Attachment 6 - PWS App G - DFSP Tampa.pdf

Performance Work Statement Appendix G

DFSP TAMPA, FL Site Specific Information

SPE603-20-R-0521

ATTACHMENT 6

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

APPENDIX G

DEFENSE FUEL SUPPLY POINT TAMPA, FL

SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION

26 August 2020

Defense Fuel Supply Point Tampa, FL

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Defense Fuel Supply Point (DFSP) Tampa facility is located at MacDill Air Force Base

(AFB) in Tampa, FL, and has been in operation since 1952 and became DLA capitalized fuel in

1954. The facility includes a tank farm containing aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), truck racks, a pump house, and distribution lines. Historical records indicate that gasoline, diesel fuel, aviation gasoline, and jet propellant (JP)-4, JP-5, and JP-8 have been stored and dispensed at this facility. Currently, the facility dispenses JP-8 from three 55,000-gallon ASTs.

MacDill AFB is located on the southern tip of the Interbay Peninsula, approximately 8 miles south of the city of Tampa, in Hillsborough County, Florida, and encompasses approximately

5,767 acres. The installation is bordered by Tampa Bay to the south and west, Hillsborough Bay to the east, and residential and commercial properties to the north. MacDill AFB was established on 24 May 1939 as Southeast Air Base, Tampa, and formally dedicated on 16 April 1941. The installation was renamed MacDill AFB in 1948 and was an operational base for the Strategic Air

Command (SAC). The 1991 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission (BRACC) recommended that MacDill AFB undergo partial closure and realignment as per the Defense

Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990. The BRACC reversed its recommendation regarding

MacDill AFB flightline operations in 1995, and in 1996 the 43rd Air Refueling Group from

Malmstrom AFB in Montana was relocated to MacDill AFB. MacDill AFB has been operated by the redesignated 6th Air Refueling Wing, under the Air Mobility Command, with several military and nonmilitary tenants since 1 October 1996. Pursuant to BRAC action, the Air Force

Reserve Command’s 927th Air Refueling Wing relocated from Selfridge Air National Guard

Base, Michigan, to MacDill AFB in April 2008 (HGL, 2015).

1.1 Environmental History:

In 1995, environmental investigations began at the facility. Both soil and groundwater were documented to have been impacted by releases of fuels, with exceedances of FDEP soil and groundwater Cleanup Target Levels (GCTLs). In October 2000, an air sparge system was installed at the pump house and pipeline site.4 Air sparge system operation continued until the system was deactivated in April 2010.

In March 2007, a Site Rehabilitation Completion Order (SRCO) for no further action (NFA) was issued by FDEP for tanks 1, 2, 4, and 6. Groundwater monitoring activities continued at Tank 3 and Tank 5. In June 2009, calcium peroxide injections were conducted at 60 Tank 7 area locations to increase dissolved oxygen levels. In September 2009, additional injections of a microbiological application were conducted at 69 points. In April 2012, a Remedial Action Plan

(RAP) Modification was recommended based on saturated zone impacts at the site. The plan was subsequently approved by FDEP. The proposed modification incorporated dewatering and saturated zone source removal. The RAP Modification was conducted in 2013. During excavation activities, contaminated soil was removed and disposed at a local facility. The excavation area was then backfilled and graded. Post-treatment groundwater sampling results were below GCTLs in all wells except monitoring well (MW)-75R, which was slightly above the

GCTLs for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH). Quarterly Post Active Remedial

Monitoring (PARM) activities were anticipated to occur in fiscal year 2014 (FY14) followed by site close-out in FY15; however, site activities did not occur as planned due to contracting delays. Quarterly PARM activities and one additional well installations are expected to occur in

FY15 to demonstrate that concentrations are below GCTLs in support of site closeout.

In June 2011, Tank 5 received an NFA notice and monitoring wells were removed from the site.

In 2012, a request for a small stable plume NFA for Tank 3 was denied by FDEP, as there was a concern that contamination was linked to the adjacent pump house and pipeline site.

Additionally, the May 2013 groundwater monitoring results indicated naphthalene concentrations were above the GCTLs. FDEP stated that closure at the tank basin is contingent on completion of the pump house area excavation, and that groundwater monitoring activities at the site must continue until the pump house excavation has been completed. Excavation activities were completed at the pump house in 2014.

The December 2014 groundwater sampling event indicated that none of the contaminants of concern exceeded GCTLs; however, regulators are requiring the installation of one additional monitoring well and additional sampling to demonstrate that cleanup levels have been achieved before the site can be closed. These activities were scheduled for FY15.

As of January 2020, groundwater sampling events had been ongoing based on the NAM criteria in Chapter 62-780.690(2) (g), Florida Administrative Code (FAC), a minimum of four groundwater sampling events is required and site rehabilitation shall be considered complete when the No Further Action criteria in subsection 62-770.680(1), 62-770-680(2), or 62-

770.680(3). Final closure has been issued for Tank 1, Tank Basin 3, Tank 7, Truck Rack, and

Pump-house/Pipeline sites with Land Use Controls (LUCs).

1.2 Operational Status

In 1996 an active remediation system was installed near the generator building. It operated until

2011, when it was shut down for rebound testing. After three years, the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) levels had reached acceptable levels across the area, however RWQCB did not grant No Further Action status due to concerns of soil vapor levels under the generator building as well as seasonal fluctuations in the dissolved phase TPH in groundwater. A new groundwater extraction and treatment system was installed as part of the IRAP in 2018 and began operating in early 2019. A current SRM contract through AFCEC is working on the

Demolition Design for the Facility. This includes the design for the complete demolition of any aboveground facilities including the generator building. It is assumed that some of source material will be removed during the course of this demolition. If confirmation sampling demonstrates further contamination under the building, additional source material will need to be removed in accordance with all applicable regulations.

1.3 Tank Farm

The DFSP is a bulk petroleum terminal dedicated to the supply of military specification jet propulsion grade 8 (JP-8) jet fuel to MacDill AFB, and has provided intermediate bulk fuel storage with pipeline and tank truck delivery capabilities since 1952. The facility is operated by a contractor and is located at the northwest corner of the MacDill AFB property near Port

Tampa. This facility is located within the southwest corner of Section 20, Township 29 South, and Range 17 east.

Historical records indicate that, in addition to JP-8, gasoline, diesel fuel, aviation gasoline, aviation gas sludge, tetraethyl lead, and JP-4 and JP-5 jet fuels may have been stored, spilled, dispensed, and disposed of at the facility. Fuel leaks and disposal of tank bottom sludge material containing lead from aviation gas have been identified as the principle potential contaminant sources (EPA, 1990). The active components associated with the DFSP terminal currently consist of three 55,000-barrel ASTs (#1, #2, and #3), a pumping station east of the ASTs, tank truck loading racks east of the terminal office building, and associated product distribution lines.

Former ASTs #4, #5, #6, and #7 were located in the grass field south of the active ASTs and have been removed from the site.

The table below lists the known information about each AST, based on information provided in the Historical Data Review Report (CB&I, 2017e), the SAR (QORE, 2003), and the Source

Removal Report for tank basins #5, #6, and #7 (QORE, 2010b). The three operational tanks were refurbished in 2000, including new tank bottoms and “telltale” leak detection. Former AST

#4 was dismantled in June 2009 and the surrounding earthen berm was graded into the surrounding ground surface. Former ASTs #5, #6, and #7 were taken out of service and dismantled in January 2003.

AST

No.

Known Product Stored

Nominal Capacity

(Barrels/Gallons)

Safe Fill Capacity (Barrels/Gallons)

Installation Date

Status

1 JP-8 55,000/ 2,310,000 49,339/ 2,072,238 1952 In Service

2 JP-8 55,000/ 2,310,000 47,414/ 1,991,388 1952 In Service

3 JP-8 55,000/ 2,310,000 50,352/ 2,114,784 1952 In Service

4 JP-8 35,000/ 1,470,000 30,063/ 1,262,646 1952 Removed

5 JP-8 27,000/ 1,134,000 - 1953 Removed

6 JP-8 55,000/ 2,310,000 - 1953 Removed

7 JP-8 55,000/ 2,310,000 - 1953 Removed

SECTION 2.0 GENERAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Remedial Requirements

Remedial Action Plans (RAP) utilizing Land Use Control Implementation Plans (LUCIP) to designate cleanup objectives for all five (5) sites located at DFSP Tampa, MacDill AFB in

Tampa, Florida. The five sites that require the LUCIP are as follows:

- AST #1

- AST #3

- AST #7

- Truck Rack

- Pump House/ Pipeline

The FLDEP LUCIP requirements for DFSP Tampa are:

Annual physical inspection of the sites included in the LUCIP. This task includes an inspection and reporting to FDEP of no construction and/or spills at each site. This action is to be completed by DLA personnel.

Collect groundwater samples on a five year recurring basis from up to 4 wells per

LUCIP. A total of 10 wells will be sampled. The sampling will consist of monitoring for

TRPH by FLPRO Method. All analytical results will be submitted to FDEP as part of the monitoring event. See Section 3.1.3 for performance requirements.

If groundwater samples indicate contaminant concentrations below the FDEDP

Groundwater Cleanup Target Level (GCTL), one additional groundwater sampling event for up to 5 wells will be conducted for TRPH by the FLPRO Method after an approximate 3 month period following the initial sample. See Section 3.1.3 for performance requirements.

SECTION 3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Site Remediation Performance Requirements

For DFSP Tampa, the following actions are required to be completed by contractor upon receipt of a task order (see PWS Section 2.2.1):

3.1.1 Annual Environmental Regulations Review – [Proposal Price Worksheet (PPW)

Reference Item 001]

IAW with PWS Requirement Tasks 2, 4, and 5, the contractor shall provide an annual

Environmental Compliance Review of new/upcoming environmental regulations that apply to the site. This requirement will consist of an email to the COR/CS/CO with the relevant regulation notated and a brief summary stating how the regulation is applicable to the site. If no new/relevant regulations are identified, then the contractor shall provide an email stating negative results/findings.

3.1.2 Emergency Spill Consultation – [PPW Reference Item 002]

IAW PWS Requirement Tasks 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8, the contractor shall provide Spill Consultation for DFSP Tampa. The contractor shall provide a project manager to travel to the site of a release as requested by DLA. The Contractor will respond within eight hours (8), including travel time, when notified of an emergency or requirements outside of core working hours by DLA such as a fuel release or a discovery of contamination that requires immediate emergency services to mitigate the risk to human health and the environment. This requirement is applicable for responding to both on and off-site (those beyond the sites in the site-specific appendices) area emergencies. The Project Manager shall inspect the spill site, determine what on-site and off-site impacts have occurred or might occur, observe spill response activities, provide recommendations going forward and any other information the PM believes may be relevant.

This information should be provided as soon as possible via telephone to the COR, CS and/or

CO, followed up with a brief summary detailing the PM’s observations via email within 24 hours. The Contractor PM should complete the inspection within ten (10) hours of arrival at the site unless otherwise approved by the CS/CO. The Contractor PM’s role here is to be DLA’s

“eyes and ears” at the spill site. The contract does not require direct spill response or spill response management, only consultation.

3.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring – [PPW Reference Item 003]

IAW PWS Requirement Tasks 3 and 4, the contractor shall provide including but not limited to low flow groundwater monitoring at two currently installed wells at each site. If the event shows

TRPH concentrations below GCTL a second round of confirmation monitoring will be performed 3 months later to initiate site closure. Containing purge water in drums or bulk containment, disposal as non-hazardous waste via truck to a RCRA approved off site facility within 50 miles of the site when possible.

Well Parameters:

10, 2-inch wells

Average sample depth of 8 feet below ground surface (bgs)

Average depth to groundwater of 3 foot bgs

Average total well depth of 13 feet bgs

Assumptions:

Stage 1 Data/QC Analysis and standard turnaround time

QA/QC sampling but no split samples required

Data Management

Perform data evaluation/validation, including Stage 1 lab data review

Submit data electronically

Submit a standard monitoring report

Safety Level D

3.1.4 Well Abandonment and Site Closeout – [PPW Reference Item 004]

IAW PWS Requirement Tasks 2, 3, 4, and 9, the contractor shall provide including but not limited to abandoning in place all current wells, removal and turn over to DLA Disposition

Services all equipment leading to closure of the system. Prepare site close-out documentation.

Well Parameters:

Abandon in-place 31, two-inch wells

Average well depth is 13 feet bgs

Well Assumptions:

Assume monitoring wells are constructed of PVC schedule 40

Formation type is unconsolidated

Safety Level D

3.2 Site Compliance Requirements

IAW PWS Requirement Task 7 the contractor shall provide environmental compliance services if needed. DFSP Tampa is designated as a Permitted Facility by DLA, meaning DLA is responsible for all environmental compliance at the facility. While there are no specific needs at this time, potential compliance requirements that may be required under this contract include but are not limited to:

NPDES Discharge monitoring, reporting or permitting

Permit renewal/application preparation

Air emissions monitoring, reporting or permitting

Natural/cultural resources surveys

SPCC/FRP preparation/support

Wetlands surveys

Tank/system closure application preparation and oversight

NEPA support

Compliance audit support

Asbestos sampling/remediation/disposal

Coastal Zone Management Act support

Type Well # Value

MD16‐24PZ‐4S $910.88

MD16‐MW04 $910.88

MD16‐MW05 $910.88

MD16‐MW06 $910.88

MD16‐MW10 $910.88

MD16‐MW11 $910.88

MD16‐MW12 $910.88

MD16‐MW21R $910.88

MD16‐MW22R $910.88

MD16‐MW23R $910.88

MD16‐MW25 $910.88

MD16‐MW26R $910.88

MD16‐MW27R $910.88

MD16‐MW31R $910.88

MD16‐MW32 $910.88

MD16‐MW34R $910.88

MD16‐MW38 $910.88

MD16‐MW39 $910.88

MD16‐MW40 $910.88

MD16‐MW41 $910.88

MD16‐MW42 $910.88

MD16‐MW43 $910.88

MD16‐MW45 $910.88

MD16‐MW46R $910.88

MD16‐MW48 $910.88

MD16‐MW59R $910.88

MD16‐MW60R $910.88

MD16‐MW61 $910.88

MD16‐MW62R $910.88

MD16‐MW63 $910.88

MD16‐MW64 $910.88

MD16‐MW65 $910.88

MD16‐MW66 $910.88

MD16‐MW67 $910.88

MD16‐MW68 $910.88

MD16‐MW69 $910.88

MD16‐MW70R $910.88

MD16‐MW71R $910.88

MD16‐MW72 $910.88

MD16‐MW73 $910.88

MD16‐MW74 $910.88

MD16‐MW75R $910.88

MD16‐MW76 $910.88

MD16‐MW77 $910.88

M o n it o ri n g W e lls

DFSP Tampa, FL

MD16‐Q17 $910.88

MD16‐QTMW1R $910.88

MD16‐VA04 $910.88

MD16‐W‐1 $910.88

MD16‐W‐2 $910.88

MD16‐W‐3 $910.88

MD16‐W‐4R $910.88

$46,454.88Estimated Total