Attachment 2 Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 173 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Joint Base Andrews Food Services (DFAC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA286026Q0003
About this file
This is a Food Service Past Performance Survey form designed to evaluate contractor performance on food service contracts. The survey collects general information about the contractor, including name, address, contact details, project title, contract number, dollar amount, and performance period. Respondents must identify their role (prime contractor, sub-contractor, or key personnel) and provide their name, title, and contact information in Section B.
Section C requires respondents to rate contractor performance on a 1-6 scale across 18 detailed performance criteria, including management capabilities, personnel hiring and retention, quality control implementation, problem identification and resolution, responsiveness to changes, supervision adequacy, payment of subcontractors/suppliers, cost proposal accuracy, and cooperation with government personnel. The form mandates narrative explanations for any ratings of 1 or 2 (no confidence or little confidence). Additionally, respondents must answer three yes/no questions regarding whether the contractor received a cure or show cause notice, whether they would award another contract to the contractor, and whether the contractor is rated in CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System). A remarks section provides space for additional comments. The survey notes that if an offeror holds multiple contracts with an agency within three years, separate evaluation forms must be completed for each contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOOD SERVICE PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ __________________________ Fax Number: ____________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ____________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: ___________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number:_____________________ _____________________________ Email Address:_____________________
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY
RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
1 2 3 4 5 6
NO CONFIDENCE LITTLE
CONFIDENCE
SATISFACTORY
CONFIDENCE
SIGNIFICANT
CONFIDENCE
HIGH
CONFIDENCE
UNKNOWN
CONFIDENCE
Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Normal contractor emphasis should preclude any problems.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has significant confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. i
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has high confidence the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.ii
No performance record is identifiable.iii
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER
The contractor:
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
1 2 3 4 5 6
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
1 2 3 4 5 6
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
1 2 3 4 5 6
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6
5. Followed approved quality control plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1 2 3 4 5 6
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
1 2 3 4 5 6
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. 1 2 3 4 5 6
9. Identified problems as they occurred. 1 2 3 4 5 6
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. 1 2 3 4 5 6
12. Was responsive to contract changes. 1 2 3 4 5 6
13. Provided adequate project supervision. 1 2 3 4 5 6
14. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
1 2 3 4 5 6
15. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. 1 2 3 4 5 6
16. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
1 2 3 4 5 6
17. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 6
18. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6
19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
21. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO
Remarks:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .