Attachment 11 - 4320-049P_Toms.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

TOMS CREEK BRIDGE

U.S. ROUTE 209 OVER TOMS CREEK

DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

LOOKING NORTH

STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 11/5/2019

WEST (UPSTREAM) SIDE

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

TOMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 11/05/2019

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUDNATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

7 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 62.5 FT (19.1 M)

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 55.6 FT (16.9 M)

0 - NONE DECK WIDTH: ..................... 48.8 FT (14.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 39.3 FT (12 M)

6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

14(10) SKEW ANGLE: .................... 30 °

1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... N

2011-BRIDGE REPLACED STR. NO. 4320-010P. 2013-CHANNEL BANK EROSION

REPAIRED.

LOCATION

DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: .. 4.90 (KM PT 1.49)

STATE: .............................. 423 - PENNSYLVANIA LOCATION: .... 4.9 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH PARK

BOUNDARY.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... U.S. ROUTE 209

FEATURE INTERSECTED: TOMS CREEK

INSPECTION TEAM: G. Goodlin, W. Marte

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Gary Goodlin

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 04/08/2020

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-girder bridge is generally in good condition. Problems at this time include adhesion failure of the pourable seals at both expansion joints; collision damage to the guardrail system at the south approach; guardrail posts not in contact with the guardrail transition; and gravel and debris accumulation along both curbs. In addition, several of the anchor bolt washers at the bearings appear to be undersized for the slots in the bearing plates.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

It should be noted that this bridge is scheduled for rehabilitation in the near future under Project DEWA 14 (18),121(1). The scope of work includes cleaning and resealing of the deck joints, sealing the concrete rail surfaces, and replacement of the anchor bolt washers.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

TOMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 11/05/2019

PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

59.1

REPLACE ANCHOR BOLT WASHERS.

1 LS 2000 2000

58.5

PERIODICALLY REMOVE DEBRIS FROM ALONG

CURBLINES. 1 LS 1000 1000

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : 3000

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS.

1 LS 10000 10000

222.3 REPLACE DAMAGED SECTIONS OF

GUARDRAILS AT APPROACHES. PROPERLY

ATTACH GUARDRAIL TO GUARDRAIL POSTS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS 5000 5000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN, AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 15000 15000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 30000

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

G

G

G

G

G

G

N

G

G

N

N

N

G

N

N

G

G

N

F

G

G

G

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

G

N

F

G

G

G

G

G

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS P

3. WEARING SURFACE N

N 7 FT

SLEEPER PADS

G

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

GRAVEL, STONES

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G

5. FOUNDATIONS 05 - Piles N

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES G

8. EXPANSION JOINTS N

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION G

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1

222.1

MINOR EDGE SPALLING OF DECK SURFACE AND APPROACH SLABS ALONG CONSTRUCTION JOINTS OVER ABUTMENTS. MINOR SCRAPES ON DECK SURFACE, POSSIBLY FROM CONSTRUCTION OR STORM CLEAN-UP. MINOR DIAGONAL CRACK IN DECK

SURFACE AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE.

HAIRLINE DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAYS #1, #2, AND #4 NEAR SOUTH ABUTMENT

AND BAYS #4 AND #5 NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT.

HAIRLINE TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH OVERHANGS.

58.2 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINTS, PRIMARILY IN SHOULDERS AND SIDEWALK.

WIDESPREAD MINOR TO MODERATE ADHESION FAILURE OF POURABLE SEALS; POURABLE SEAL TORN AND MISSING WITH BACKER ROD EXPOSED IN NORTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT AND IN BOTH LANES AT NORTH EXPANSION JOINT.

58.5

58.6

MINOR VERTICAL AND MAP CRACKING OF CURBS AND RAILS. WIDESPREAD FLAKING OF CONCRETE FINISH COAT. MINOR

RANDOM CRACKING OF RAIL POST GROUT PADS.

58.7 MODERATE GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG BOTH CURBLINES, DRAINAGE INLETS AT NORTH APPROACH

CORNERS.

59.1 SEVERAL ANCHOR BOLT WASHERS UNDERSIZED FOR SLOTS IN BEARING PLATES. ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED.

SOLE PLATES ARE WARPED FROM HEAT SHRINKAGE AT WELDS.

60.1

60.11

FULL HEIGHT VERTICAL CRACK (ABOUT 8' LONG) WITH EFFLORESCENCE NEAR EAST END OF NORTH ABUTMENT, BELOW BAY #6

(BAY #1 FROM EAST).

HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACK (ABOUT 1.5' LONG) ON TOP OF SOUTH ABUTMENT BREASTWALL, BELOW BAY #1 FROM WEST.

RIPRAP IN PLACE ALONG SOUTH ABUTMENT.

60.6

60.9

61.2

RIPRAP IN PLACE AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

61.1 FLOW DIRECTED TOWARD NORTH ABUTMENT DURING PERIODS OF NORMAL TO HIGH FLOW.

61.2 MINOR SLOUGHING ALONG NORTH DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL BANK.

61.2 SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR SCOUR EVALUATION.

61.4 FALLEN TREES AND FLOOD DEBRIS ALONG UPSTREAM CHANNEL.

222.3

36.B

COLLISION DAMAGE TO BOTH SOUTH APPROACH GUARDRAILS (ABOUT 15'). 4 GUARDRAIL POSTS AT SOUTHWEST TRANSITION, 2 AT NORTHEAST AND 3 AT NORTHWEST ARE NOT IN CONTACT WITH GUARDRAIL.

222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS.

222.9 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING AND EDGE SPALLING AT TOP OF BOTH SLEEPER SLABS.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 48 44 71 64

HS 60 54 89 81

TYPE 3 55 50 82 74

TYPE 3S2 82 74 122 111

TYPE 3-3 98 89 145 132

DESIGN LOADING: A - HL 93

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 03/01/2016

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: CONCRETE TENSION (INVENTORY), GIRDER MOMENT

(OPERATING)

REMARKS: DESIGN RATING FACTOR = 1.28 (INVENTORY), 2.02 (OPERATING)

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............TOMS CREEK BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........4320-049 P

3 - NORTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................NPS

(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 14(10)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

423 - PENNSYLVANIA

01103 MORGAN

00000

1 6 1 00014 0

TOMS CREEK

U.S. ROUTE 209

4320049P0000000

4 9 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH PARK

BOUNDARY.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

4 90 (KM PT: 1.49 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR GIR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............001 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............55.6 FT ( 16.9 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 62.5 FT ( 19.1 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................A - HL 93 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............60 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOATONS ( 54.4

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............89 TONS ( 80.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 11/05/2019 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://LENGTH:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-049P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 41° 07'29 50 " (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 39.3 FT ( 12 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 74 57° '12 80 " (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 48.8 FT ( 14.9 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 14 MI ( 23 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 46.0 FT ( 14 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 40.0 FT ( 12.2 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 3 0 FT ( 0.9 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............5000 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 30 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2011 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................6000 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 39.3 FT ( 12 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2031 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 - NO NAVIGATION CONTROL ON W RIGHT:.................................. 6 0 FT ( 1.8 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT REQUIR MATERIAL:........................... 1 - CONCRETE

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 2.67 FT ( 0 81 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 1 1 1 1

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... 35 - REHABILITATION - DETERIORATION

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. 1 - WORK TO BE DONE BY CONTRACT

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:.......62.5 FT ( 19.1 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF FOOTIN

(225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 3000

(228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 30000

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2011-BRIDGE REPLACED STR. NO. 4320-010P. 2013-CHANNEL BANK EROSION REPAIRED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

https://LENGTH:

Inspector: Gary Goodlin Structure Number: 4320049P0000000

Inspection Date: 11/05/2019 Facility Carried: U.S. ROUTE 209

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD BUSHKILL

PHOTO 4

Description EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO 6

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF STRUCTURE LOOKING SOUTH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description DIAGONAL CRACK IN DECK SURFACE AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF BRIDGE

PHOTO 8

Description MISSING POURABLE SEAL IN NORTHBOUND LANE AT SOUTH EXPANSION JOINT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description MISSING POURABLE SEAL IN BOTH LANES AT NORTH EXPANSION JOINT

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG WEST CURBLINE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPICAL GRAVEL AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG EAST CURBLINE

PHOTO 12

Description DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAY #5 NEAR

NORTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAY #1 NEAR

SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 14

Description DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK UNDERSIDE IN BAY #2 NEAR

SOUTH ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description TYPICAL ANCHOR BOLT WASHERS UNDERSIZED FOR SLOTS IN BEARING PLATES; ALSO

NOTE ANCHOR BOLT NUTS NOT FULLY SEATED, BEARING #4 AT SOUTH ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO 16

Description GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT; NOTE WATER FLOW DIRECTED TOWARD

ABUTMENT

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO 18

Description NORTH ABU BAY #6

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description COLLISION DAMAGE TO SOUTH APPROACH GUARDRAIL ON WEST SIDE

PHOTO 20

Description GUARDRAIL POSTS IN SOUTHWEST TRANSITION NOT IN CONTACT WITH GUARDRAIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM

PHOTO 22

Description VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM