Attachment 7 - (Draft) Past Performance Information Sheet (PPIS).docx

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Solicitation FA8003-23-R-0003 Attachment 7: Past Performance Information Sheet The 771 Enterprise Sourcing Squadron of the Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC) is in the process of competitively selecting sources for Geospatial Support & Services (GS&S) 2.0 program. The GS&S 2.0 program is predominantly professional services. The program also includes tasks associated with USAF Geospatial Agency Program Management and/or Geospatial Program Office Operations Support; Requirements Elicitation (Collection, Development, Analysis, and Synthesis); Geospatial Strategic Support; Communications, Education, and Training Support; Geospatial Data; Geospatial Analysis and Data Presentation Support; Geospatial IT System Support and Management; System Assessment and Authorization; IT Portfolio Management Activities; Application Development, Modernization, and Sustainment; Helpdesk Services and Customer Support Services; and Surge/Contingency Support.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the Offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror’s performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 01 April 2023. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

The offeror who has nominated you as a Point of Contact for this effort has completed Section 1 below. In order to provide a complete assessment, please complete Section 2 through Section 5 in the attached Past Performance Information Sheet. See Attachment 2 for Relevant Work descriptions.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed frank.batz@us.af.mil. Please call Frank Batz at 570-640-7193 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Frank Batz, Procuring Contracting Officer

Attachment :

Past Performance Information Sheet Relevant Work Descriptions

Section 1: Contract Identification (completed by the Offeror)

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Contract Included (Please select all that apply):

☐ Communication & Training ☐ Program Management ☐ Data & Technical Management ☐ Rapid Response ☐ Other

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification (completed by the…?)

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Effort/ Contract Specifics (completed by the…Offeror’s customer/client?)

If any information provided by the Offeror above is incorrect and/or requires more detail, please elaborate below.

☐ Information in Section 1 is correct (Skip to Section 5)

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Period of Performance

4. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

5. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

6. Reason for difference (if applicable):

H. Contract Dollar Value

4. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

5. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

6. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Contract Included (Select all that Apply):

☐ Communication & Training ☐ Program Management ☐ Data & Technical Management ☐ Rapid Response ☐ Other

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Section 5: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

8. Identified problems as they occurred.

9. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

10. Met established project schedules.

11. Met contract terms without failure.

12. Was responsive to contract changes.

13. Provided adequate project supervision.

14. Demonstrated cost control.

15. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

16. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

17. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

18. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

19. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

T1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the specification?

T2. How was the quality of technical system operations & maintenance testing and certification efforts?

T3. How was the quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts?

T4. How adequate/effective was the System Engineering Process?

T5. How well did the contractor implement current quality processes, standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T6. How well did the contractor implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control?

T7. How adequate/effective were the contractor’s environmental safety procedures?

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

P3. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P4. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P5. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?

P6. How well did the contractor manage quality/effectiveness of subcontracted efforts?

P7. How effective was the contractor’s material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)?

P8. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

P9. Of what benefit to the customer were contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors?

P10. To what degree did the contractor implement responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support?

TP1. How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?

TP2. How effective was the contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

S1. If the contract included FAR 52.219-9, to what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-9 was not included in the contract)

S2. If the contract included FAR 52.219-8, how effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

(Please state if FAR 52.219-8 was not included in the contract)

C1. How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?

C2. How well did the contractor meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs?

C3. How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C4. How sufficient and timely was the contractor’s cost reporting?

Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Section 6: General Comment Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired:

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail: frank.batz@us.af.mil or Mail to: Frank Batz 1940 Allbrook Drive Area A, Bldg. 1, Rm. 300 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45430

Relevant Work Descriptions:

1. Communication & Training. Past experience includes but is not limited to: working with USAF offices for increased capability/program awareness; developing and/or maintaining communications materials such as capability and program brochures, white papers, and fact sheets; providing training on GPS/GIS equipment/software currently used by the AF; working with military Public Affairs (PA) offices for increased capability/program awareness, event planning, including site selection analysis, preparing event approval documentation, coordinating event registration, coordinating the event management committee, assisting in development and deployment of event materials including the event schedule/agenda for attendees; providing geospatial technology training onsite and virtual including training on equipment, hands on training with GIS software, geospatial data for 10+ students per class, customers/audience using curriculum or syllabus, and working with commercial PR/PA/marketing offices for increased capability/program awareness.

2. Program Management. Past experience includes but is not limited to: providing enterprise architecture (integrating GIS solutions across an enterprise) adoption across multiple domains; providing geospatial strategic consulting for other Government Agencies including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities; providing on-site program management of a GeoBase program or installation geospatial information and services for a DoD entity; providing non-government entity geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support; developing geospatial segment architectures; providing geospatial strategic consulting for non-government entities including strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and feasibility studies for future capabilities; and assisting other Government Agencies (federal, state, local) geospatial program office providing non-intelligence decision making support.

3. Data & Technical Management. Past experience includes but is not limited to: Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment (SDSFIE); conducting work generated from AFI 17-140 "DAF Architecture Framework;” DOTmLPF-P; solving problems using DOTmLPF-P to build Plans, strategies, approaches, needs analysis studies, and Concepts of Operation (CONOPS); conducting work with only solution architectures; conducting work generated from DoDI "DoD Architecture Framework;” and conducting work generated from "Zachman Architecture Framework.”

4. Rapid Response. Past experience includes but is not limited to: rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).Experience conducting work generated from AFI 17-140 "DAF Architecture Framework;” held a Federal contract and exercised a capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance; provided reach back support, short and long-term, to support surge and crisis response; rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (greater than 48 hours of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.); responding to outages and restoring supported systems within 24 hours (24/7/365); held a Federal contract with capability to conduct operations away from primary place of performance; and rapidly capturing/collecting, processing, and delivering (within 14 days of notification/crisis) raster data (i.e., orthorectified nadir aerial imagery, oblique aerial imagery, LiDAR data, thermal data, etc.) that has been used for decision making during an urgent need (i.e., crisis/emergency, after a natural disaster, etc.).

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Page 8 of 8