Attachment 6 - Past performance questionnaire - youth sports officials.pdf

PDF 405 KB Posted

Attached to
Fy26 Youth Sports officials and Scorekeepers
Solicitation number
FA500025Q5000
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the 673d Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces Command for a Youth Sports Officials and Scorekeeper's Program procurement at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska. The questionnaire is sent to organizations with direct experience with potential contractor offerors to solicit feedback on their past performance. Responses are due no later than March 18, 2026, and will be used to evaluate offeror capability to perform on the proposed effort. The completed questionnaire becomes part of the official source selection records and should be submitted electronically to rex.edades@us.af.mil, alexander.tate@us.af.mil, or Brian.Gitau@us.af.mil, with questions directed to A1C Alexander Tate at 907-552-5731.

The questionnaire is organized into four primary sections: Contract Identification (requesting contractor company information, contract number, type, program title, period of performance, and dollar value); Customer or Agency Identification (requesting information about the customer organization and geographic scope of work); Respondent Identification (requesting contact information and tenure of the person providing the assessment); and Performance Information (requesting detailed ratings on eight technical and management performance factors using a five-point scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with supporting narrative required for each rating). Additional questions address personnel management, responsiveness to changes, timeline adherence, communication effectiveness, deficiency correction, problem resolution, and overall contractor performance. The questionnaire also requests yes/no responses regarding cure or show cause notices, likelihood of future contract award, and compliance with Small Business Subcontracting Plan and Small Business Concern utilization clauses if applicable to government contracts.

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment 1: Past Performance Questionnaire – youth sports Officals

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 1 of 6

The 673d Contracting squadron of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Youth Sports officials and scorekeeper’s program. The Air Force is looking for a contractor to provide the expertise and management necessary to conduct officiatiung services for a youth military sports program at Joint base Elmendorf-richardson Alaska.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 18 March 2026. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to: rex.edades@us.af.mil; alexander.tate@us.af.mil and Brian.Gitau@us.af.mil. Please call A1C Alexander tate at 907-552-5731 for any questions or concerns. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Brian N. Gitau, SrA,USAF Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 2 of 6

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 1596254418A Inserted Text d

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 3 of 6

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 4 of 6

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Quality of Service/ Technical performance / management E V S M U N/A

1. How well did the contractor meet the technical requirements of the contract?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. How was the contractor ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

3. How well did the contractor respond to any outages, emergencies, or changes regarding the contract?

4. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet timelines/deadlines?

5. how would you rate the contractor’s ability to effectively communicate with you regarding all aspects of the contract?.

6. How would you rate the contractor’s ability to correct deficiencies in timely manner?

7. How well did the contractor Provide timely resolution of contract discrepancies?

8. How would you rate the contractor’s initiative to solve problems?

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 5 of 6

Quality of Service/ Technical performance / management E V S M U N/A

9. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

11. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?

☐ Yes ☐ No

If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Controlled Unclassified Information Page 6 of 6

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

10480 Sijan Ave STE 242, JBER, AK, 99506-2501, United States.

E-Mail to:

rex.edades@us.af.mil alexander.tate@us.af.mil Brian.Gitau@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

2026-02-24T17:39:25-0900
GITAU.BRIAN.NGANGA.1596254418
Text3:
Text4:
Text5:
Text6:
Text7:
Text8:
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Text17:
Check Box18: Off
Check Box19: Off
Check Box20: Off
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Text23:
Text24:
Text25:
Text26:
Text27:
Text28:
Text29:
Text30:
Text31:
Text32:
Text33:
Text34:
Text35:
Text36:
Text37:
Text38:
Text39:
Text40:
Check Box43: Off
Check Box44: Off
Check Box45: Off
Check Box46: Off
Check Box47: Off
Check Box48: Off
Check Box49: Off
Check Box50: Off
Check Box51: Off
Check Box52: Off
Check Box53: Off
Check Box54: Off
Check Box55: Off
Check Box56: Off
Check Box57: Off
Check Box58: Off
Check Box59: Off
Check Box60: Off
Check Box61: Off
Check Box62: Off
Check Box63: Off
Check Box64: Off
Check Box65: Off
Check Box66: Off
Check Box67: Off
Check Box68: Off
Check Box69: Off
Check Box70: Off
Check Box71: Off
Check Box72: Off
Check Box73: Off
Check Box74: Off
Check Box75: Off
Check Box76: Off
Check Box77: Off
Check Box78: Off
Check Box79: Off
Check Box80: Off
Check Box81: Off
Check Box82: Off
Check Box83: Off
Check Box84: Off
Check Box85: Off
Check Box86: Off
Check Box87: Off
Check Box88: Off
Check Box89: Off
Check Box90: Off
Check Box91: Off
Check Box92: Off
Check Box93: Off
Check Box94: Off
Check Box95: Off
Check Box96: Off
Check Box97: Off
Check Box98: Off
Check Box99: Off
Check Box100: Off
Check Box101: Off
Check Box102: Off
Check Box103: Off
Check Box104: Off
Text105:
Text106:
Date108_af_date:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .