Attachment 3 - PPS_Template for Offerors AE IDIQ_2023.pdf

PDF 448 KB Posted

Attached to
BIL and F&E Funded - Architect and Engineer Services Recompete Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
697DCK-23-R-00584
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region

About this file

This document contains a past performance survey template for evaluation of architect and engineering firms for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract. The survey requests ratings and comments on 22 performance criteria including quality of work, project management, compliance with schedules, and customer satisfaction. It asks about timeliness of reporting, responsiveness, and whether the firm was proactive, suggested cost savings, and would be recommended. Additional questions address partial or full contract terminations, performance issues, and other comments. The related federal contract opportunity is a recompete for architect and engineer services with the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region solicitation number 697DCK-23-R-00584 for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY (PPS)

Architect and Engineering

IDIQ

RFO #

Page | 1

To: (Reference Name) (Reference Company Name) (Reference Phone) (Reference Email)

The Federal Aviation Administration is currently evaluating and you were listed as a performance reference. It would be greatly appreciated if you would take 5 minutes to complete the following information and respond via email to the AE firm at _____________________ and copy: larry.hill@faa.gov .

If you have any questions or comments please contact Mr. Larry Hill. Thanks for your assistance.

FAA New England Regional Office Attn: Larry Hill

1200 District Ave Burlington, MA 01803-5078

1. A/E Firm’s Name: 2. Contract Number:

3. A/E Firm Address: 4. Contract Type:

5. Your Company Name: 6. Your Company POC/Phone/Email

7. Period of Performance: 8. Dollar Amount of Award: $ Total Dollar Value with Mods:$

9. Title of Contract:

10. Description of Contract Service:

11. Type of Work:

Design Service Other mailto:larry.hill@faa.gov

IDIQ

RFO #

Page | 2

PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS USING THE RATINGS BELOW:

1-Unsatisfactory 2-Marginal 3-Satisfactory 4-Good 5-Outstanding NA-Not Applicable

Please provide a brief explanation for ratings of 3 and below.

1. How well did the A/E firm adhere to the Statement of Work?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

2. Did the firm follow good project management practices for your project?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

3. To what extent were the A/E firm’s documentation and/or submittals accurate and complete?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

4. How would you rate the A/E firm’s quality control program?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

5. How would you rate the quality of the design developed by the A/E firm?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

6. To what extent did the A/E firm respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

7. Did the A/E firm commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

8. How well did the A/E firm comply with the contract time of performance and critical schedule milestones?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

9. To what extent did the A/E firm submit the required reports and documentation on time?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY (PPS) Architect and Engineering

IDIQ

RFO #

Page | 3

10. Was the A/E firm Project Manager knowledgeable of best project management practices?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

11. How responsive do you think the A/E firm was to information requests, issues, or problems during the contract?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

12. Did the A/E firm take corrective action promptly when issues arose?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

13. Were any contract changes reasonably negotiated?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

14. Were accepted contract changes implemented promptly by the firm?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

15. How well did the firm manage any subcontractors?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

16. How well did the A/E firm coordinate work between all engineering disciplines participating in the design?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

17. To what extent were the firm’s employees experienced and qualified?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

18. How would you rate the level of responsiveness by the A/E firm personnel to project-related emails and/or calls?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

19. How well did the A/E firm manage design reviews?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

IDIQ

RFO #

Page | 4

20. How well did the A/E firm perform construction support services?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

21. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Owner’s staff?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

22. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction?

1 2 3 4 5 NA

Please Respond with Yes or No

23. Was the firm proactive?

Yes No

24. Did the firm suggest cost-saving changes?

Yes No

25. Would you recommend this A/E firm?

Yes No

Questions 26-30 (For Federal Contracts ONLY)

26. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?

Yes No 26a. If yes, please describe the reason and outcome.

27. Are there any pending terminations?

Yes No

28. What is/was the duration of the contract?

29. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work?

Yes No

29a. If yes, please describe the reason and outcome.

30. Please provide other comments:

Reference Signature: Date:

1 AE Firms Name:
3 AE Firm Address:
5 Your Company Name:
10 Description of Contract ServiceRow1:
11 Type of Work Design Service Other:
Design: Off
Service: Off
1 How well did the AE firm adhere to the Statement of WorkRow1:
undefined: Off
undefined_2: Off
undefined_3: Off
undefined_4: Off
5: Off
NA: Off
2 Did the firm follow good project management practices for your projectRow1:
undefined_5: Off
undefined_6: Off
undefined_7: Off
undefined_8: Off
5_2: Off
NA_2: Off
3 To what extent were the AE firms documentation andor submittals accurate and completeRow1:
undefined_9: Off
undefined_10: Off
undefined_11: Off
undefined_12: Off
5_3: Off
NA_3: Off
4 How would you rate the AE firms quality control programRow1:
undefined_13: Off
undefined_14: Off
undefined_15: Off
undefined_16: Off
5_4: Off
NA_4: Off
5 How would you rate the quality of the design developed by the AE firmRow1:
undefined_17: Off
undefined_18: Off
undefined_19: Off
undefined_20: Off
5_5: Off
NA_5: Off
6 To what extent did the AE firm respond positively and promptly to technical direction contract change orders etcRow1:
undefined_21: Off
undefined_22: Off
undefined_23: Off
undefined_24: Off
5_6: Off
NA_6: Off
7 Did the AE firm commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problemsRow1:
undefined_25: Off
undefined_26: Off
undefined_27: Off
undefined_28: Off
5_7: Off
NA_7: Off
8 How well did the AE firm comply with the contract time of performance and critical schedule milestonesRow1:
undefined_29: Off
undefined_30: Off
undefined_31: Off
undefined_32: Off
5_8: Off
NA_8: Off
9 To what extent did the AE firm submit the required reports and documentation on timeRow1:
undefined_33: Off
undefined_34: Off
undefined_35: Off
undefined_36: Off
5_9: Off
NA_9: Off
10 Was the AE firm Project Manager knowledgeable of best project management practicesRow1:
undefined_37: Off
undefined_38: Off
undefined_39: Off
undefined_40: Off
5_10: Off
NA_10: Off
1_10:
undefined_41: Off
2_11:
undefined_42: Off
undefined_43: Off
undefined_44: Off
undefined_45: Off
12 Did the AE firm take corrective action promptly when issues aroseRow1:
undefined_46: Off
undefined_47: Off
undefined_48: Off
undefined_49: Off
5_12: Off
NA_12: Off
13 Were any contract changes reasonably negotiatedRow1:
undefined_50: Off
undefined_51: Off
undefined_52: Off
undefined_53: Off
5_13: Off
NA_13: Off
14 Were accepted contract changes implemented promptly by the firmRow1:
undefined_54: Off
undefined_55: Off
undefined_56: Off
undefined_57: Off
5_14: Off
NA_14: Off
15 How well did the firm manage any subcontractorsRow1:
undefined_58: Off
undefined_59: Off
undefined_60: Off
undefined_61: Off
5_15: Off
NA_15: Off
16 How well did the AE firm coordinate work between all engineering disciplines participating in the designRow1:
undefined_62: Off
undefined_63: Off
undefined_64: Off
undefined_65: Off
5_16: Off
NA_16: Off
17 To what extent were the firms employees experienced and qualifiedRow1:
undefined_66: Off
undefined_67: Off
undefined_68: Off
undefined_69: Off
5_17: Off
NA_17: Off
18 How would you rate the level of responsiveness by the AE firm personnel to projectrelated emails andor callsRow1:
undefined_70: Off
undefined_71: Off
undefined_72: Off
undefined_73: Off
5_18: Off
NA_18: Off
19 How well did the AE firm manage design reviewsRow1:
undefined_74: Off
undefined_75: Off
undefined_76: Off
undefined_77: Off
5_19: Off
NA_19: Off
20 How well did the AE firm perform construction support servicesRow1:
undefined_78: Off
undefined_79: Off
undefined_80: Off
undefined_81: Off
5_20: Off
NA_20: Off
21 To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Owners staffRow1:
undefined_82: Off
undefined_83: Off
undefined_84: Off
undefined_85: Off
5_21: Off
NA_21: Off
22 What was your level of overall customer satisfactionRow1:
undefined_86: Off
undefined_87: Off
undefined_88: Off
undefined_89: Off
5_22: Off
NA_22: Off
Name:
Company Name:
Phone:
Email:
A/E Firm Name:
Contract #:
Contract Type:
POC/Phone/EMail:
Dollar Amount:
Value with Mods:
Contract Title:
Date:
23: Off
24: Off
25: Off
26: Off
25Y: Off
24Y: Off
23Y: Off
27Y: Off
27: Off
28Y: Off
26Y: Off
28: Off
28 What iswas the duration of the contract:
29A:
30:
AE Firm email:
7:
POP:

RFO #:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .