Attachment 6A - Draft Workload Framework Examples (Track 1).xlsx

This is a draft workload framework examples spreadsheet for the DCSA Personnel Vetting Fieldwork Services requirement, demonstrating evaluation methodologies for two and three vendor models.

The document presents example scoring scenarios across four evaluation criteria: pricing, timeliness, quality, and average case age. Each criterion has a maximum point value (pricing 50 points, timeliness 25 points, quality 25 points, average case age 25 points) for a total of 125 possible points. The framework uses three workload tiers—Low Tier (LT), Medium Tier (MT), and High Tier (HT)—to categorize fieldwork by complexity or volume. For the two-vendor model, example scenarios show Vendor A and B competing for tier allocations ranging from 40% to 60%, with final rankings and point totals. For the three-vendor model, allocations are distributed across three vendors at 20%, 30%, and 50% per tier based on scoring performance. Pricing examples show unit prices ranging from $110 to $710 depending on tier and vendor. Timeliness is evaluated using percentage scores with categorical ratings from "Exceptional" (25 points) to "Unsatisfactory" (5 points), and quality scores similarly range from 98.99% to 92.99% across vendors. Average case age is ranked based on days, with lower ages receiving higher point values. The framework demonstrates how different vendor performance levels would result in varying workload allocations and contract awards under both competitive models.