Attachment 6 - AF 813.pdf

AF FORM 813, 19990901 (EF-V1) Page 1 of 2THIS FORM CONSOLIDATES AF FORMS 813 AND 814.

PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF BOTH FORMS ARE OBSOLETE.

REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function.

Continue on separate sheets as necessary and reference appropriate item number(s).

1. TO (Environmental Planning Function)

325 CES/CEIEC

2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol)

325 CES/CENP

2a. TELEPHONE NO.

850-283-2763

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

XLWU218120 Construct Honor Guard Facility

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (Identify decision to be made and need date)

The Purpose and Need For Action is attached. See Page 2.

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES (DOPAA) (Provide sufficient details for evaluation of the total action)

The Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives is attached. See Page 2.

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) Quentin Morales, GS-12

6a. SIGNATURE 6b. DATE 09 May 22

SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects) (+=positive effect; 0=no effect; - = adverse effect; U=unknown effect) + 0 - U

7. AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE USE ZONE/LAND USE (Noise, accident potential, encroachment, etc.)

8. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, attainment status, state implementation plan, etc.)

9. WATER RESOURCES (Quality, quantity, source, etc.)

10. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Asbestos/radiation/chemical exposure, explosives safety quantity distance, bird/wildlife aircraft hazard, etc.)

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, etc.)

12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, threatened or endangered species, etc.)

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Native American burial sites, archaeological, historical, etc.)

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, Installation Restoration Program, seismicity, etc.)

15. SOCIOECONOMIC (Employment/population projections, school and local fiscal impacts, etc.)

16. OTHER (Potential impacts not addressed above.)

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

17. PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CATEX) # ; ORA2.3.11

PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CATEX; FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.

18. REMARKS

ACAM Modeling completed, conformity determination not required

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION CERTIFICATION

(Name and Grade) Edwin Wallace, GS-12

19a. SIGNATURE 19b. DATE

MORALES-

PERRYMAN.QUENTIN.L.1090977500

Digitally signed by MORALES-

PERRYMAN.QUENTIN.L.1090977500

Date: 2022.05.09 20:24:59 -05'00'

WALLACE.EDWIN.

BLAIR.1047698347

Digitally signed by

WALLACE.EDWIN.BLAIR.1047698

Date: 2022.07.14 07:12:00 -05'00'

Construct Honor Guard Facility, AF Form 813 continuation sheet

4.0 Purpose and Need for Action:

The purpose of this proposed action is to construct a new facility to house the Base Honor Guard.

The action is needed because the Honor Guard was displaced from their previous facility (B1015) due to demolition driven by damage caused by Hurricane Michael and the Tyndall Recovery Master Plan. The Honor Guard is still a functioning entity at the base under the 325 FW managed by FSS and is authorized space per AFMAN 32-1084.

5.0 Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives (DOPAA):

The proposed action will be to construct a new facility approximately 3,250 SF. The facility will include administrative and maintenance services complete with associated utilities to include communications; electric; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; lightning protection; and fire protection/alarm system. Additional pavement to support training and to accommodate parking will be approximately 15,100 SF. Utilities will be run to the facility to include communications, electric, sewer, and water. Existing lines running beneath the site will be moved as needed to accommodate the facility. Digging and trenching is expected. Trenches will be 2 feet wide by 3 feet deep. All disturbed materials will remain on site. The estimated elevation of the site is 15-16 feet above sea level. Enough fill material will be brought in and placed on site to elevate the facility to the minimum 19-foot design flood elevation. Volume of fill is estimated at a maximum of 3,000 CY. Exterior paving and sidewalks, curbs, gutters, access drives, exterior lighting, grading, and physical security requirements are also included. Two locations were selected for potential stormwater ponds. Each pond would be approximately 3,000 SF. A comprehensive storm sewer system shall be designed to facilitate positive drainage of the facility and general site. The design shall be for a 10-year, 24-hour storm occurrence. All storm drainage system piping shall be reinforced concrete pipe. All gutters and downspouts shall connect to the storm sewer system.

Alternatives Considered:

A total of 7 sites were evaluated for feasibility. The other COAs proved to be unsuitable for various reasons such as noise concerns from the Honor Guard mission, incompatible surrounding uses, locations being within ERP sites, or conflicts with other Tyndall Rebuild activities.

The additional sites considered were: Undeveloped lot North of Sabre Dr., South of Road 31B, and West of Road 31; Undeveloped Lot North of Beacon Beach Rd between AFNORTH and Education Center; Undeveloped Lot North of Beacon Beach Rd and North of Education Center;

Undeveloped Lot South of Beacon Beach Rd and West of Archer’s Range; Undeveloped Lot South of Beacon Beach Rd and East of Archer’s Range; Undeveloped lot North of Mississippi Rd and West of Score Booth (Building #1126); Undeveloped lot North of Mississippi Rd and West of Pest Management (Building #1701).

No Action Alternative: Status Quo. If the facility is not constructed, the Honor Guard will be without a home to perform its functions. This would lead to a degradation of services.

5.1 Anticipated Environmental Issues:

5.2 Environmental Impacts:

ACUIZ/ Noise:

The proposed actions would result in a localized and temporary increase in noise levels due to construction and site preparation. This noise is not expected to be significant. The proposed action would not significantly contribute to the noise levels in the area.

Air Quality:

Tyndall AFB is in an attainment area for National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The FESOP permit for Tyndall AFB will not be violated by the implementation of the proposed project.

Temporary minor exhaust emissions would occur in the immediate vicinity of the construction.

Fugitive dust would be controlled at the sites using best management practices (BMPs), such as periodic watering of cleared areas and stockpiled materials and mulching or vegetative cover for the cleared areas.

Many operations are subject to specific air quality regulations. State-specific emission standards are identified in Chapter 62-296 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). Florida regulates hazardous air pollutants (HAP) in accordance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Part 61 is regulation by HAP and Part 63 is regulation by industrial category. There are also federal New Source Performance Standards specified for criteria air pollutants in Title 40, Part 60 of the

CFR.

Permits are required for operations subject to applicable regulations or that emit air pollutants in sufficient quantities to warrant regulation. Projects utilizing regulated equipment are required to obtain permits prior to beginning construction on new emissions units, modifying an existing emissions unit or installing air pollution control equipment. These permits will specify applicable emissions standards and work practices to control the emissions of pollutants such as particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, volatile organic compounds, and hazardous air pollutants.

Conduct a thorough site/plan survey to identify all activities that generate and/or control air emissions. Air permitting requirements are specified in Chapters 62-4, 62-204, 62-210, and 62- 212 of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).

Contractor performing the work is responsible for obtaining the permit. Permit application must be submitted to 325 CES/CEIE for review. Application must be signed by the 325 CES/CC.

ACAM Modeling was performed, based off the results the air quality in the area would not be significantly impacted by the proposed project; therefore a conformity determination is not required.

Water Resources:

Due to the cumulative area of proposed semi/impervious surface stormwater permitting and compensation through the FDEP will be required for the proposed project. All new semi/impervious surfaces must be accounted for when performing stormwater design each area must discharge into the stormwater management area.

If jurisdictional waters of the state or United States are proposed for impact, permitting will be required through the FDEP and/or USACE. Additional coordination with the 325 CES will be required.

Best management practices for erosion control shall be implemented prior to construction activities and maintained at all times during construction to prevent siltation and turbid discharges. Install erosion control measures along the perimeter of all work areas to prevent the displacement of fill material outside the work area into waters of the United States. Immediately after completion of the final grading of the land surface, all slopes, land surfaces, and filled areas shall be stabilized using appropriate vegetation, degradable mats, barriers, or a combination of similar stabilizing materials to prevent erosion. Methods could also include, but are not limited to the use of staked hay bales, staked filter cloth, sodding, seeding, and mulching; staged construction; and the installation of turbidity screens around the immediate project site. Identify and cover Stormwater structures using protection devices before performing any work. Devices must remain in place until all work is complete and the area has been cleaned and free of construction potential discharges. The erosion control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all work is completed and the work areas are stabilized.

There shall be no work, storage, or stockpiling of tools, materials (i.e. lumber, pilings, debris) within wetlands, ditches, swales, or elsewhere within waters of the state unless authorized by permit. All stormwater conveyance structures shall remain in operable condition and shall not be allowed to deteriorate or otherwise contribute to a water quality violation. Construction activities shall be conducted in a manner that does not cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards.

An FDEP permit maybe required for the installation, maintenance, repair, and removal of underground utility lines, cable, conduit, or pipeline transmitting electricity, communication signals, potable water, raw water, reclaimed water, domestic wastewater, propane gas or natural gas. 62-330.453 within the Florida Administrative Code dictates that a General Permit is needed for Installation, Maintenance, Repair, and Removal of Utility Lines that cross a regulated surface of the state. In this case the ditches/swales maybe considered a regulated surface water.

All electric, gas, water, sewer, and other services lines should be shut off, capped, or otherwise properly controlled, at or outside the building before demolition work is started. In each case, any utility company that is involved should be notified in advance, and its approval or services, if necessary, shall be obtained. Coordinate with the 325 CES/CEIC, GCEC, and Bioenvironmental regarding flushing and water quality sampling prior to and after performing any work.

If it is necessary to maintain any power, water, sewer, or other utilities during demolition, such lines shall be temporarily relocated as necessary and/or protected. The location of all power sources should also be determined, as they can prove especially hazardous during any machine demolition. All workers should be informed of the location of any existing or relocated utility service. Coordinate with the 325 CES/CEIC, GCEC, and Bioenvironmental regarding flushing and water quality sampling prior to and after performing any work.

All material used as fill shall be clean sand/fill dirt/shell material and shall not be contaminated with vegetation, garbage, trash, tires, hazardous waste, or other materials that are not suitable for construction.

A Construction Generic Permit (CGP)/Notice of Intent (NOI) will be required from the FDEP. Any act or process of developing or improving land, including demolition and renovation activity, which involves the disturbance of soils not limited to, clearing, grading, and excavation that reaches an acre of total disturbed area would require the CGP. This permit is different than an ERP. This permit does include dewatering. If dewatering is needed, please coordinate with the 325 CES/CEIEC, additional permits maybe required.

UFC 3-201-01 – Civil Engineering provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. This UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate.

Section 3-3.2 – Erosion and Sediment Control states “Design erosion and sediment controls that minimize the discharge of pollutants from earth disturbing activities in conformance with the applicable requirements of the regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the Installation regarding erosion and sediment control. Where requirements do not exist, provide an erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the requirements of Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Construction General Permit.”

This project will require a completed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)/EPA standards. Please provide a SWPPP for review, prior to CGP submittal. The FDEP has generated a template to be used (https://floridadep.gov/sites/default/files/ConstructionSWPPP.pdf). Work specific Best Management Practices (BMP’s) shall be implemented prior to construction activities and maintained at all times during construction to prevent siltation and turbid discharges. Identify and cover Stormwater structures using protection devices before performing any work. The BMP’s are to be installed along the perimeter of all work areas to prevent the displacement of fill material outside the work area into surface waters, stormwater inlets, etc. Immediately after completion of the final grading of the land surface, all slopes, land surfaces, and filled areas shall be stabilized using approved sod, seeding, degradable mats, staked hay bales, staked filter cloth, barriers, turbidity screens, or a combination of similar stabilizing materials to prevent erosion.

The erosion control measures shall remain in place and be maintained until all authorized work is completed and the work areas are stabilized and verified by USAF personnel.

All permit applications must be reviewed by CEIEC and signed by the 325th CES Commander prior to submittal. All costs associated with permits will be paid for by the contractor. All costs associated with any environmental sampling will be paid for by the contractor. It is the contractor’s responsibility to verify with all necessary regulatory agencies if any permits are required and/or provide written concurrence from the necessary agencies that no permits would be required prior to starting work, unless a viable regulation is noted detailing the activity would not require prior authorization and is agreed upon by the 325 CES/CEIEC.

Soil Impact:

Soil disturbances in the area will be substantial, contractor is responsible for applying for permits and properly managing unused soil. The project area is not within an area of contamination.

Any excess excavated soil/sand must be applied to the excavation site but it must not create mounding or any elevation changes from the design. Otherwise, it must be moved to the appropriate soil stockpile as directed by the government.

If fill soil is needed, it must be certified clean IAW Non-ERP Soil Guidelines Section #3.

Biological Resources:

The proposed action would not impact Biological resources Proposed action is not sited in 100-year floodplain/wetlands.

Cultural Resources Impact:

The proposed undertakings has been coordinated with the State Historical Preservation Office and a finding of no adverse effect has been received. Tyndall AFB recommends that the undertaking will have no adverse effects on properties eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Tyndall will halt all ground disturbing activities and initiate consultation with your office if archaeological deposits or human remains are encountered during the undertaking.

Hazardous Materials:

A letter of review from 325 CES/CEIEC Hazardous Materials Office must be accomplished prior to commencement of work.

The contractor shall submit TAFB Form 81 (Contractor Questionnaire) and TAFB Form 82 (Chemical Inventory) if applicable (within 10 duty days after the Notice to Proceed is issued), for review. The Contractor should note that Tyndall AFB is required to report chemicals used such as (but not limited to) compressed gases, adhesives, aerosol cans, sealants, paints, lubricants, oils, cleaners, degreasers, pesticides, Fuels. Copies of manufacturer-specific Safety Data Sheets (SDS) must be attached to TAFB Form 82. These SDSs shall also be readily accessible at the location of each hazardous material. After submission, 325 CES/CEIE will notify the Project Manager and/or CONS of the reportable chemicals and of any special instructions. As directed by the CO, the Contractor is required to submit TAFB Form 83 (Reporting Entry Form) showing material usage monthly until completion of the task order. The CO must be notified of any changes from the original submittal (i.e. new chemical is added, size of container or unit of issue changes or if the manufacturer changes), changes must be submitted using TAFB form 82. An updated letter of review indicating changes will be sent from CEIEC to the Contracting Office before the material can be brought onto the installation. Prime contractors shall be responsible to ensure all sub-contractors comply with this process. No materials should be brought onto the installation until a hazardous materials authorization letter has been received by the 325 CES/CEIEC hazardous materials office.

Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Contractors should perform work consistent with the policy and objectives identified in the installations Environmental Management Systems in accordance with AFI 32-7001, Environmental Management. Perform work in a manner that conforms to objectives and targets of environmental programs and operational controls identified by the EMS. Provide monitoring and measurement information as necessary to address environmental performance relative to environmental, energy, and transportation management goals. In the event of an EMS nonconformance or environmental noncompliance associated with the contracted services, tasks, or actions occurred, take corrective and preventative actions. In addition, employees must be aware of their roles and responsibilities under the installation EMS and of how these EMS roles and responsibilities affect work performed under the contract. Coordinate training needs associated with environmental aspects and the EMS, and arrange training or take other action to meet these needs. Provide training documentation to the Contracting Officer. Make EMS Awareness training completion certificates available to Government auditors during EMS audits and include the certificates in the Employee Training Records.

Hazardous Waste:

The Contractor shall identify, characterize, store and dispose of any hazardous waste generated during work in strict accordance with Federal and State guidelines found in the Code of Federal Regulations.

A Hazardous Waste Determination must be conducted/recorded and submitted to CEIEC for all wastes generated during the execution of this project IAW 40 CFR 262.11. A worksheet is attached to accomplish the requirement.

The personnel conducting Hazardous Waste Determinations and those individuals who may generate or manage Hazardous Waste must have annual Hazardous Waste Training that complies with 40 CFR 262.17(a)(7).

Any containerized waste must maintain compliance with EPA, DOT, and OSHA’s HAZCOM requirements.

Solid Waste:

The contractor and all subcontractors are responsible for disposal of all solid waste generated from the project. There should not be any solid waste placed in the dumpsters/roll offs located on Tyndall AFB unless the dumpster/roll off was provided by the contractor for use during the project.

Digging/Excavation:

Prior to any digging, an excavation permit will be required. An Air Force Form103, BCE Work Clearance Request, will be required. The AF Form 103 will not be signed by Environmental until all permits/SWPPP have been submitted.

5.3 List of required permits:

Permits will be required for the proposed action. Contractor is responsible to ensure all permits are submitted to the 325 Civil Engineer Squadron for review.

5.4 CATEX Statement:

The proposed project will not adversely impact Tyndall AFB environmental attributes; therefore, qualifies for Categorical Exclusions (CATEX) A2.3.11. Actions similar to other actions which have been determined to have an insignificant impact in a similar setting as established in an EIS or an EA resulting in a FONSI. The EPF must document application of this CATEX on AF Form 813, specifically identifying the previous Air Force approved environmental document which provides the basis for this determination.

The Environmental Assessment Hurricane Recovery and Installation Development, dated April 2020, is the Air Force approve document which form the basis for using this CATEX.

The construction project is in the same general area and the proposed actions are identical to those evaluated in the EA. 325 CES/CEIE has conducted an evaluation of subject EA to ensure the document is still valid in accordance with 32 CFR 989.20 (c). As part of the re-evaluation, CEIE personnel conducted an on-site survey and found that the affected environment and environmental consequences:

1. The methodology/analytical approach previously used is appropriate for the proposed action.

2. The direct and indirect impacts of the proposed action are not significantly different than those identified in the existing document.

3. The proposed action would not change the previous analysis of cumulative impacts.

4. Public involvement in the referenced analysis provides appropriate coverage for the proposed action.

5. There has been no significant change in circumstances or significant new information relevant to the proposed action.

PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHEET

Project Title: Construct Honor Guard Facility Project Description:

Project Number:

1. Natural Resources

Reviewed By: _____ewallace________________

Does project affect flora? YES _ ___ NO __X__ Does project affect fauna? YES ____ NO ___X_ Does project affect BASH? YES ____ NO __X__ Does project affect wildlife management area? YES ____ NO _X___ Does project affect forestry management area? YES ____ NO _X___

Does project affect erosion? YES ____ NO _X___

2. Threatened and Endangered Species Reviewed By: _____ewallace________________ _X_ Project has no potential for affecting threatened or endangered species or critical habitats.

__ Based on advice from USFWS or host nation liaison _____, threatened or endangered species in the vicinity of the project will not be affected.

__ Consultation with USFWS underway in accordance with the Endangered Species Act.

__ Formal Consultation with the Regional Director, USFWS completed on ______.

__ Biological Assessment is required. Estimated completion date completion date is ______.

__ Biological opinion issued by USFWS on ______.

3. Cultural Resources Reviewed By: _______ewallace______________ __ Properties affected by project are addresses in a programmatic Agreement that was fully executed with the State Historic Preservation Officer and the ACHP on ______.

__ Project area has not been surveyed for historic properties. Survey requirements are identified in the A-

106 system and the estimated completion date is ______.

_X _ Project area has been surveyed and no historic properties were identified; the State Historic

Preservation Officer was notified by letter dated 6/8/2022 _ __ Survey identified historic properties but the project will have no effect on them; written concurrence by the State Historic Preservation Officer is dated ______.

__ Consultation not required.

_ _ Project impacted archeological material. After consultation project can proceed with specific guidelines

__ Estimated sate to execute the MOA is _______ or no MOA was developed and the formal comments of the Council are being sought.

_X_Archeological Monitor not required.

__ Appropriate Native American Tribe or Group contacted on _______.

1. Wetlands

Reviewed By: ___ewallace__________________ _X_ Project is not sited in a wetland __ Requirements of EO11990 in progress. Estimated completion date is ______ __ Requirements of EO 11990 completed on ____.

__ Other

2. Flood Plain Reviewed By: ____ewallace_________________ _X_ Project is not sited in a 100-year flood plain.

__ Requirements of EO 11990 in progress. Estimated completion date is ______ _ _ Project is sited in a 100-year flood plain. Requirements of EO 11990 completed on ______ Finding of "No Practicable Alternative signed 18 April 2001______

3. Potentially Regulated Substances

Reviewed By: __ewallace___________________

a. Water:

__ Construction permit required for extension of water system per 62.555, FAC.

_X_ No permit required because less than 2 in. diameter pipe and less than 100 if extension.

__ Backflow preventer(s) required. Must be field tested by licensed inspector upon installation.

__ Sprinkler system must have rain sensor device per FS 373.62.

__Well drilling/mod/abandonment must be conducted by a licensed contractor. Permit required per 4OC-3, FAC.

__ Other: No water required for this project.

b. Wastewater:

__ Construction permit required to connect to collection system per 62-600, FAC.

_X_ No permit required per 62-604.1 10 (single facility, gravity service connection, no pretreatment, compatible discharge) __ Other: No Wastewater required for this project.

c. Stormwater:

_X_ Environmental Resource Permit required from: __FDEP_____________

a. Creates more than 4,000 s.f. impervious surface subject to vehicular traffic;

b. Creates more than 5,000 s.f impervious surface; or

c. Project affects 5 acres or more (includes recreation areas, golf course, ball fields, etc.)

__ Site included in station stormwater master plan; permit required but may access existing stormwater treatment system. (Basin no. __________ pond no._________ ; approx ________________ s.f.)

__ NPDES 1-acre site; construction contractor must obtain permit and implement Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.

_X_ SWPPP/CGP required.

__ Upon completion site will be included in Base Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.

_ _ Other:

d. Asbestos:

_X_ Not present: _________ survey underway.

__ Present, must be abated prior to demolition

e. Lead Based Paint:

_X Not present: _________ survey underway.

__ Present

f. Ozone Depicting Substances:

_X_ Not present: _________ survey underway.

__ Present (describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary).

g. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs):

X__ Not present: _________ survey underway.

__ Present (describe mitigation, or state why mitigation is not necessary).

h. Other known hazardous or toxic substances and pollutants (e.g. contaminated soils):

_X Not present: _________ survey underway.

__ Present (guidelines attached).

4. Hazardous Materials _X__ Will chemicals (such as, but not limited to, compressed gases, adhesives, aerosol cans, sealants, paints, lubricants, solvents, oils, cleaners, degreasers and pesticides) be used ____ Submit TAFB Form 81 (Contractor Questionnaire) and TAFB Form 82 (Chemical Inventory) 7-10 days upon issuance of the notice to proceed and prior commencement of work on site.

____ Submit copies of manufacturer-specific Material Safety Data Sheets ____ Submit TAFB Form 83 (Reporting Entry Form) at the end of the project or as indicated by CEV.

____ Notify CEV if anything changes from the original submittal (i.e. new chemical is added, size of container or unit of issue changes or if the manufacturer changes).

_ _ Will not use chemicals

5. Air Pollutants

Reviewed By: _____________________

__ Will not be generated by the operation or construction of this facility.

__ Will be generated by the operation or construction of this facility. Describe type and amount of substance expected to be generated, existing control systems, and the need for additional controls.

X__ Conformity determination not required.

__ Conformity determination required.

6. Solid and Hazardous Wastes

Reviewed By: _______________________

X _Facility will not be used for generating/managing solid and/or hazardous wastes.

__ Facility will be for generating/managing solid and/or hazardous waste.

_Yes Will the work being performed on the project generate any wastes?

7. Storage Tanks (Check all that apply)

Reviewed By: _____________________

_X_ No storage tanks are involved.

__ New storage tanks will be installed.

__ Material to be stored, quantity ____________.

__ Existing tanks on the project will be removed. Ensure regulatory agency has been notified.

__ Contamination exists.

__ Contamination unknown.

__ Existing tanks on projects it will be retained.

1. Environmental Impact Analysis Process

_X_ Categorical exclusion number _A2.3.11 applies.

__ Environmental Assessment under preparation. Expected completion date is __________.

__ Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact signed on __________.

__ Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under preparation. Expected completion date is ________. __ Draft EIS filed on ___________.

__ Final EIS filed on ___________.

__ Record of Decision signed on __________.

__ Foreign nation or protected global resource exemption number ___________ applies.

__ Environmental study (or review underway) under preparation. Expected completion date is __ Environmental study (or review) completed on ___________.

2. Interagency and Intergovernmental Coordination for Environmental Planning

Reviewed By: _______ewallace______________ X__ Coordination of proposed project with the state Single Point of Contact or other agencies is not required.

__ Coordination with the state Single Point of Contact is in progress. Expected date of completion is __ Proposed project was coordinated with the state Single Point of Contact or other agencies on _

3. Environmental Permits

Reviewed By: ____ewallace_________________ _ No permits are required unless dewatering is needed.

__ No permits required but regulatory agency notification required prior to construction (e.g.

underground storage tank removals).

_X_ Permits are required for this project.

1. Environmental Restoration Program (ERP)/Petroleum Contamination (PCA)

_X_ Facility is not sited on or near an ERP/PCA site.

__ Facility is sited near an ERP/PCA site.

__ Facility is within the boundary of an IRP/PCA site.

__ The following activities must be coordinated with the IRP Manager:

excavation, sampling, and 40 hour H&S training.

__ The site is projected to be remediated and/or closed out on _________, prior to commencement of construction activities.

__ The nature of the site contamination does not preclude the type of construction activity proposed.

__ There is a Compliance Agreement associated with this site.

__ A Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study was completed on _______ to accurately delineate the aerial extent of the contamination.

14. Comments

256 SF

BREAK

80 SF

FLIGHT

NCOIC

120 SF

FLIGHT

CHIEF

61 SF

LOCKER

61 SF

LOCKER

209 SF

BATHROOM

209 SF

BATHROOM

SF

DRILL

AND

TRAINING

102 SF

CASKET

STORAGE

58 SF

WEAPONS

STORAGE

102 SF

UNIT

LOCKERS

58 SF

CLOTHES

STORAGE

53 SF

MECH

64 SF

WS1

64 SF

WS3

64 SF

WS2

46 SF

COMM

41 SF

ELEC

64 SF

WS5

64 SF

WS4

309 SF

CORRIDOR

STAGE

12' - 0"

HEARSE

VAN

VAN

ADA SPACE

DUMPSTER/

MECH

SF

EXTERIOR

PRACTICE

AREA

SF

PARKING

JM

O

N D

O 5/

6/

:5 3:

P

M1/16" = 1'-0"

HONOR GUARD FL PLAN

ROOM AREA SCHEDULE

Name Area Number

BATHROOM 209 SF 6

BATHROOM 209 SF 7

BREAK 256 SF 1

CASKET STORAGE 102 SF 9

CLOTHES STORAGE 58 SF 12

COMM 46 SF 21

CORRIDOR 309 SF 18

DRILL AND TRAINING 1149 SF 8

ELEC 41 SF 22

EXTERIOR PRACTICE AREA 4732 SF 26

FLIGHT CHIEF 120 SF 3

FLIGHT NCOIC 80 SF 2

LOCKER 61 SF 4

LOCKER 61 SF 5

MECH 53 SF 15

PARKING 8192 SF 27

UNIT LOCKERS 102 SF 11

WEAPONS STORAGE 58 SF 10

WS1 64 SF 16

WS2 64 SF 20

WS3 64 SF 17

WS4 64 SF 25

WS5 64 SF 24

16156 SF

BUILDING FOOT PRINT 3610 SF

1 1/2" / 1'-0"1 1/

2"

1' -0

1/ 2"

1'

-0

1 1/2" / 1'-0"

STORM WATER POND OPTION

3000 SF

STORM

WATER

POND

OPTION

3000 SF

HEARSE

VAN

VAN

ADA SPACE

DUMPSTER/

MECH

PRACTICE

AREA

144' - 0"

8'

WETLAND LIMITS

8" WATER

8" FORCE

MAIN(S)

EXISTING

FENCE

JM

O

N D

O 5/

6/

:5 4:

P

M

1" = 30'-0"

SITE PLAN

JM

O

N D

O 5/

6/

:5 3:

P

M

{3D}

AIR CONFORMITY APPLICABILITY MODEL REPORT

RECORD OF AIR ANALYSIS (ROAA)

1. General Information: The Air Force’s Air Conformity Applicability Model (ACAM) was used to perform an analysis to assess the potential air quality impact/s associated with the action in accordance with the Air Force Instruction 32-7040, Air Quality Compliance And Resource Management; the Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP, 32 CFR 989); and the General Conformity Rule (GCR, 40 CFR 93 Subpart B). This report provides a summary of the ACAM analysis.

a. Action Location:

Base: TYNDALL AFB State: Florida County(s): Bay Regulatory Area(s): NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

b. Action Title: Construct Honor guard Facility

c. Project Number/s (if applicable):

d. Projected Action Start Date: 5 / 2023

e. Action Description:

The proposed action will be to construct a new facility approximately 3,250 SF. The facility will include administrative and maintenance services complete with associated utilities to include communications; electric;

heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; lightning protection; and fire protection/alarm system. Additional pavement to support training and to accommodate parking will be approximately 15,100 SF. Utilities will be run to the facility to include communications, electric, sewer, and water. Existing lines running beneath the site will be moved as needed to accommodate the facility. Digging and trenching is expected. Trenches will be 2 feet wide by 3 feet deep. All disturbed materials will remain on site. The estimated elevation of the site is 15-16 feet above sea level. Enough fill material will be brought in and placed on site to elevate the facility to the minimum 19-foot design flood elevation. Volume of fill is estimated at a maximum of 3,000 CY. Exterior paving and sidewalks, curbs, gutters, access drives, exterior lighting, grading, and physical security requirements are also included. Two locations were selected for potential stormwater ponds. Each pond would be approximately 3,000 SF. A comprehensive storm sewer system shall be designed to facilitate positive drainage of the facility and general site. The design shall be for a 10-year, 24-hour storm occurrence. All storm drainage system piping shall be reinforced concrete pipe. All gutters and downspouts shall connect to the storm sewer system.

Alternatives Considered:

A total of 7 sites were evaluated for feasibility. The other COAs proved to be unsuitable for various reasons such as noise concerns from the Honor Guard mission, incompatible surrounding uses, locations being within ERP sites, or conflicts with other Tyndall Rebuild activities.

The additional sites considered were: Undeveloped lot North of Sabre Dr., South of Road 31B, and West of

Road 31; Undeveloped Lot North of Beacon Beach Rd between AFNORTH and Education Center;

Undeveloped Lot North of Beacon Beach Rd and North of Education Center; Undeveloped Lot South of Beacon Beach Rd and West of Archer’s Range; Undeveloped Lot South of Beacon Beach Rd and East of Archer’s Range; Undeveloped lot North of Mississippi Rd and West of Score Booth (Building #1126);

Undeveloped lot North of Mississippi Rd and West of Pest Management (Building #1701).

No Action Alternative: Status Quo. If the facility is not constructed, the Honor Guard will be without a home to perform its functions. This would lead to a degradation of services.

f. Point of Contact:

Name: Edwin Wallace Title: GS-12/ Environmental Engineer Organization: 325 CES/CEIEC Email: edwin.wallace.1@us.af.mil Phone Number: 850-283-2714

2. Air Impact Analysis: Based on the attainment status at the action location, the requirements of the General Conformity Rule are:

_____ applicable __X__ not applicable

Total combined direct and indirect emissions associated with the action were estimated through ACAM on a calendar-year basis for the “worst-case” and “steady state” (net gain/loss upon action fully implemented) emissions.

“Air Quality Indicators” were used to provide an indication of the significance of potential impacts to air quality.

These air quality indicators are EPA General Conformity Rule (GCR) thresholds (de minimis levels) that are applied out of context to their intended use. Therefore, these indicators do not trigger a regulatory requirement; however, they provide a warning that the action is potentially significant. It is important to note that these indicators only provide a clue to the potential impacts to air quality.

Given the GCR de minimis threshold values are the maximum net change an action can acceptably emit in non-attainment and maintenance areas, these threshold values would also conservatively indicate an actions emissions within an attainment would also be acceptable. An air quality indicator value of 100 tons/yr is used based on the GCR de minimis threshold for the least severe non-attainment classification for all criteria pollutants (see 40 CFR 93.153). Therefore, the worst-case year emissions were compared against the GCR Indicator and are summarized below.

Analysis Summary:

Pollutant Action Emissions (ton/yr) AIR QUALITY INDICATOR

Threshold (ton/yr) Exceedance (Yes or No)

NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

VOC 0.585 100 No NOx 3.218 100 No CO 4.202 100 No SOx 0.010 100 No PM 10 1.963 100 No PM 2.5 0.132 100 No Pb 0.000 25 No NH3 0.002 100 No CO2e 972.1

Threshold (ton/yr) Exceedance (Yes or No)

NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

VOC 0.293 100 No NOx 1.609 100 No CO 2.101 100 No SOx 0.005 100 No PM 10 0.981 100 No

PM 2.5 0.066 100 No Pb 0.000 25 No NH3 0.001 100 No CO2e 486.0

2025 - (Steady State)

Threshold (ton/yr) Exceedance (Yes or No)

NOT IN A REGULATORY AREA

VOC 0.000 100 No NOx 0.000 100 No CO 0.000 100 No SOx 0.000 100 No PM 10 0.000 100 No PM 2.5 0.000 100 No Pb 0.000 25 No NH3 0.000 100 No CO2e 0.0

None of estimated emissions associated with this action are above the GCR indicators, indicating no significant impact to air quality; therefore, no further air assessment is needed.

Edwin Wallace, GS-12/ Environmental Engineer DATE

Cultural Resources Program

The Tyndall Cultural Resources

Program helps the base comply with the numerous laws and regulations that govern the preservation and management of archaeological sites, historic buildings, and historic cemeteries located on the base. The program reviews all construction projects conducted for Tyndall, and consults with six Native American tribes and the State of Florida on the effects of these undertakings. The program also surveys and documents the location of historic resources, monitors the condition of these properties, and provides training and educational outreach about their management and preservation.

TRAINING FOR

THE

INADVERTENT DISCOVERY

OF

CULTURAL RESOURCES

CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM

325th CIVIL ENGINEER SQUADRON

TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE

Archaeological sites on Tyndall Air

Force Base are protected from damage and destruction by the

Archaeological Resources Protection

Act, the American Antiquities Act, and many other laws and regulations.

Failure to stop work and report an inadvertent discovery is illegal, and can lead to a ban on base access, contract loss, fines, and jail time.

It’s the Law!

Discovered materials are often thousands of years old, and can be hard to recognize. Signs that you may have encountered an archaeological site include

An INADVERTENT DISCOVERY occurs when a project unearths evidence of past people or extinct animals. This evidence is called an

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE. Archaeological sites can be found anywhere on base, above and below the ground.

What is an

INADVERTENT DISCOVERY?

Will I discover an

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE?

How do I RECOGNIZE an inadvertent discovery?

What should I do if I

FIND something?

Tyndall is required by law to search for and docu-ment archaeological sites before any projects oc-cur. Projects are planned to avoid archaeological sites so discoveries are RARE.

A thick layer of shells may indicate an archaeological site.

The Cultural Resources Program will send an archaeologist to view the discovery, and determine if it requires documentation.

Work can often resume QUICKLY outside of a perimeter set by the archaeologist.

When can I RESUME work?

STOP all ground-disturbance and REPORT the discovery to your supervisor, contract representative, or unit commander. Your contact should immediately notify the Cultural Resources

Program of the discovery.

An example of an abrupt change in soil color.

Unusual or abrupt changes in soil color, especially to rich black soil.

Thick layers or scatters of seashells, angular rocks, or flat rock-like objects.

Layers or scatters of broken dishes, old bottles, or bricks.

Burned soil or ash.

Large timbers or cut wood.

Bones or teeth

Need to report a discovery?

Tyndall Cultural Resources Program Phone: 850-283-2713 Email: jose.cintron.1@us.af.mil

Need more information?

Inadvertent Discovery Training (website link pending)

Record of Hazardous Waste Determination for Solid Waste Disposal

A Hazardous Waste Determination (HWD) IAW 40 CFR 262.11 is required for all Solid Wastes. The 40 CFR 262.11 procedure can be summarized by answering these four questions.

Contract Name: _________________________________ Contract Number: ______________________

Company Name: ________________________________ Building Number: ______________________

Description of Waste being determined: __________________________________________________

1. Is this material a Solid Waste? Yes No

a. A Solid Waste is and material or waste that one decides to discard.

b. The physical state of the material is insignificant regarding the answer to whether a Solid Waste has been generated because the EPA has defined any material that the decision has been made to discard is a Solid Waste.

2. Is the material Exempt by EPA rule? Yes (Rule: ___________) No

a. The EPA has made many exemptions from the Hazardous Waste Regulations regarding specific wastes.

b. Recycling is an example of using EPA’s exceptions. The material in question and the manner in which it is recycled dictates what the rules that need to be followed. As indicated in Table 1 of 40 CFR 261.2, most materials are Solid Wastes even if they are recycled.

3. Is the Solid Waste listed by the EPA as a Hazardous Waste? Yes No

a. The EPA has created four lists that impose Hazardous Waste Disposal by any waste generated by the processes described on each of the lists.

b. The listed Hazardous Waste is as follows:

i. Waste from Non-Specific Sources (F List)

ii. Waste from Specific Sources (K List)

iii. Commercial Chemical Products that are Acutely Hazardous (P List)

iv. Commercial Chemical Products (U List)

4. Does the waste have any Hazardous Characteristics? Yes No

a. The EPA has created four characteristics that impose Hazardous Waste Disposal by any waste generated that exhibit the characteristics of Ignitability, Corrosively, Reactivity, or Toxicity.

i. The majority of Ignitable Hazardous Waste is those liquids that have a flash point of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit. Flammable Solids, Flammable Gases or Oxidizers are also ignitable characteristics.

ii. The Characteristic of Corrosivity (COC) is for aqueous liquids that have a pH of less than 2.0 or greater than 12.5. Liquids can also have the COC if the waste can corrode steel at a rate greater than one quarter inch per year.

iii. The Reactive Characteristic are those waste that would undergo a violent chemical reaction that may cause harm to human health or the environment.

iv. A waste has the Toxicity Characteristic when the results of a representative sample of the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) are greater than any chemical in 40 CFR 261.24 Table 1.

Waste Generator Signature Waste Generator Name (Print) Date

Contract Name:

Contract Number:

Company Name:

Building Number:

Description of Waste being determined:

Yes Rule:

Waste Generator Name Print:

Date:

Check Box3: Off

Check Box4: Off

Check Box5: Off

Check Box6: Off

Check Box7: Off

Check Box9: Off

Check Box10: Off

Check Box11: Off