Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire_.docx
DOCX document 71 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Housekeeping Services
- Solicitation number
- 33310524R0003
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation 33310524R0003 for Housekeeping Services at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The questionnaire requests information on the offeror's past performance, including quality, schedule, cost control, management, regulatory compliance, and overall performance. Respondents are asked to rate the contractor's performance on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory and provide narrative explanations for any ratings of Exceptional, Very Good, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. The questionnaire is due by June 28, 2024. The related federal contract opportunity is for a competitive 8(a) set-aside procurement for full custodial services for the Kennedy Center's 423,000 square feet of space, including theaters, rehearsal areas, classrooms, and offices. The contract has a base period and four option years, with the goal of providing 24/7 housekeeping services year-round.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation 33310524R0003 Solicitation 33310524R0003
Solicitation 33310524R0003 Offeror Name: ___________________________________________________
THE CENTER CONTRACTOR EVALUATION PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts is currently procuring housekeeping services under Solicitation No. 33310524R0003. As a result, we are performing a past performance survey and reference investigation on potential contractors for the upcoming contract. The information contained herein is considered “Source Selection Information” in accordance with FAR 3.104. Therefore, it is asked that you treat it accordingly. While the results of the overall past performance survey may be discussed with the contractor, FAR 15.610 and 15.1004 prohibits the release of the name of the individual responding to the survey.
Responses to this questionnaire should be submitted electronically to: federalproposals@kennedy-center.org DUE NOT LATER THAN June 28, 2024 Should you have any questions concerning this survey, please submit correspondence to federalproposals@kennedy-center.org or contact Thomas Campbell at (202) 416-7997.
Section to be Completed by the Offeror.
Offeror’s Company Name: _________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________ Point of Contact__________________________________________________________ Email: __________________________________________________________________ If work was performed as a subcontractor provide Prime Contract Number: _________________________________________________________ Prime Contractor’s Name: ________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________________________ Point of Contact: Email: ___________________________________________________________ Project Title/Description of Work for which the Contractor was responsible to perform:
Form Page 1 of 5
This portion is to be completed by the Respondent:
Name and Title of Evaluator:
Company/Agency Name:
Address:
Telephone/Fax Number:
Respondent Signature:
Email: Contractor performed as Prime Contractor Subcontractor Key Personnel
1. The description of work as stated above accurately or does not accurately describe the work that was performed by Contractor being rated.
2. The contract was IAW (check all that apply): FFP T&M IDIQ SCA CBA Sole Source Subcontracting CR
3. The total dollar value awarded:
4. The total dollar value performed to date:
5. The Period of Performance awarded:______________________________________________
6. The Period of Performance performed to date:____________________________
Form Page 2 of 5
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E, G, M or U.
| E |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| G |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
M
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Marginal
| U |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective |
| N |
| Neutral |
| Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. |
Form Page 3 of 5
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The Contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
QUALITY
| 1 |
| Followed approved quality control plan, if any. |
| 2 |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 3 |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 4 |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
SCHEDULE
| 1 |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 2 |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 3 |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty, or defects, if applicable |
| 4 |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
COST CONTROL
| 1 |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 2 |
| Managed Government furnished materials and supplies effectively and not in a wasteful manner |
MANAGEMENT
| 1 |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2 |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 3 |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4 |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 5 |
| Anticipated or Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 6 |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 7 |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 8. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 9 |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 10 |
| Managed Program w/Integration & Coordination of the customer. |
| 11 |
| Recruited and Managed Key Personnel |
| 12 |
| Managed Subcontractors and Subcontracts |
| 13 |
| Established and maintained Integrity/Ethics Program |
| 14 |
| Reasonable and Cooperative in Behavior with Government personnel |
Form Page 4 of 5
| The Contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
| 1 |
| Complied with Environmental laws and regulations |
| 2 |
| Complied with Labor laws and regulations YES/NO |
| 3 |
| Complied with other regulations and codes and safety requirements YES/NO |
| 4 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? YES/NO |
| 5 |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? YES/NO |
| 6 | |
| Contract discrepancy reports (or equivalent) frequent | YES/NO |
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON ANY RATING ELEMENT CAN BE MADE BELOW, PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF E-Exceptional, G-Very Good, M-Marginal or U-Unsatisfactory.
End of Survey Form Page 5 of 5
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .