Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire .pdf

PDF 274 KB Posted Nov 27, 2024

Attached to: Engineering Support for Electro-Optic and Infrared Measurements and Simulations
Solicitation number: N0017325RGG03
Issued by: Department of the Navy Secretary of the Navy Office of Naval Research

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Nov 27, 2024

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) form issued by the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) that must be completed and returned to gabrielle.l.giles.civ@us.navy.mil by December 30, 2024 at 1400 EST.

The form evaluates contractor performance across multiple areas including technical performance, schedule performance, cost control, and management performance using a five-tier rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory). Specific evaluation areas include product assurance, adherence to cost estimates, subcontract management, program management, responsiveness, quality, socioeconomic goals achievement, and management of key personnel. The form requires detailed comments and rationale for any Exceptional or Unsatisfactory ratings. It concludes with sections on termination history and a recommendation on whether the contractor should be considered for future awards. The form is marked as Source Selection Information and For Official Use Only.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
N0017325RGG03-A0001 - Conformed Copy.pdf	PDF	Dec 6, 2024
Solicitation Q-A_v2.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 6, 2024
N0017325RGG03-A0001 - SF30.pdf	PDF	Dec 6, 2024
Solicitation Q-A_v1.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2024
Attachment 6 - Cost Proposal Format.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Nov 27, 2024
Solicitation - N0017325RGG03.pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024
Attachment 2 - DD254.pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024
Exhibit A - CDRLs.pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024
Attachment 7 - Proposal Checklist .pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024
Attachment 3 - Requirements for On-Site Contractors.pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024
Attachment 4 - Personnel Qualifications.pdf	PDF	Nov 27, 2024

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

EXCEPTIONAL

MARGINAL

2. SUBCONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT TO

NRLINST 4200.15

INSTRUCTIONS: The Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) requests that you complete this questionnaire and provide your feedback to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor identified below. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, please do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: Gabrielle Giles; gabrielle.l.giles.civ@us.navy.mil no later than 1400 Eastern Standard Time, on 30 December 2024.

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. CONTRACTOR NAME

3. CONTRACT NUMBER

5. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

8. DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT (Use additional sheets as needed)

7. CURRENT CONTRACT COST/PRICE6. INITIAL CONTRACT COST/PRICE

4. CONTRACT TYPE

HQ-NRL 4335/2 (6-14)(Front) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104 -- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

II. RATINGS

RATING

UNSATISFACTORY

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance barely meets some of the contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective

III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

A. TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE: What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor's ability to meet the technical requirements?

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

N/AUNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

PRODUCT ASSURANCE - Assess the Contractor's technical performance in the following areas:

N/AUNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

B. SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE: Rate the Contractor's ability to deliver according to the agreed-to schedule. What were the causes of any schedule variances?

N/AUNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

N0017325RGG03

Attachment 5 - PPQ

N/A

D. MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE: What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor's management performance?

UNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

N/AUNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

COST PERFORMANCE

ADHERENCE TO THE ORIGINAL

COST ESTIMATE TARGETS?

DID THE CONTRACTOR CONTROL

SUBCONTRACTING COST?

DID THE CONTRACTOR OVERRUN

THE CONTRACT?

DID THE CONTRACTOR UNDERRUN

THE CONTRACT?

C. COST CONTROL: Rate the Contractor's effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost and provide reasons for changes to the contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes)

YES NO YES NOYES NOYES NO

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

N/A

ASSESS THE CONTRACTOR'S MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS:

UNSATISFACTORYMARGINALSATISFACTORYVERY GOODEXCEPTIONAL

RESPONSIVENESS - Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification.

QUALITY - Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality.

SOCIOECONOMIC GOALS - Ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB), Service- Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI).

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT - Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute.

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT - Timely award and management of subcontractors..

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT - Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan, to include timely award and management.

MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL - Performance in selecting, supporting and replacing - when necessary -key personnel.

COMMENTS (Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY) (Use additional sheets as needed)

E. TERMINATION HISTORY:

HQ-NRL 4335/2 (6-14)(Back) SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104 -- FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PREPARED BY

COMMENTS (Use additional sheets as needed)

F. RECOMMENDATION: Would you recommend selection of this company for future awards? Explain.

NAME/TITLE

SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED

ORGANIZATION E-MAIL ADDRESS

PHONE

CONVENIENCE

YES, I WOULD RECOMMEND THIS CONTRACTOR FOR

FUTURE AWARDS.

N/ADEFAULT

NO, I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CONTRACTOR

FOR FUTURE AWARDS.

(ext.)

1 CONTRACTOR NAME:

2 SUBCONTRACTORCONSULTANT TO:

3 CONTRACT NUMBER:

4 CONTRACT TYPE:

5 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

6 INITIAL CONTRACT COSTPRICE:

7 CURRENT CONTRACT COSTPRICE:

8 DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT Use additional sheets as needed:

EXCEPTIONALTECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

VERY GOODTECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

SATISFACTORYTECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

MARGINALTECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

UNSATISFACTORYTECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

NATECHNICAL PERFORMANCE:

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed:

EXCEPTIONALRow1:

VERY GOODRow1:

SATISFACTORYRow1:

MARGINALRow1:

UNSATISFACTORYRow1:

NARow1:

EXCEPTIONALRow2:

VERY GOODRow2:

SATISFACTORYRow2:

MARGINALRow2:

UNSATISFACTORYRow2:

NARow2:

EXCEPTIONALRow3:

VERY GOODRow3:

SATISFACTORYRow3:

MARGINALRow3:

UNSATISFACTORYRow3:

NARow3:

EXCEPTIONALRow4:

VERY GOODRow4:

SATISFACTORYRow4:

MARGINALRow4:

UNSATISFACTORYRow4:

NARow4:

EXCEPTIONALRow5:

VERY GOODRow5:

SATISFACTORYRow5:

MARGINALRow5:

UNSATISFACTORYRow5:

NARow5:

EXCEPTIONALRow6:

VERY GOODRow6:

SATISFACTORYRow6:

MARGINALRow6:

UNSATISFACTORYRow6:

NARow6:

EXCEPTIONALRow7:

VERY GOODRow7:

SATISFACTORYRow7:

MARGINALRow7:

UNSATISFACTORYRow7:

NARow7:

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed_2:

EXCEPTIONALSCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

VERY GOODSCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

SATISFACTORYSCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

MARGINALSCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

UNSATISFACTORYSCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

NASCHEDULE PERFORMANCE:

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed_3:

EXCEPTIONALCOST PERFORMANCE:

VERY GOODCOST PERFORMANCE:

SATISFACTORYCOST PERFORMANCE:

MARGINALCOST PERFORMANCE:

UNSATISFACTORYCOST PERFORMANCE:

NACOST PERFORMANCE:

COST ESTIMATE TARGETS: Off

THE CONTRACT: Off

THE CONTRACT_2: Off

SUBCONTRACTING COST: Off

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed_4:

EXCEPTIONALMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

VERY GOODMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

SATISFACTORYMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

MARGINALMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

UNSATISFACTORYMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

NAMANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE:

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed_5:

EXCEPTIONALRESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

VERY GOODRESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

SATISFACTORYRESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

MARGINALRESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

UNSATISFACTORYRESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

NARESPONSIVENESS Timeliness completeness and quality of problem identification:

EXCEPTIONALSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

VERY GOODSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

SATISFACTORYSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

MARGINALSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

UNSATISFACTORYSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

NASUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Timely award and management of subcontractors:

EXCEPTIONALPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

VERY GOODPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

SATISFACTORYPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

MARGINALPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

UNSATISFACTORYPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

NAPROGRAM MANAGEMENT Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute:

UNSATISFACTORYQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

NAQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

UNSATISFACTORYSOCIOECONOMIC GOALS Ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business SB Small Disadvantaged Business SDB WomenOwned Small Businesses WOSB Service Disabled VeteranOwned Small Business SDVOSB HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and UniversitiesMinority Institutions HBCUMI:

NASOCIOECONOMIC GOALS Ability to meet any applicable subcontracting goals for utilization of Small Business SB Small Disadvantaged Business SDB WomenOwned Small Businesses WOSB Service Disabled VeteranOwned Small Business SDVOSB HUBZone and Historically Black Colleges and UniversitiesMinority Institutions HBCUMI:

EXCEPTIONALSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

VERY GOODSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

SATISFACTORYSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

MARGINALSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

UNSATISFACTORYSUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

NASUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT Ability to meet the goals of the subcontracting plan to include timely award and management:

EXCEPTIONALMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

VERY GOODMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

SATISFACTORYMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

MARGINALMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

UNSATISFACTORYMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

NAMANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL Performance in selecting supporting and replacing when necessary key personnel:

COMMENTS Rationale must be provided for ratings of EXCEPTIONAL or UNSATISFACTORY Use additional sheets as needed_6:

CONVENIENCE: Off

DEFAULT: Off

NA: Off

YES I WOULD RECOMMEND THIS CONTRACTOR FOR: Off

NO I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND THIS CONTRACTOR: Off

COMMENTS Use additional sheets as needed:

NAMETITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

SIGNATURE:

DATE SIGNED:

EXCEPTIONALQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

VERY GOODQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

SATISFACTORYQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

MARGINALQUALITY Ability to provide a product or service that met your required level of quality:

EXT:

PHONE:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 27, 2024.