Attachment 5- Optional Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 112 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C26025R0074
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) construction project to renovate multiple buildings for mental health services. The solicitation (36C26025R0074) is a full and open, unrestricted construction project with an estimated value between $5M and $10M, specifically targeting renovations in Buildings 217A and 218A. The PPQ is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance across seven key areas: quality, schedule/timeliness, communication, management/personnel, cost/financial management, subcontract management, and overall performance. The form includes detailed rating scales from "Exceptional" to "Unsatisfactory" and provides space for clients to provide comprehensive feedback on a contractor's previous work, which will be used to assess their capability for the current mental health services renovation project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C26025R0074 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| P07 White City Wage Determination DBA.docx | DOCX document | |
| 692-22-105 217A and 218A Q_A revised.docx | DOCX document | |
| 23 25 00 HVAC WATER TREATMENT.pdf | ||
| 218 Hazardous materials.doc | DOC document | |
| 217 Hazardous materials.doc | DOC document | |
| 36C26025R0074 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 692-22-105 217A and 218A Q_A.docx | DOCX document | |
| 07 31 13.pdf | ||
| B217A site visit sign in 7.15.2025.pdf | ||
| 36C26025R0074 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2- Specifications 692-22-105 Renovate Spaces B217A and B218A for Mental Health Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3- Drawings 692-22-105 Renovate Spaces B217A and B218A for Mental Health Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1- SOW 692-22-105 Renovate Spaces B217A and B218A for Mental Health Services.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4- OR20250103 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| 36C26025R0074.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
VHA NETWORK CONTRACTING OFFICE 20 ● 1601 E. FOURTH PLAIN BLVD BLDG. 17, SUITE B428 ● VANCOUVER, WA
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
SECTION 1
CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3
1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.
IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.
2. CONTRACT INFORMATION
CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item.
if other:
CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.
AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.
FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.
EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.
SECTION 2
EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete
Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Regional Procurement Office-West (RPOW) Network Contracting Office 20 (NCO 20) is considering the offeror identified above for award of a construction project to renovate multiple buildings for mental health services.
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation. Please verify the accuracy of the information in Section 1 and complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. NCO 20 may contact you to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award. This form should be completed for the client for whom the offeror directly did work for.
Please return your completed questionnaire to the offeror to be incorporated into the offeror submission. PPQs should NOT be submitted directly to NCO 20 as a separate submission. Refer to the solicitation for submission due date.
EVALUATOR INFORMATION
NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.
POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.
ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.
PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.
DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.
*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:
1. QUALITY
| Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
| Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
3. COMMUNICATION
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes and responsiveness to client requests) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR
| Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project) |
| Choose an item. |
| Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract) |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
| Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments: |
6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Ability to manage subcontracting effort, including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance
Choose an item.
Comments:
7. SUMMARY
| Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below. |
| Choose an item. |
| Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| Choose an item. |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
| EVALUATOR SIGNATURE: |
| DATE: |
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
Rating Definition
| Exceptional |
| The offeror’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the client’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| The offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| The offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| The offeror’s performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the offeror has not yet identified corrective actions. The offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The offerors’ performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element of sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the offeror’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| The element or sub-element is not applicable to the contract for which performance is being rated. |
image1.tiff
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .