Attachment 6B - Draft Workload Framework Examples (Track 2).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFIPVField2027
About this file
This is a draft workload framework example document that illustrates evaluation models for the Personnel Vetting (PV) Fieldwork Services requirement. The document presents five scenarios ranging from two to five competing vendors, demonstrating how scoring would be applied across multiple evaluation factors and how workload allocation percentages would be distributed among awarded contractors.
The evaluation methodology uses a 125-point scale comprising four weighted factors: Price (50 points), Timeliness (25 points), Quality (25 points), and Average Case Age (25 points). Categorical ratings for Timeliness and Quality range from "Exceptional" (25 points) to "Unsatisfactory" (5 points), while Average Case Age is ranked with the fastest turnaround receiving the highest points. Specific line items are priced per unit across 21 service categories (K005 through K032), including trust tier upgrades, CV issue resolution, background checks (law, education, employment, financial, psychological/substance abuse), record checks, personal source interviews, and premium in-person services. Total contract values in the examples range from approximately $6.98 million to $7.66 million based on assumed volumes of 1,000 units per line item. Work allocation percentages vary by scenario: in the two-vendor model, allocation is 60/40; in the five-vendor model, it ranges from 50% for the highest-ranked vendor down to 10% for the lowest-ranked vendor. The document serves as an instructional tool showing how the government would evaluate competing proposals and distribute workload based on performance and cost metrics.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Summary
2 VENDOR MODEL
| TOTAL | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Final Points | Vendor A | Vendor B | Final Rank | Vendor A | Vendor B | Allocation | Vendor A | Vendor B |
| POINTS POSSIBLE | 50 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 125 | ALL ITEMS | 115 | 90 | ALL ITEMS | 1 | 2 | ALL ITEMS | 60% | 40% |
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 50 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 115 |
| Vendor B | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 25 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 90 |
3 VENDOR MODEL
| TOTAL | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Final Points | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Final Rank | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Allocation | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C |
| POINTS POSSIBLE | 50 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 125 | ALL ITEMS | 90 | 85 | 115 | ALL ITEMS | 2 | 3 | 1 | ALL ITEMS | 30% | 20% | 50% |
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 35 | 25 | 25 | 5 | 90 |
| Vendor B | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 20 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 85 |
| Vendor C | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 50 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 115 |
4 VENDOR MODEL
| TOTAL | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Final Points | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Final Rank | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Allocation | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D |
| POINTS POSSIBLE | 50 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 125 | ALL ITEMS | 95 | 85 | 120 | 75 | ALL ITEMS | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | ALL ITEMS | 25% | 20% | 40% | 15% |
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 35 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 95 |
| Vendor B | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 20 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 85 |
| Vendor C | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 50 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 120 |
| Vendor D | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 10 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 75 |
5 VENDOR MODEL
| TOTAL | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Final Points | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Final Rank | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Allocation | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E |
| POINTS POSSIBLE | 50 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 125 | ALL ITEMS | 90 | 85 | 110 | 75 | 95 | ALL ITEMS | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | ALL ITEMS | 15% | 15% | 30% | 10% | 30% |
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 30 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 90 |
| Vendor B | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 20 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 85 |
| Vendor C | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 40 | 25 | 25 | 20 | 110 |
| Vendor D | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 10 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 75 |
| Vendor E | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points |
| ALL ITEMS | 50 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 95 |
Pricing
| Item # | PV Fieldwork Product | Total Volume | Vendor A | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor E | 2 Vendor | |||||||||||||||||||
| K005 | Upgrade of Trust: Low Tier to Moderate Tier | 1000 | $ 325.00 | $ 325,000.00 | $ 333.00 | $ 333,000.00 | $ 325.00 | $ 325,000.00 | $ 333.00 | $ 333,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | Price | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| K006 | Upgrade of Trust: Moderate Tier to High Tier | 1000 | $ 425.00 | $ 425,000.00 | $ 421.00 | $ 421,000.00 | $ 350.00 | $ 350,000.00 | $ 421.00 | $ 421,000.00 | $ 350.00 | $ 350,000.00 | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | ||||||||||||||
| K007 | CV Issue Resolution | 1000 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 130.00 | $ 130,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 130.00 | $ 130,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | All Items | $ 7,413,000.00 | $ 7,561,000.00 | All Items | 1 | 2 | All Items | 50 | 25 | 1st | 50 | |||||||||
| K008 | CV RSI Case-Virtual | 1000 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | 2nd | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K009 | CV RSI In-Person Premium | 1000 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K010 | TBC - Law In Person – No Record | 1000 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 145.00 | $ 145,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 145.00 | $ 145,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K011 | TBC - Law In Person - Record | 1000 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 295.00 | $ 295,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 295.00 | $ 295,000.00 | 3 Vendor | |||||||||||||||||||
| K012 | TBC - Law Other than In-Person - No Record | 1000 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | Price | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| K013 | TBC - Law Other than In-Person - Record | 1000 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 130.00 | $ 130,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | $ 130.00 | $ 130,000.00 | $ 140.00 | $ 140,000.00 | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | |||||||||||
| K014 | TBC - Record Fee(s) | 1000 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | $ 320.00 | $ 320,000.00 | $ 305.00 | $ 305,000.00 | All Items | $ 7,413,000.00 | $ 7,561,000.00 | $ 7,263,000.00 | All Items | 2 | 3 | 1 | All Items | 35 | 20 | 50 | 1st | 50 | ||||||
| K015 | Time Based Checks (EMPL) | 1000 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 310.00 | $ 310,000.00 | 2nd | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K016 | ESI | 1000 | $ 705.00 | $ 705,000.00 | $ 698.00 | $ 698,000.00 | $ 700.00 | $ 700,000.00 | $ 730.00 | $ 730,000.00 | $ 680.00 | $ 680,000.00 | 3rd | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K017 | TESI | 1000 | $ 650.00 | $ 650,000.00 | $ 675.00 | $ 675,000.00 | $ 650.00 | $ 650,000.00 | $ 675.00 | $ 675,000.00 | $ 600.00 | $ 600,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K018 | SUBC | 1000 | $ 300.00 | $ 300,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 300.00 | $ 300,000.00 | $ 350.00 | $ 350,000.00 | $ 250.00 | $ 250,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K019 | Law Record Check | 1000 | $ 155.00 | $ 155,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 155.00 | $ 155,000.00 | $ 155.00 | $ 155,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | 4 Vendor | |||||||||||||||||||
| K020 | Education Record Check | 1000 | $ 120.00 | $ 120,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 120.00 | $ 120,000.00 | $ 155.00 | $ 155,000.00 | $ 120.00 | $ 120,000.00 | Price | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| K021 | Employment Record Check | 1000 | $ 121.00 | $ 121,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 121.00 | $ 121,000.00 | $ 155.00 | $ 155,000.00 | $ 120.00 | $ 120,000.00 | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | ||||||||
| K022 | Financial Record Check | 1000 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 185.00 | $ 185,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | All Items | $ 7,413,000.00 | $ 7,561,000.00 | $ 7,263,000.00 | $ 7,661,000.00 | All Items | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | All Items | 35 | 20 | 50 | 10 | 1st | 50 | |||
| K023 | Alcohol/Drugs/Psychological Conditions Record Check | 1000 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 200.00 | $ 200,000.00 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 205.00 | $ 205,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | 2nd | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K024 | Public Record Check | 1000 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 175.00 | $ 175,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | $ 150.00 | $ 150,000.00 | 3rd | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K025 | Employment Coverage to include Record and Personal | 1000 | $ 241.00 | $ 241,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 241.00 | $ 241,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 220.00 | $ 220,000.00 | 4th | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
| K026 | Education Coverage to include Record and Personal | 1000 | $ 241.00 | $ 241,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 241.00 | $ 241,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 220.00 | $ 220,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K027 | Alcohol/Drugs/Psychological Conditions Personal Source | 1000 | $ 269.00 | $ 269,000.00 | $ 315.00 | $ 315,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 300.00 | $ 300,000.00 | $ 220.00 | $ 220,000.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| K028 | General Personal Source Coverage for EFI flags | 1000 | $ 230.00 | $ 230,000.00 | $ 232.00 | $ 232,000.00 | $ 230.00 | $ 230,000.00 | $ 232.00 | $ 232,000.00 | $ 230.00 | $ 230,000.00 | 5 Vendor | |||||||||||||||||||
| K029 | Former Spouse Personal Interview | 1000 | $ 281.00 | $ 281,000.00 | $ 275.00 | $ 275,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | $ 275.00 | $ 275,000.00 | $ 245.00 | $ 245,000.00 | Price | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| K030 | Social Reference | 1000 | $ 198.00 | $ 198,000.00 | $ 159.00 | $ 159,000.00 | $ 198.00 | $ 198,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | $ 195.00 | $ 195,000.00 | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | |||||
| K031 | Personal Sources for Residence Coverage | 1000 | $ 181.00 | $ 181,000.00 | $ 182.00 | $ 182,000.00 | $ 181.00 | $ 181,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | All Items | $ 7,413,000.00 | $ 7,561,000.00 | $ 7,263,000.00 | $ 7,661,000.00 | $ 6,985,000.00 | All Items | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | All Items | 30 | 20 | 40 | 10 | 50 | 1st | 50 |
| K032 | In-Person Premium for Item Level | 1000 | $ 181.00 | $ 181,000.00 | $ 176.00 | $ 176,000.00 | $ 181.00 | $ 181,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | $ 180.00 | $ 180,000.00 | 2nd | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 28000 | $ 7,413,000.00 | $ 7,561,000.00 | $ 7,263,000.00 | $ 7,661,000.00 | $ 6,985,000.00 | 3rd | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4th | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The unit prices above are for the example models only and do not reflect Government estimates. | 5th | 10 |
Timeliness
| 2 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||
| Timeliness Score | Categorical Rating | Points | Valuation | |||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | |||||||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | Exceptional | Very Good | 25 | 20 | Exceptional | 25 | ||||
| Very Good | 20 | |||||||||||
| Satsifactory | 15 | |||||||||||
| Marginal | 10 | |||||||||||
| 3 VENDOR MODEL | Unsatisfactory | 5 | ||||||||||
| Timeliness Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | 25 | 20 | 25 |
| 4 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||||
| Timeliness Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | ||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | 98.52% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | Exceptional | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 |
| 5 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||||||
| Timeliness Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | ||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | 98.52% | 96.66% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | Exceptional | Very Good | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 20 |
Quality
| 2 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||
| Quality Score | Categorical Rating | Points | Valuation | |||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | |||||||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | Exceptional | Very Good | 25 | 20 | Exceptional | 25 | ||||
| Very Good | 20 | |||||||||||
| Satsifactory | 15 | |||||||||||
| Marginal | 10 | |||||||||||
| 3 VENDOR MODEL | Unsatisfactory | 5 | ||||||||||
| Quality Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | 25 | 20 | 25 |
| 4 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||||
| Quality Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | ||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | 98.52% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | Exceptional | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 |
| 5 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||||||
| Quality Score | Categorical Rating | Points | ||||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | ||
| ALL ITEMS | 98.99% | 97.55% | 99.01% | 98.52% | 96.66% | Exceptional | Very Good | Exceptional | Exceptional | Very Good | 25 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 20 |
Age
| 2 VENDOR MODEL | |||||||||
| Average Case Age | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor A | Vendor B | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 14.96 | 12.56 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 25 | 1st | 25 | |
| 2nd | 15 |
| 3 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||
| Average Case Age | Rank | Points | Valuation | |||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 14.96 | 12.56 | 13.5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 1st | 25 | |
| 2nd | 15 | |||||||||||
| 3rd | 5 |
| 4 VENDOR MODEL | |||||||||||||||
| Average Case Age | Rank | Points | Valuation | ||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 14.96 | 12.56 | 13.5 | 14.1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 1st | 25 | |
| 2nd | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| 3rd | 15 | ||||||||||||||
| 4th | 10 |
| 5 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average Case Age | Rank | Points | Valuation | |||||||||||||||
| Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Vendor D | Vendor E | ||||
| ALL ITEMS | 14.96 | 12.56 | 13.5 | 14.1 | 15.9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 1st | 25 | |
| 2nd | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
| 3rd | 15 | |||||||||||||||||
| 4th | 10 | |||||||||||||||||
| 5th | 5 |
Snapshot
| 2 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Rank | Allocation | |
| ALL ITEMS | 50 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 115 | 1 | 60% |
| 3 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Rank | Allocation | |
| ALL ITEMS | 35 | 25 | 25 | 5 | 90 | 2 | 30% |
| 4 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Rank | Allocation | |
| ALL ITEMS | 35 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 95 | 2 | 25% |
| 5 VENDOR MODEL | ||||||||
| Vendor A | Price | Timeliness | Quality | Average Age | Total Points | Rank | Allocation | |
| ALL ITEMS | 30 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 90 | 3 | 15% |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .