ATTACHMENT 6 - PERFORMANCE RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 897 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W81K0426RA011
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army Medical Command
About this file
This is a Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire for federal contract W81K04-26-R-A011, issued by the U.S. Army. The questionnaire is a template designed to evaluate contractor performance on past or current contracts to assess risk for future contract awards. Respondents are required to provide candid, factual, and accurate information about a contractor's performance history, as this data will be used in federal contract award decisions. Completed questionnaires must be submitted to Alexis V. Medrano (alexis.v.medrano.civ@army.mil) and Darlene Riley (darlene.m.riley.civ@army.mil) within a stated timeframe.
The questionnaire is divided into three parts. Part I requires the offeror to provide contract identification information, including contractor name, address, program identification, contract number, contract type, prime contractor name if applicable, contract award and completion dates, nature of contractual effort, and total contract value. Part II requires evaluation by a point of contact or respondent using four confidence rating levels—Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence—across five performance areas: compliance of products and services to specification requirements and workmanship standards; effectiveness of project management and subcontractor control; timeliness of performance; small business participation and subcontracting goal achievement; and commitment to customer satisfaction. Mandatory rationale statements must accompany each rating. The questionnaire also requests general comments, information on other relevant past efforts by the company, and identification of alternative information sources. Part III specifies submission procedures and includes respondent identification fields requiring organization name, title, telephone number, and email address.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W81K04-26-R-A011
ATTACHMENT 6 - PERFORMANCE RISK ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire.
Submit your completed questionnaire to Alexis V. Medrano, alexis.v.medrano.civ@army.mil, and Darlene Riley, darlene.m.riley.civ@army.mil within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To Be Completed By The Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division: _______________________________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________ Program Identification/Title: ______________________________________________ Contract Number: ____________________ Contract Type: ______________________ Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor’s name cited above): ___________________________ Contract Award Date: _____________ Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: _____________ Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: ___________________________ Total Contract Value: _______________________
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name/Title: ______________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________ E-mail Address: ___________________________________
PART II. EVALUATION (To Be Completed By Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: Rationale Is Required For Each Response
A. Compliance Of Products, Services, Documents, And Related Deliverables To Specification Requirements And Standards Of Good Workmanship
☐ Substantial Confidence ☐ Satisfactory Confidence ☐ Limited Confidence ☐ No Confidence
Rationale:
B. Effectiveness Of Project Management (To Include Use And Control Of Subcontractors).
☐ Substantial Confidence ☐ Satisfactory Confidence ☐ Limited Confidence ☐ No Confidence
Rationale:
C. Timeliness Of Performance For Services And Product Deliverables.
☐ Substantial Confidence ☐ Satisfactory Confidence ☐ Limited Confidence ☐ No Confidence
Rationale:
D. Small Business Participation/Subcontracting (Does The Contractor Meet The Small Businesses Goals Relative To Your Contract?)
☐ Substantial Confidence ☐ Satisfactory Confidence ☐ Limited Confidence ☐ No Confidence
Rationale:
E. Commitment To Customer Satisfaction And Business-Like Concern For Its Customers’ Interest
☐ Substantial Confidence ☐ Satisfactory Confidence ☐ Limited Confidence ☐ No Confidence
Rationale:
F. General Comments. Provide Any Other Relevant Performance Information.
Comments:
G. Other Information Sources. Please Provide The Following Information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, please provide:
Organization: __________________________________________________________ Name/Title: ______________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________ E-mail Address: ___________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please Provide The Following Information:
Organization: __________________________________________________________ Name/Title: ______________________________________ Telephone Number: _______________________________ E-mail Address: ___________________________________
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return the completed Questionnaire. Submit your completed questionnaire to Alexis V. Medrano, alexis.v.medrano.civ@army.mil, and Darlene Riley, darlene.m.riley.civ@army.mil.
Thank you for your assistance.
| ContractorCompany NameDivision: |
| Address: |
| Program IdentificationTitle: |
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Type: |
| if different from the contractors name cited above: |
| Contract Award Date: |
| Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: |
| Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: |
| Total Contract Value: |
| NameTitle: |
| Telephone Number: |
| Email Address: |
| Substantial Confidence: Off |
| Satisfactory Confidence: Off |
| Limited Confidence: Off |
| No Confidence: Off |
| Substantial Confidence_2: Off |
| Satisfactory Confidence_2: Off |
| Limited Confidence_2: Off |
| No Confidence_2: Off |
| Substantial Confidence_3: Off |
| Satisfactory Confidence_3: Off |
| Limited Confidence_3: Off |
| No Confidence_3: Off |
| Substantial Confidence_4: Off |
| Satisfactory Confidence_4: Off |
| Limited Confidence_4: Off |
| No Confidence_4: Off |
| Substantial Confidence_5: Off |
| Satisfactory Confidence_5: Off |
| Limited Confidence_5: Off |
| No Confidence_5: Off |
| Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company: Off |
| Organization: |
| NameTitle_2: |
| Telephone Number_2: |
| Email Address_2: |
| Organization_2: |
| NameTitle_3: |
| Telephone Number_3: |
| Email Address_3: |
| Text1: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .