Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1031511078
- Issued by
-
Department of State
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of State Request for Quote (RFQ) 19FS1A25R0007, specifically for the National Foreign Affairs Training Center (NFATC) Information Center Library Support Services. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate potential contractors' past performance through a comprehensive rating system with four confidence levels: Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, and No Confidence.
The questionnaire requires detailed evaluation across multiple performance areas, including compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness, timeliness of deliverables, commitment to customer satisfaction, and general performance comments. Respondents are instructed to complete and return the questionnaire within 10 days to Jane Paek and Antonio Taylor at their state.gov email addresses. The evaluation is part of a competitive source selection process for a single award Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for library support services, with a performance period from September 29, 2025, through September 28, 2026, and potential option periods extending to September 28, 2030.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA Response PMO Library Support Services R2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0004.pdf | ||
| QA Response PMO Library Support Services R1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0003.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0002.pdf | ||
| QA Response PMO- Library Support Services.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Performance Work Statement NFATC Information Center r1.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007 A0001.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Pricing Tables NFATC R1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 PastPerformanceQuestionnaireR1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Template for Vendor Questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - Small Business Participation Commitment Document.docx | DOCX document | |
| Performance Work Statement NFATC Information Center.pdf | ||
| 19FS1A25R0007.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5- NFATC QASP.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Tables -NFATC.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire – Cover Letter
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Questionnaire in Support of Request for Quote (RFQ) 19FS1A25R0007
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The Department of State – Foreign Service Institute is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFQ. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and submit your completed questionnaire to Ms. Jane Paek at PaekJ@state.gov and Antonio Taylor at TaylorAM@state.gov no later than 10 days after receipt of questionnaire.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at PaekJ@state.gov.
Sincerely, Jane Paek Contracting Officer
Appendix D - Past Performance Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and/or notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title: A) Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is requested for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: _________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: _____________N/A_____________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): _______________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .