ATTACHMENT 4. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Hawaii Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912CN-23-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command

About this file

This document is a past performance evaluation questionnaire for federal contractors. It requests information about a contractor's performance on prior contracts within the past three years to assess past performance for award of a new federal contract. The questionnaire covers compliance with requirements and standards, project management effectiveness including use of subcontractors, timeliness of performance, cost estimation and control on cost reimbursement contracts, and commitment to customer satisfaction. It is to be completed by the contractor providing details of prior work and by a point of contact from the agency for that past work who will provide ratings and comments on the contractor's performance.

The related federal contract opportunity is a multiple award task order contract for services in Hawaii to be awarded by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command. Solicitation number is W912CN-23-R-0002 with an unspecified response due date. The contract type and required services or products are not specified in the information provided.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Hawaii, newest first.
File Type Posted
23-R-0002 P00003 SF 30 Final.pdf PDF
23-R-0002 P00003 Conformed Final.pdf PDF
23-R-0002 P00002 SF 30.pdf PDF
RFI Attachments.pdf PDF
23-R-0002 P00002 Conformed.pdf PDF
W912CN 23-R-0002 HI MATOC RFI Responses.pdf PDF
23-R-0002 P00001 Conformed.pdf PDF
23-R-0002 P00001 SF 30 Amendment 9.22.23.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 2.a. PROPOSAL COST BREAKDOWN INSTRUCTIONS (Sample project) rev.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2.b COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET (Sample Project).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ATTACHMENT 3 PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION.docx DOCX document
W912CN-23-R-0002 SF1442 FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - MATOC SAMPLE PROJECT.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 2.a. PROPOSAL COST BREAKDOWN INSTRUCTIONS (Sample project).docx DOCX document
Attachment 1 COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY SHEET PROPOSED RATES.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________

POC:________________________Title:________________________
(Name)(E.G. PCO/ACO/TM)

(Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Good

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Acceptable

· Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

· Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

_____________________________________________________
SignatureDate

Typed or Printed Name

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .