Attachment 8 - 4320-009P_Bushkill.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Northeast Regional Construction IDIQ (MATOC)
- Solicitation number
- 693C73
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BUSH KILL CREEK BRIDGE
U.S. ROUTE 209 OVER BUSH KILL CREEK
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
LOOKING NORTH
STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 11/5/2019
WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
BUSH KILL CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/05/2019
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:
MAIN SPAN TYPE:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .
DECK TYPE:
WEARING SURFACE:
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:
PIER FOUDNATION(S):
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
STRUCTURE HISTORY:
3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
10 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 189.7 FT (57.8 M)
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 63.3 FT (19.3 M)
3 - LATEX CONCRETE OR SIMILAR DECK WIDTH: ..................... 45.0 FT (13.7 M)
CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 42.8 FT (13 M)
0 - UNKNOWN YEAR BUILT:
1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .
14(1,2),12(2) SKEW ANGLE: .................... 15 °
1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N
1994-New deck & railings; Riprap placed along substruct units. 2009-New overlay; New joints over piers; New elastomeric bearings; Abut. and piers patched; Superstructure painted.
LOCATION
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: .. 1.40 (KM PT 0.43)
STATE: .............................. 423 - PENNSYLVANIA LOCATION: .... 1.4 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH PARK
BOUNDARY, JUST SOUTH OFFACILITY CARRIED: ......... U.S. ROUTE 209
BUSHKILL.
FEATURE INTERSECTED: BUSH KILL CREEK
INSPECTION TEAM: G. Goodlin, W. Marte
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
Gary Goodlin
REPORT REVIEW:
Marcus Miller
REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 04/08/2020
Jorgomai Ceesay
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This steel multi-beam bridge is in fair to good condition overall. Problems include several areas of paint failure on the steel beams; minor to moderate cracking and delamination of the latex modified concrete overlay on the deck, and on the approach slabs adjacent to the joints over the abutments; gravel and soil accumulation in the deck joints and along the curblines; and flood debris lodged against the structure, causing constriction of the channel opening.
It should be noted that the steel diaphragm/bracing angles have been field welded to the beam webs, and that many of these locations have cracked or completely broken. No cracks appear to have propagated into the base metal, and the bridge does not exhibit any distress as a consequent of the damaged angles.
The channel flows against the north abutment and northeast retaining wall, causing moderate scour. The
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
retaining wall is significantly undermined; as noted in the previous inspection report, approximately 50' of the retaining wall has collapsed at the downstream end.
It should be noted that this bridge is scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project DEWA 14 (18),121(1). The scope of work includes concrete repairs to the deck surface and pier nosing; spot painting of the structural steel; cleaning and resealing the deck joints; safety rail installation; and riprap placement.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
BUSH KILL CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 11/05/2019
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT C
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
Item No.
Maintenance Recomendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
58.2,58.7
REMOVE DEBRIS FROM DECK JOINTS AND CURBLINES.
1 LS 2000 2000
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 2000
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
223.1 REPLACE FAILED SECTION OF NORTHEAST
RETAINING WALL. 1 LS 150000 150000
59.6 REMOVE DIAPHRAGM ANGLES FIELD WELDED
TO BEAM WEBS, GRIND WEBS SMOOTH, AND
PROVIDE BOLTED ATTACHMENT FOR
DIAPHRAGMS.
1 LS 100000 100000
60.17, PLACE SCOUR COUNTER MEASURE ALONG
223.4 NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL, SOUTH SIDE
AND DOWNSTREAM ENDS OF PIERS TO
ARREST SCOUR.
1 LS 50000 50000
223.1, 223.4
REPAIR UNDERMINING AT NORTHEAST
RETAINING WALLS WITH GROUT; REPLACE
MISSING STONES.
1 LS 50000 50000
223.3 REPAIR/REPLACE COLLISION DAMAGE TO
NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
GUARDRAILS.
1 LS 15000 15000
59.2 CLEAN AND SPOT PAINT BEAMS AS
NECESSARY. 1 LS 15000 15000
60.15,61.
REMOVE FLOOD DEBRIS LODGED AT
UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOTH PIERS AND FROM
NORTH AND CENTER SPANS.
1 LS 15000 15000
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
BUSH KILL CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 11/05/2019
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
58.3,222.
PATCH WEARING SURFACE IN WEST
SHOULDER, IN SOUTHBOUND LANE ADJACENT
TO JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT, AND IN
SOUTHBOUND LANE IN CENTER SPAN.
1 LS 20000 20000
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.
1 LS 400000 400000
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 815000
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
815000
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
817000
817000
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Bridge is scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project DEWA 14(18),121(1).
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
58. DECK
1. DECK SLAB
4. RIDEABILITY
5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
8. UTILITIES
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.OTHER:
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
1. BEARING DEVICES
2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
5. TRUSSES
6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
7. PAINT
8. FASCIA(E)
9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
10.ALIGNMENT
11.OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
61. CHANNEL
1. ALIGNMENT
2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
5. OTHER
6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:
222. APPROACHES
1. APPROACH SLABS
2. RELIEF JOINTS
3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL
4. SURFACING
5. EROSION
6. SETTLEMENT
7. SIGNS
8. ALIGNMENT
9. OTHER
223. RETAINING WALL
1. WALL
2. WEEP HOLES
3. FOUNDATION
4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
6. OTHER
G
G
G
G
F
G
N
G
F
N
N
N
P
F
N
G
G
N
F
G
G
F
N
1- SUFF
2 - MED
F
N
G
G
G
G
G
N
P
N
N
P
G
G
N
2. EXPANSION JOINTS F
3. WEARING SURFACE F
N 11 FT
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLEN
EXCELLENT CONDITION9
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6
FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.
Structure is closed to
FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0
ROCK, SILT
ABUTMENTS
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS N
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11.SLOPE PROTECTION N
12.OTHER N
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:
B. TRANSITIONS:
C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:
D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:
PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
14.PILE BENTS
15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
16.FOUNDATIONS
17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
19.OTHER ARMORING
G
N
G
N
F
G
G
0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is required and none is provided.
1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.
N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
58.1 TRANSVERSE AND MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT DECK UNDERSIDE.
58.2 STRIP SEAL JOINTS OVER PIERS FILLED WITH SOIL AND WATER. MINOR TO MODERATE GRAVEL AND DEBRIS IN JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS, PRIMARILY IN SHOULDERS. MODERATE ADHESION FAILURE THROUGHOUT JOINT SEALANT OVER SOUTH
ABUTMENT WITH SEALANT MISSING IN SOME AREAS.
58.3
222.1
MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF LATEX MODIFIED CONCRETE WEARING SURFACE AND APPROACH SLABS ADJACENT TO JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS; MINOR DELAMINATION AND PATCHES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
MODERATE CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND BREAKING APART OF WEARING SURFACE IN WEST SHOULDER; ALSO LARGE PATCHED AREA WITH CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND BREAKING APART OF WEARING SURFACE AROUND PATCH IN
SOUTHBOUND LANE ADJACENT TO JOINT OVER NORTH ABUTMENT.
MODERATE TO SEVERE AREA (10' x 25') OF CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND BREAKING APART OF WEARING SURFACE IN
SOUTHBOUND LANE OF CENTER SPAN, WITH SOME PATCHED AREAS.
58.5
58.6
MINOR TO MODERATE MAP CRACKING OF CONCRETE CURBS AND RAILINGS.
58.7 MODERATE GRAVEL AND SOIL ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE AND MINOR ON TOP OF CURBS.
59.1 BEARINGS NOT VISIBLE AT SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER AND SOUTH ABUTMENT DUE TO CONCRETE DIAPHRAGMS.
59.2
59.6
59.7
MINOR TO MODERATE FLAKING OF PAINT IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS; MINOR RUSTING WHERE PAINT IS FLAKING. MINOR RUSTING ALONG EDGE OF BEAM BOTTOM FLANGES. UP TO 1/4" DEEP PITTING PREDATING PAINT ON BEAM ENDS AT SOUTH PIER, END 2'
OF BOTTOM FLANGE AND BOTTOM 15" OF WEB.
59.6 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH PIER DIAPHRAGMS. MINOR MAP CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGMS AT
SOUTH ABUTMENT.
DIAPHRAGM ANGLES FIELD WELDED TO BEAM WEBS; NUMEROUS WELDS ARE CRACKED OR FULLY BROKEN; CRACKS DO NOT
APPEAR TO PROPAGATE INTO BASE METAL AT THIS TIME.
60.1
60.6
PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED AREAS AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, IN BEARING AREA, HAS MINOR DELAMINATION AND IS
STARTING TO CRACK.
MODERATE SCALING ALONG NORTHEAST WINGWALL AND NORTH ABUTMENT AT NORMAL WATER ZONE; MODERATE SPALLING
OF WINGWALL AT JUNCTION WITH RETAINING WALL.
MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT WEST END; MINOR EFFLORESCENCE
FROM PATCH ADJACENT TO CRACK.
60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION WITH MINOR SPALLING ALONG TOP OF SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS. MINOR DIAGONAL
CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALLS.
MODERATE CRACK DEVELOPING INTO SPALL ALONG TOP OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL; WINGWALL DOES NOT EXTEND TO
GROUNDLINE.
60.9
61.1
CHANNEL FLOWS AGAINST NORTH ABUTMENT, SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH PIER, AND NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL, CAUSING
MODERATE SCOUR.
60.13 MINOR TO MODERATE SCALING OF BOTH PIERS AT NORMAL WATER ZONE. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF PIER WALLS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS. HORIZONTAL CRACKING ALONG BASE OF NOSING AT TOP OF PIERS; MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING
OF TOPS OF NOSING.
60.15 FLOOD DEBRIS LODGED AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH AND NORTH PIER. MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF RECAST PIER
BEARING SEATS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
60.17 MINOR SCOUR ALONG NORTH PIER; FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 10" HIGH FOR 10' LONG ON SOUTH SIDE AND UP TO 1' HIGH FOR 6' LONG AT DOWNSTREAM END OF SOUTH SIDE; UPSTREAM END CANNOT BE OBSERVED DUE TO FLOOD DEBRIS AND WATER
FLOW TO FAST THIS INSPECTION CYCLE.
MINOR SCOUR ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH PIER WITH FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 6" HIGH FOR 10' LONG UNDER BEAMS #5
THROUGH #8.
61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.
61.4 HEAVY FLOOD DEBRIS AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF NORTH PIER AND BLOCKING UPSTREAM SIDE OF CENTER AND NORTH SPAN.
222.3 MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE TO NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST GUARDRAIL; MODERATE COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTHEAST
GUARDRAIL.
222.4 CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT NORTH APPROACH SLAB JOINT.
222.7 "BUSH KILL CREEK" AND "CREEK RD" SIGNS AT BOTH APPROACHES. "PIKE COUNTY" AND "LEHMAN TOWNSHIP" SIGNS MOUNTED
ON EAST SIDE OF CENTER SPAN; "MONROE COUNTY" SIGN ON WEST SIDE.
TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL FOUR CORNERS.
223.1
223.4
SEVERE SCALING OF NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL ALONG WATERLINE WITH SOME MISSING STONES; MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE PORTIONS OF WALL. 50' OF WALL COLLAPSED PREVIOUSLY AT DOWNSTREAM END. MODERATE
EROSION OF FILL BEHIND COLLAPSED PORTION.
223.4 MODERATE SCOUR ALONG NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL; WALL IS UNDERMINED FOR 25' LENGTH; MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 2'.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 28 25 60 54
HS 36 33 47 43
TYPE 3 33 30 56 51
TYPE 3S2 46 42 76 69
TYPE 3-3 55 50 92 83
DESIGN LOADING: 5 - HS 20
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/19/2016
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH AASHTO MANUAL FOR BRIDGE EVALUATION (MBE).
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............BUSH KILL CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........4320-009 P
3 - NORTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 14(1,2),12(2)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
423 - PENNSYLVANIA
01103 MORGAN
00000
1 6 1 00014 0
BUSH KILL CREEK
U.S. ROUTE 209
4320009P0000000
1.4 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH PARK
BOUNDARY, JUST SOUTH OF
BUSHKILL.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
1.40 (KM PT: 0.43 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR GIR
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............63.3 FT ( 19.3 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 189. FT ( 57.8 M)
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 0 - UNKNOWN
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
(46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 3 - LATEX CONCRETE OR SIMILAR A
B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................5 - HS 20 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............36 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOATONS ( 32.7
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............47 TONS ( 42.6 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/05/2019 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
https://LENGTH:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-009P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 41° 05'28.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 42.8 FT ( 13 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 75°00 '11 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 45.0 FT ( 13.7 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 5 MI ( 8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 37.0 FT ( 11.3 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 23.0 FT ( 7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 7 0 FT ( 2.1 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 7 0 FT ( 2.1 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............6500 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 15 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2011 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................7800 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 42.8 FT ( 13 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2031 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON W RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL:
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 35 - REHABILITATION - DETERIORATION
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:.......190.0 FT ( 57.9 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF FOOTIN
(225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 2000
(228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 815000
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1994-New deck & railings; Riprap placed along substruct units. 2009-New overlay; New joints over piers; New elastomeric bearings; Abut. and piers patched;
Superstructure painted.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
https://05'28.60
Inspector: Gary Goodlin Structure Number: 4320009P0000000
Inspection Date: 11/05/2019 Facility Carried: U.S. ROUTE 209
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD NPS PARK HEADQUARTERS
PHOTO 4
Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING NORTH
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE IN NORTH SPAN LOOKING SOUTH
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description LARGE PATCHED AREA WITH CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND BREAKING APART OF
WEARING SURFACE AROUND PATCH IN SOUTHBOUND LANE ADJACENT TO JOINT OVER
NORTH ABUTMENT
PHOTO 8
Description AREA (10' x 25') OF CRACKING, DELAMINATION AND BREAKING APART OF WEARING
SURFACE IN SOUTHBOUND LANE OF CENTER SPAN, WITH SOME PATCHED AREAS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TYPICAL CRACKING OF APPROACH SLABS WITH DELAMINATION AND PATCHES, SOUTH
APPROACH SLAB IN SOUTHBOUND LANE SHOWN
PHOTO 10
Description ADHESION FAILURE THROUGHOUT JOINT SEALANT OVER SOUTH ABUTMENT WITH
SEALANT MISSING IN SOME AREAS
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINT OVER SOUTH PIER; CONDITION IS SIMILAR
AT EXPANSION JOINT OVER NORTH PIER
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF CONCRETE CURBS, WEST SIDE IN NORTH SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE
PHOTO 14
Description TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE THROUGHOUT DECK
UNDERSIDE, CENTER SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description RUSTING AND PAINT FAILURE TO BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #5, FROM WEST, OVER
SOUTH PIER
PHOTO 16
Description TYPICAL PAINT FAILURE AND RUSTING TO BEAM WEBS, CENTER SPAN SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description FULLY BROKEN WELD AT BOTTOM OF BEAM #6, EAST SIDE SOUTH DIAPHRAGM ANGLE IN
SOUTH SPAN
PHOTO 18
Description FULLY BROKEN FIELD WELD AT TOP OF BEAM #3, EAST SIDE OF SOUTH DIAPHRAGM
ANGLE IN SOUTH SPAN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED AREAS AT SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, IN BEARING AREA, NOTE DELAMINATION AND CRACKING, WEST CORNER SHOWN
PHOTO 20
Description CLOSE-UP VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, IN BEARING AREA
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description SCOUR ALONG NORTH PIER, SOUTH FACE AT DOWNSTREAM END
PHOTO 22
Description DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF SOUTH PIER, NOTE ALSO NORTH PIER
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SCALING OF NORTHEAST RETAINING WALL ALONG WATERLINE WITH SOME MISSING
STONES; NOTE SCOUR WITH UNDERMINING AT THIS LOCATION
PHOTO 24
Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH APPROACH RAILING AT EAST SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO 26
Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .