTERMEASURES ALONG SOUTH
ABUTMENT AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
1 LS 20000 20000
58.3,222.
4,222.6
PATCH ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE ALONG
BOTH SHOULDERS, ALONG CENTERLINE, AND
IN SOUTH APPROACH.
1 LS 5000 5000
59.2 REPAIR DETERIORATED AREAS OF CONCRETE
ALONG EXTERIOR BEAMS. 1 LS 30000 30000
222.3 RECONNECT BREAKAWAY GUARDRAIL POST
AT SOUTHEAST TERMINAL END TO
GUARDRAIL.
1 LS 2000 2000
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS 50000 50000
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 107000
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
ADAMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 11/06/2019
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0
109000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G
G
N
F
P
G
N
N
F
N
N
N
G
N
N
G
G
N
F
F
F
F
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
N
N
F
F
G
G
F
N
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS N
3. WEARING SURFACE F
N 12 FT
F
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
ROCK
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS N
5. FOUNDATIONS G
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES N
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION F
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 MINOR MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE; MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT ALL FOUR
CORNERS.
58.3
222.4
222.6
ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE. SETTLEMENT WITH SHOULDER DROP OFF, UP TO 3", FOR ABOUT 20' LENGTH AT NORTHBOUND
LANE AT SOUTH APPROACH AND SOUTHBOUND LANE AT NORTH APPROACH.
POTHOLE IN ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE IN NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR SOUTH END AND SEVERAL POTHOLE ALONG
CENTERLINE AT NORTH APPROACH.
58.6 WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING OF RAILINGS; MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING. MINOR DIAGONAL THROUGH
CRACKING AT ENDS OF WEST RAIL; MINOR DELAMINATION AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST RAIL NEAR SOUTH END.
58.7 GALVANIZED STEEL DOWNSPOUTS EXTEND BELOW BOTTOM OF BEAMS; ALL FOUR DECK DRAINS ARE FULLY CLOGGED WITH
DEBRIS.
MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS WITH VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES.
59.2 SPALLS WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON EXTERIOR BEAMS HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN PATCHED; PATCHES ARE BEGINNING TO CRACK WITH RUST STAINS BLEEDING THROUGH IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS, PATCH ON BEAM #6 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM) HAS SPALLED
OFF WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE.
MINOR EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH FACES OF BEAM #3 AND EAST FACE OF BEAM #5.
60.1
60.3
MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING THROUGHOUT ABUTMENTS. PATCH AT WEST CORNER OF NORTH BREASTWALL BEGINNING TO
CRACK WITH MINOR EFFLORESCENCE.
PATCHED VERTICAL CRACK AT EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ABUTMENT IS DELAMINATED AND BEGINNING TO CRACK AGAIN. MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE FROM BEARING SEAT AREAS.
60.5
60.11
61.3
CONCRETE APRON (6" WIDE) HAS BEEN PLACED AT FRONT OF SOUTH ABUTMENT FOOTING AND A CONCRETE APRON EXISTS IN FRONT OF NORTH ABUTMENT. SOME RIPRAP HAS BEEN DISPLACED FROM BASE OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. RIPRAP COVERS NORTH ABUTMENT FOOTING, BUT FOOTING IS EXPOSED 2.0' HIGH AT UPSTREAM END TAPERING TO 8" HIGH AT DOWNSTREAM
END.
UP TO 1'-6" UNDERMINING OF CONCRETE APRON NEAR EAST END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT.
60.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE, ESPECIALLY AT TOP OF SOUTH AND NORTHEAST WINGWALLS.
MODERATE HORIZONTAL AND RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
MINOR DORMANT VEGETATION GROWTH ON ALL WINGWALLS.
60.9 MINOR EROSION AT NORTH WINGWALL ENDS. MODERATE SCOUR ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT; FOOTING AND APRON EXPOSED FULL HEIGHT FOR FULL LENGTH AND UNDERMINED UP TO 6" HIGH X UP TO 2' BACK FROM MID-LENGTH TO DOWNSTREAM END
(CORRESPONDS TO BREASTWALL UNDERMINING UP TO 1' BACK).
60.10 MINOR ROTATION OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL, 1" AS MEASURED AT TOP. PREVIOUSLY NOTED ROTATION OF SOUTHEAST
WINGWALL NOT OBSERVED.
61.1 CHANNEL IS SLIGHTLY SKEWED TO STRUCTURE OPENING AND FLOWS AGAINST DOWNSTREAM END OF SOUTH ABUTMENT AND
ALONG SOUTHEAST WINGWALL.
61.2 MODERATE TO SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG CHANNEL BANK BEHIND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL (15' LONG X 10' HIGH X 8' DEEP).
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN TREES IN DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL.
222.3 SHEARED ANCHOR BOLT AT GUARDRAIL CONNECTION TO SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST PARAPETS.
DISCONNECTED BREAKAWAY GUARDRAIL POST AT SOUTHEAST TERMINAL END. COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST
GUARDRAIL.
222.7 "NARROW BRIDGE" SIGNS NOT PRESENT. TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT CORNERS. TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS ALSO AFFIXED TO
ENDS OF APPROACH GUARDRAILS.
222.8 HILL AT SOUTH APPROACH LIMITS SIGHT DISTANCE.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 35 32 59 54
TYPE 3 28 25 46 42
TYPE 3S2 43 39 71 64
TYPE 3-3 54 49 90 82
DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 04/22/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE). HEAVY
ASPHALT OVERLAY HAS REDUCED LIVE LOAD CAPACITY.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............ADAMS CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........4320-013 P
3 - NORTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 14(4)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
423 - PENNSYLVANIA
01103 MORGAN
00000
1 6 1 00014 0
ADAMS CREEK
U.S. ROUTE 209
4320013P0000000
1 2 MILES NORTH OF ROUTE 739.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
14.60 (KM PT: 4.45 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........1 - CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 04 - TEE BEAM (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............24 FT ( 7.3 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 28.0 FT ( 8.5 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 6 - BITUMINOUS
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............26.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOATONS ( 24.3
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............44.8 TONS ( 40.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/06/2019 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://RATING:
https://RATING:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-013P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 41° 14'21.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 23.3 FT ( 7.1 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 74°51 '58 90" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 26.3 FT ( 8 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 4 MI ( 6 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 31.0 FT ( 9.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 23.0 FT ( 7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 4 0 FT ( 1.2 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............5000 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2011 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................6000 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 23.3 FT ( 7.1 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2031 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON W RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 7 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............5 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................5 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 6 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO PROTEC
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 107000
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:.......28.0 FT ( 8 5 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2000-BEAMS, ABUT. & PIERS PATCHED; RIPRAP ADDED AT ABUT. 2009- NEW DOWNSPOUTS; ABUT. AND EXT. BM. PATCHED; RIPRAP & CONCR. APRON
PLACED AT S. ABUT. FTG.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
https://LENGTH:
https://14'21.40
Inspector: Gary Goodlin Structure Number: 4320013P0000000
Inspection Date: 11/06/2019 Facility Carried: U.S. ROUTE 209
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD BUSHKILL
PHOTO 4
Description WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING NORTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description SETTLEMENT OF EDGE OF ROAD, NORTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH APPROACH SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description POTHOLE IN WEARING SURFACE IN NORTHBOUND LANE NEAR SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description SEVERAL POTHOLES IN WEARING SURFACE ALONG CENTERLINE AT NORTH APPROACH
PHOTO 10
Description TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING ON TOP OF WEST RAILING NEAR SOUTH END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING ON TOP OF WEST RAILING NEAR NORTH END
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL CLOGGED DECK DRAIN, WEST EDGE OF ROADWAY NEAR NORTH END SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS AND VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES, ALONG WEST CURB SHOWN
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE OF DECK UNDERSIDE AT ALL
FOUR CORNERS, NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description FULL LENGTH LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH RUST STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BEAM
#1 (EAST EXTERIOR BEAM)
PHOTO 16
Description SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR OF PREVIOUSLY PATCHED AREA ON UNDERSIDE OF
BEAM #6 (WEST EXTERIOR BEAM)
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #5
PHOTO 18
Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description CRACKING AND DELAMINATION OF FINISH COAT ON CONCRETE REPAIR ON NORTH
ABUTMENT AT WEST END
PHOTO 20
Description DELAMINATION OF PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK ON EAST END
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 22
Description SCOUR AND UNDERMINING OF SOUTH ABUTMENT AT DOWNSTREAM END
PHOTO 23
Description EROSION BEHIND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE EROSION OF SHALLOW BANKS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 24
Description DISCONNECTED RAIL POST AT BREAKAWAY RAILING AT SOUTH END OF EAST RAILING
PHOTO 25
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 26
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .