Attachment 5- NFATC QASP.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1031511078
- Issued by
-
Department of State
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for the Department of State's National Foreign Affairs Training Center (NFATC) Information Center Library Support Services contract. The QASP outlines the government's methodology for monitoring and evaluating contractor performance, establishing a structured approach to assess service quality through defined performance objectives, surveillance methods, and rating criteria. Key elements include performance rating definitions ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, with specific surveillance matrices for monitoring areas such as compensation reporting, billing/invoicing, time and attendance, and subcontracting plans.
The document details government roles and responsibilities, including the Program/Project Manager, Contracting Officer, and Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), who will conduct continuous technical oversight of contractor performance. The plan provides forms for Corrective Action Reports (CAR), Customer Complaint Records, and Performance Assessment Reports (PAR) to document and track contractor performance. While specific contract details are not fully completed (with placeholders like "TBD" for personnel), the QASP serves as a comprehensive framework for ensuring the contractor meets the required performance standards for library support services at the NFATC.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA Response PMO Library Support Services R2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0004.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0003.pdf | ||
| QA Response PMO Library Support Services R1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| QA Response PMO- Library Support Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Performance Work Statement NFATC Information Center r1.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 PastPerformanceQuestionnaireR1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Pricing Tables NFATC R1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Small Business Participation Commitment Document.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Work Statement NFATC Information Center.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Tables -NFATC.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Template for Vendor Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Table of Contents
| 1. | Purpose: | 2 |
| 2. | Authority | 2 |
| 3. | Government Roles and Responsibilities | 3 |
| 3.1. Program/Project Manager (PM) or Functional Services Manager (FSM) | 3 | |
| 3.2. Contracting Officer (CO) | 3 | |
| 3.3. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) | 4 | |
| 4. | Contractor Representatives | 4 |
| 4.1. Contractor Program Manager - <upon award, enter name> | 4 | |
| 4.2. Contractor Task Manager - <upon award, enter name> | 4 | |
| 4.3. Other Key Contractor Personnel - <upon award, enter name or delete these lines if not applicable> | 4 | |
| 5. | Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance | 5 |
| 5.1. Contract Surveillance | 5 | |
| 5.2. Surveillance Matrix | 5 | |
| 5.3. Performance Rating Definitions | 5 | |
| 6. | Performance Reporting | 6 |
| 6.1. Corrective Action Report (CAR) | 6 | |
| 6.2. Customer Complaint Form | 6 | |
| 6.3. Performance Assessment Report (PAR) | 6 | |
| Appendix 1 – Surveillance Matrix | 7 | |
| CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR) | 8 | |
| CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD | 9 | |
| PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR) | 10 |
Department of State – NFATC Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) NFATC Information Center Contract Number: TBD
Contract Description:
Contractor’s Name:
Purpose:
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a government-developed document used to determine if the contractor’s performance meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The QASP establishes procedures on how this assessment/inspection process will be conducted. It provides the detailed process for a continuous oversight process:
· What will be monitored
· How monitoring will take place
· Who will conduct the monitoring
· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented The contractor is responsible for implementing and delivering performance that meets contract standards using its Quality Control Plan. The QASP provides the structure for the government’s surveillance of the contractor’s performance and their Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) actions to assure they meet contract standards. It is the government’s responsibility to be objective, fair and consistent in evaluating contractor performance.
The QASP is not part of the contract nor is it intended to duplicate the contractor’s quality control plan. This QASP is a living document. Flexibility in the QASP is required to allow for an increase or decrease in the level of surveillance necessary based on contractor performance.
The government may provide a copy of the QASP to the contractor to facilitate open communication. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen or uncontrollable circumstances might occur that are outside the control of the contractor.
Bottom line, the QASP should ensure early identification and resolution of performance issues to minimize impact on mission performance.
Authority Authority for issuance of this QASP is provided under Part 46 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, Inspection of Services clauses, which provides for inspection, acceptance and documentation of the service called for in the contract or order. This acceptance is to be executed by the contracting officer or a duly authorized representative.
Government Roles and Responsibilities The following personnel shall oversee and coordinate surveillance activities:
Program/Project Manager (PM) or Functional Services Manager (FSM) The PM/FSM provides primary program oversight, nominates the contracting officer’s representative (COR), ensures the COR is trained before performing any COR duties and supports the COR’s performance assessment activities. While the PM/FSM may serve as a direct conduit to provide Government guidance and feedback to the Contractor on technical matters, they are not empowered to make any contractual commitments or any contract changes on the government’s behalf.
| Assigned PM/FSM: |
| TBD |
| Telephone: |
| TEXT |
| Organization/Agency: |
| TEXT |
| Email: |
| TEXT |
Contracting Officer (CO) The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also ensure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO shall also determine the final assessment of the contractor’s performance.
Additionally, the CO shall include a requirement in the quality assurance surveillance plan to revalidate all key personnel annually to determine whether the contractors meet the labor categories specified in the contract.
The CO shall maintain documentation in the contract files that demonstrates their review and approval of initial and replacement contractor employees in key personnel positions.
The CO shall include a requirement in information technology service contracts QASPs to review a sample of non‑key personnel quarterly to determine whether the contractor personnel meet the labor categories specified in the contract.
| Assigned CO: |
| TBD |
| Telephone: |
| TEXT |
| Organization/Agency: |
| TEXT |
| Email: |
| TEXT |
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) The COR is responsible for providing continuous technical oversight of the contractor’s performance. The COR uses the QASP to conduct the oversight/surveillance process. The COR shall keep a Quality Assurance file that accurately documents the contractor’s actual performance. The purpose is to ensure that the contractor meets the performance standards contained in the contract. The COR is responsible for reporting early identification of performance problems to the CO. The COR is required to provide an annual performance assessment to the CO which will be used in documenting past performance. The QASP is the primary tool for surveillance of the contractor’s quality program and help the COR to document contractor performance. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual change on the Government’s behalf.
| Assigned COR: |
| TBD |
| Telephone: |
| TEXT |
| Organization/Agency: |
| TEXT |
| Email: |
| TEXT |
Contractor Representatives The following employees of the contractor serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Task Manager for this contract. (Complete this section after the contract award) Contractor Program Manager - <upon award, enter name> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>
Contractor Task Manager - <upon award, enter name> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>
Other Key Contractor Personnel - <upon award, enter name or delete these lines if not applicable> Title: <enter title> Telephone: <enter number> Email: <enter address>
Performance Requirements and Method of Surveillance Contract Surveillance The goal of the QASP is to ensure that contractor performance is effectively monitored and documented. The COR’s contribution is their professional, non-adversarial relationships with the CO, PM and the contractor, which enables positive, open and timely communications. The foundation of this relationship is built upon objective, fair, and consistent COR evaluations of contractor performance against contract requirements. The COR uses the methods contained in this QASP to ensure the contractor is following contract requirements. The COR function is responsible for a wide range of surveillance requirements that effectively measure and evaluate the contractor’s performance. Additionally, this QASP is based on the premise that the contractor, not the government, is responsible for management and QC/QA actions to successfully meet the terms of the contract.
Surveillance Matrix The Surveillance Matrix (see sample at Attachment 1) is the list of performance objectives and standards that must be performed by the contractor. This matrix details the method of surveillance and frequency the COR will use to validate and inspect these performance elements. Inspection of each element will be documented in the COR file.
Performance objectives define the desired outcomes. Performance Standards define the level of service required under the contract to successfully meet the performance objective. The inspection methodology defines how, when, and what will be assessed in measuring performance. The Government performs surveillance, using this QASP, to determine the quality of the contractor’s performance as it relates to the performance element standards. The Performance Requirement Summary (PRS) should be used to form the foundation of the COR’s inspection checklist.
Performance Rating Definitions The performance ratings below reflect definitions at FAR 42.1503 Table 42-1. The COR will use these rating to evaluate the quality of contractor’s performance.
| PERFORMANCE RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Note 1: Plus or minus signs may be used to indicate an improving (+) or worsening (-) trend insufficient to change the evaluation status.
Note 2: N/A (not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation.
Performance Reporting Corrective Action Report (CAR) Describes how discrepancies are reported and resolved (see CAR below).
Customer Complaint Form See customer complaint form below.
Performance Assessment Report (PAR) See customer PAR page 11
Appendix 1 – Surveillance Matrix Inspection Methodology M1: Inspection of Reports. All reports shall be reviewed upon receipt. The reviewer will report any flaws in the document and categorize the flaws (Editorial, Format, and/or Substance).
| PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE |
| PWS REFERENCE |
| ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL) |
| METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE |
| Compensation and Recruiting |
| C.10.0 Compensation Plan |
Monthly report certifying status to the COR
| Accurate; Billing/Invoicing - When Submit Timesheets and Invoices Submitted On Time And Adequately Reviewed By Company For Submission; |
| C.7.1 Senior Contracting Specialist |
Monthly Time and Attendance to the COR
| Employees Participating in Retirement And Healthcare |
| C.10.0 Compensation Plan |
Monthly report to the COR
| Subcontracting Plan If Hiring Subcontractors – To Define If They Are Not Hiring Direct Employees; if hiring Consultants should provide a Discounted Rate/Unloaded rate |
| C.11.0 Subcontracting Management Plan |
Monthly report to the COR
HR Classification Specialist
HR Employee Relations Specialist
Senior Contracting Specialist
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT (CAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
1. CONTRACTOR
2. CONTRACT NUMBER
3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. FUNCTIONAL AREA
5. SUSPENSE DATE
6. CONTROL NUMBER
7. DEFICIENCY |_| MAJOR |_| MINOR
FINDING:
FINDING IMPACT:
Please respond with a written corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence by Suspense Date in Block 5. If date was not entered in Block 5, the contractor is not required to provide a response.
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR)
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
9. ISSUING AUTHORITY
TYPED NAME AND GRADE
SIGNATURE AND DATE
10. COR RESPONSE TO CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
11. COR DETERMINATION
|_| ACCEPTED |_| REJECTED
12. CLOSE DATE
| CUSTOMER COMPLAINT RECORD |
| DATE/TIME OF COMPLAINT |
SOURCE OF COMPLAINT
ORGANIZATION
BUILDING NUMBER
INDIVIDUAL
PHONE NUMBER
NATURE OF COMPLAINT
CONTRACT REFERENCE
VALIDATION
DATE/TIME CONTRACTOR INFORMED OF COMPLAINT
ACTION TAKEN BY CONTRACTOR
RECEIVED/VALIDATED BY
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)
(If more space is needed, use reverse and identify by number)
1. CONTRACT/TASK ORDER NUMBER
2. CONTRACTOR
3. TYPE OF SERVICES
4. QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL (COR) SIGNATURE AND DATE
5. COR PHONE
6. SUSPENSE DATE
I. PERFORMANCE
7. (CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY)
DEFICIENCY
NEW
REPEAT
NO DEFICIENCY NOTED
8. SERVICES SUMMARY or PWS PARAGRAPH ITEM REVIEWED
9. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY
(IF DEFICIENCY BOX WAS CHECKED)
10. DETAILED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
II. CONTRACTOR VALIDATION
11. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE
CONCUR NON-CONCUR
12. CORRECTIVE ACTION ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE
13. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PREVENTION OF RECURRENCE OR REASON FOR NON-CONCURRENCE OF COR CITED DEFICIENCY
III. ACTION CORRECTED
14. CONCUR NON-CONCUR COR SIGNATURE AND DATE
15. COR REMARKS (REQUIRED)
16. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE REMARKS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .