Attachment_18-_CUF_Evaluation_Worksheet__reference_only_.pdf
PDF 215 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP-25-017 PANELIST TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
- Solicitation number
- 0000039612
- Issued by
- Sacramento County, Sacramento City, West Sacramento City, California
About this file
This is a Commercially Useful Function (CUF) Evaluation and Determination Worksheet used by the California Arts Council for the RFP-25-017 Panelist Technical Assistance contract opportunity. The worksheet is designed to evaluate whether certified Small Businesses (SB) and Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises (DVBE) meet CUF compliance requirements prior to contract award. The evaluation applies to both prime contractors and subcontractors and requires assessors to verify that the supplier is responsible for executing a distinct element of work, will actually perform or manage the work involved, and that the services align with the supplier's normal business functions. The contract involves developing scalable training resources, strengthening staff readiness for statewide service delivery, and assessing opportunities to improve panel engagement and operational efficiency for grantmaking and program administration. The contract term is 12 months beginning as early as the Department of General Services Office of Legal Services approved date.
The total contract amount shall not exceed $200,000. The CUF evaluation requires affirmative responses to five compliance criteria: the supplier must be responsible for executing a distinct element of work, must actually perform or manage the work, must perform services normal to its business, must be responsible for negotiating price and determining quality and quantity of goods or materials (if applicable), and must not subcontract work beyond normal industry practices. If all five criteria receive "YES" or "N/A" responses, the supplier is deemed CUF compliant; if any question receives a "NO" response, the supplier is not CUF compliant. Bidders are strongly encouraged to monitor the Cal eProcure posting for RFP-25-017 for any updates or addenda, and should direct questions to Procurement@arts.ca.gov by the specified deadline.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
COMMERCIALLY USEFUL FUNCTION (CUF)
EVALUATION AND DETERMINATION WORKSHEET
Complete one (1) CUF Evaluation and Determination Worksheet for the portion of the contract that each certified Small Business (SB) and/or Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise (DVBE) identified on the Bidder Declaration will be performing.
CHECK THE SUPPLIER TYPE
BEING EVALUATED
PRIME SUBCONTRACTOR
OSDS # # ______________ # ________________
CIRCLE THE CERTIFICATION
TYPE
SB MB DVBE SB MB DVBE
SUPPLIER NAME
DOING BUSINESS AS (DBA)
NAME
EVALUATION DATE
SOLICITATION NUMBER
DESCRIBE THE GOODS AND /
OR SERVICES TO BE
PERFORMED BY THE
EVALUATED SUPPLIER
IS THIS SUPPLIER CUF
COMPLIANT? Yes No
EVALUATOR SIGNATURE
EVALUATOR PRINTED NAME
DIVISION/OFFICE
Note: SB and DVBE certification is not CUF compliance. CUF must be evaluated for each contract prior to award. Additional information and instructions can be found in the Commercially Useful Function Requirements Policy or the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) link within the Policy Document.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CUF EVALUATION AND DETERMINATION
Based on the documentation submitted by the bidder, answer each of the following questions for each Small Business and/or DVBE (prime or subcontractor). Sub questions have been provided to assist in identifying CUF elements for each question. Indicate whether the SB and/or DVBE supplier appears to meet each requirement by checking the appropriate box for each question.
1. SUPPLIER MUST BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EXECUTION OF A DISTINCT ELEMENT OF THE WORK.
a) The bidder has indicated on the Bidder Declaration form1 (GSPD-05-105 or GSPD-05-
106) or within the Confirmation Letter/Form (signed by the bidder and the subcontractor) that the following goods and/or services will be provided by the SB or DVBE company in relation to the scope of work (e.g. training, transportation, installation, ordering, delivery, etc.).
b) Are the goods/services the supplier is providing described in the scope of work and/or considered to be distinct elements of the contract work?
YES NO
2. SUPPLIER MUST CARRY OUT THE OBLIGATION BY ACTUALLY PERFORMING, MANAGING, OR
SUPERVISING THE WORK INVOLVED.
On the Bidder Declaration form (GSPD-05-105 or GSPD-05-106) or within the Confirmation Letter/Form (signed by the prime and the subcontractor) does the supplier commit to its obligation to actually performing, managing, and/or supervising the work?
YES NO
1 Departments may use their own forms for bids for Non-IT Services
3. PERFORMS WORK THAT IS NORMAL FOR ITS BUSINESS SERVICES AND FUNCTIONS.
a) Describe the supporting documentation either provided by the supplier (Bidder’s
Declaration, Confirmation Letter/Form, Std. Form 843) or from additional research (certifications, resumes, UNSPSC, website, marketing research, etc.) below that supports the supplier is performing work that is normal for its business services and functions (Attach supporting documents).
Supporting Information:
b) Based on the information above, do the goods/services listed in question #1 appear to be consistent with this suppliers normal activities?
YES NO
4. IS RESPONSIBLE, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCTS, INVENTORIES, MATERIALS, AND SUPPLIES
REQUIRED FOR THE CONTRACT, FOR NEGOTIATING PRICE, DETERMINING QUALITY AND
QUANTITY, ORDERING, INSTALLING, IF APPLICABLE, AND MAKING PAYMENT.
a) If this is a SERVICE with NO goods involved, check N/A and go to #5.
If Goods are involved, proceed to b).
b) Will the supplier provide products, inventories, materials and supplies required for the contract as well as perform ALL of the following duties related to the distinct element of work as stated in question #1?
1. Negotiating price
2. Determining quality and quantity
3. Ordering
4. Making payment
5. Installing (if applicable)
N/A YES NO
Rev. 10-24-2015
5. SUPPLIER IS NOT FURTHER SUBCONTRACTING A PORTION OF THE WORK THAT IS GREATER
THAN THAT EXPECTED TO BE SUBCONTRACTED BY NORMAL INDUSTRY PRACTICES.
a) Is this supplier a Prime performing all of the work?
If “Yes”, check the box and complete determine compliance If “No”, proceed to question b)
b) Based on the percentage of goods or services that will be subcontracted as stated on the Bidders Declaration and/or Confirmation Letter/Form, is this amount normal per industry standards?
YES NO
Compliance Determination
If the answer to all five (5) questions is “YES” or “N/A” (#4), the supplier is CUF compliant.
If the answer to any of the five (5) questions is “NO", the supplier is NOT CUF compliant.
Rev. 10-24-2015
| undefined: |
| undefined_2: |
| SUPPLIER NAME: |
| DOING BUSINESS AS DBA NAME: |
| EVALUATION DATE: |
| SOLICITATION NUMBER: |
| DESCRIBE THE GOODS AND OR SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY THE EVALUATED SUPPLIER: |
| EVALUATOR PRINTED NAME: |
| DIVISIONOFFICE: |
| Supporting Information: |
| Check Box2: |
| 2: Off |
| 1: Off |
| 0: Off |
| Check Box1: |
| 0: Off |
| 1: Off |
| 2: Off |
| Yes: Off |
| YES: Off |
| YES_2: Off |
| YES_3: Off |
| YES_5: Off |
| YES_4: Off |
| PRIME: Off |
| SubContract: Off |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .