Attachment 3. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx
DOCX document 53 KB Posted
- Attached to
- David Grant Medical Center's Audio Visual and System Upgrade (Simulation Center), Travis AFB CA
- Solicitation number
- FA442725Q1110
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the David Grant Medical Center (DGMC) Simulation Center Audio Visual System Upgrade project at Travis Air Force Base, California. The 60th Contracting Squadron is seeking performance ratings from previous customers of the potential contractor to evaluate their past performance, with the completed questionnaire due by 15 August 2025 at 12:00 PM PDT.
The PPQ requires detailed information about the contractor's previous contract performance, including contract details, performance ratings across six key areas (quality of service, on-time delivery, management, communication, contract adherence, and overall performance), and asks respondents to rate the contractor's performance on a scale of 1-5. The completed questionnaire will become part of the official source selection records, and respondents are asked to email the PDF to the Contract Specialist, Mr. Clark Teninty, with contact information provided for confirmation of receipt.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The 60th Contracting Squadron, Travis Air Force Base, CA is in the process of soliciting offers from companies capable of providing:
DGMC Simulation Center Audio Visual System Upgrade The contracting company eligible to submit a quotation for this requirement has identified you as their recent customer capable of providing performance ratings on similar requirements they have performed or currently performing for you, your business, or your organization.
In order for 60th Contracting Squadron to conduct its evaluation, we request that you complete the questionnaire below and email a PDF file to Mr. Clark Teninty, Contract Specialist (CS) at clark.teninty.1@us.af.mil. The due date for the submission of the completed questionnaire is: 15 Aug 2025 at 12:00 PM PDT. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.
To confirm receipt of your submitted PPQ, please contact Mr. Clark Teninty at the email previously provided or you can call 707-424-7737.
PLEASE FILL THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
A. OFFEROR’S INFORMATION: The contractor to whom who are completing this PPQ for.
Contractor Name:
Address:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Phone Number:
Email:
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Company/Organization:
Address:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Phone Number:
Email:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION: Please provide as much information as you can regarding the contract that the contracting company has performed or is still performing for you, your business, or your organization.
Contract Number/Name:
Contract Description:
Period of Performance:
Annual Contract Value:
Total Contract Value (For the full duration of the contract):
Contract performed as Prime Contractor or Subcontractor?
If Subcontractor, what percentage was performed?
D. PERFOMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Contracting Company’s performance. Please provide a narrative explanation for any ratings of 1, 2, or 5.
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
| The contractor is substantially failing or has substantially failed to meet the performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
| The contractor has shown some deficiencies in meeting the performance standards of our contractual agreement. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
| The contractor is meeting or has met the performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. |
| The contractor exceeds or has exceeded the minimum performance standards outlined in our contractual agreement. |
| The contractor substantially exceeds or has substantially exceeded performance expectations, resulting in significant positive impacts. (Provide explanation under Remarks) |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| QUALITY OF SERVICE |
| 2 |
| ON-TIME DELIVERY OF SERVICE |
| 3 |
| MANAGEMENT OF SERVICE |
| 4 |
| COMMUNICATION |
| 5 |
| CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITION ADHERANCE |
| 6 |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance |
| 7 |
| Was the Contractor ever issued a Corrective Actions Report (CAR) or other similar deficiently reports? |
| 8 |
| Would you award another contract to this Contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
Remarks
Signature:
Print Name:
Title:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .