Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 127 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ICITAP/OPDAT Worldwide Support Services
- Solicitation number
- 15JPSS26R00000038
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the U.S. Department of Justice for source selection on a contract for worldwide support services to the Criminal Division's International Criminal Investigative Training Assistance Program (ICITAP) and Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT), under Solicitation Number 15JPSS26R00000038.
The questionnaire is designed to be completed by Government evaluators who have direct knowledge of an offeror's contract performance. The first section collects contractor information including company name and address, contract number, contract period and performance locations, contract value, contract type, contracting officer details, and a description of work performed. The evaluation section requires assessors to rate contractor performance across five key elements—Quality, Schedule, Cost Control, Management, and Regulatory Compliance—using a five-point scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) with narrative justification for each rating. Additionally, evaluators must provide an overall performance characterization and make a recommendation regarding the contractor's suitability for similar future contracts. The Government reserves the right to verify all information provided and contact evaluators for additional clarification. Completed questionnaires are to be returned directly to the offeror for inclusion in its proposal.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 2 - 15JPSS26R00000038.pdf | ||
| Sol. 15JPSS26R00000038.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions Answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Tables - Amendment 1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - Labor CLIN Descriptions Qualifications - Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| SF 33 for 15JPSS26R00000038.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions - Answers.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Sol. 15JPSS26R00000038.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Labor CLIN DescriptionsQualifications.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - DD Form 254 Contract Security Classification Specification.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Pricing Tables.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Vendor_Questions Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - ICITAP and OPDAT Presence Countries.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - DOJ Acquisition Policy Notices.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The U.S. Department of Justice is conducting a source selection for worldwide support services in support of the Criminal Division's International Criminal Investigative Training Assistance Program (ICITAP) and Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT). As part of the evaluation, the Government is assessing the quality of each Offeror's past performance.
Your responses will assist the Government in evaluating the contractor's performance on the referenced contract or task order.
In order to accurately evaluate the Offeror’s past performance, your assistance is requested in obtaining and verifying the past performance history of this Offeror.
The Offeror has completed the contractor information section of this questionnaire. Please complete the evaluation portion and return the completed questionnaire directly to the Offeror for inclusion in its proposal. The Government reserves the right to verify the information provided and to contact the evaluator if additional clarification is required.
SOLICITATION N.: 15JPSS26R00000038
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
NAME AND ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED:
CONTRACT NUMBER
CONTRACT PERIOD AND PLACE(S)
OF PERFORMANCE
CONTRACT VALUE CONTRACT TYPE
CONTRACTING OFFICER NAME,
AGENCY, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION OF WORK PERFORMED BY THE OFFEROR:
NAME OF EVALUATOR, COMPANY/AGENCY,
TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND EMAIL
ADDRESS
DATE EVALUATION PROVIDED
Instructions to the Evaluator: The Offeror has completed the contractor information section below. Please complete only the evaluation portion of this questionnaire based on your personal knowledge of the Offeror's performance under the referenced contract or task order. Please return the completed questionnaire to the Offeror.
Performance Element Select
Rating*:
E, VG, S,
M, U, NA
Narrative Supporting the Rating
1. QUALITY
Did the contractor consistently provide services meeting contract requirements?
2. SCHEDULE
Did the contractor meet required schedules?
3. COST CONTROL
Was work managed within negotiated cost?
4. MANAGEMENT
Did contractor management effectively communicate with the Government, respond promptly to issues, and successfully manage contract performance?
5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Did the contractor comply with applicable contract terms, reporting requirements, security requirements, and other contractual or regulatory obligations?
* Rating Definition E – Exceptional: Performance consistently exceeded contract requirements to the Government's benefit.
VG – Very Good: Performance exceeded some contract requirements and otherwise met all requirements.
S – Satisfactory: Performance met contract requirements.
M – Marginal: Performance did not consistently meet contract requirements; corrective action was required.
U – Unsatisfactory: Performance failed to meet contract requirements.
NA – Not Applicable: The evaluation element did not apply to the referenced contract or task order.
Overall Performance Based on your overall experience administering or overseeing this contract, how would you characterize the contractor's overall performance?
Would you recommend this contractor for contracts of similar scope, size, and complexity? Yes/No.
If No, please explain.
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| NAME AND ADDRESS OF COMPANY EVALUATED: |
| 3. COST CONTROL |
| 4. MANAGEMENT |
| 5. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .