The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Part A is to be completed by Offeror; the offeror’s reference is to send questionnaire to the Contract Specialist identified below. Questionnaires submitted by the offeror will NOT be reviewed.
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Mechanical IDIQ contract at Arnold AFB, TN.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at james.laney.3@us.af.mil.
JAMES B. LANEY
Contract Specialist
1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: | _____________________ |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: _____________________ | | |
C. E-MAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE NO LATER THAN
2:00 PM Central Daylight Time on 26 May 2023 TO:
| | | ATTN: James B. Laney |
| E-Mail: james.laney.3@us.af.mil | | AFTC/PZI (ARNOLD) | |
| 100 Kindel Drive, Suite A-347 | | |
Arnold AFB, TN 37389
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| Quality Assessment Rating/ Color |
| Description |
| EXCEPTIONAL (E) / BLUE |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action. |
| VERY GOOD (VG) / PURPLE |
| During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. |
Contractor took timely corrective action.
| SATISFACTORY (S) / GREEN |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| MARGINAL (M) / YELLOW |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
| UNSATISFACTORY(U) / RED |
| During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N) / WHITE |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above. Design specific questions are indicated by a * and may not be applicable to Design/Bid/Build where contractor executed project bid with 100% design provided.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| * Did the design firm address comments adequately after each review? |
| 2. |
| * How would you rate the design quality? |
| 3. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 5. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 6. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 7. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 8. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 9. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 10. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 11. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 12. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 13. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 14. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 15. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 16. |
| Responsive to contract changes and was timely in providing a response. |
| 17. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 18. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 19. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 20. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 21. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 22. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 23. |
| Was able to handle multiple projects and staffing for short-term outages/requirements. |
| 24. |
| Able to manage resources efficiently. |
| 25. |
| Reasonable cost for project(s). |
| 26. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? |
| 27. |
| * Did construction of the design result in multiple change orders due to design deficiencies? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO /NA |
| 28. |
| Were there modifications/change orders on the contract? |
| YES/NO |
29.
Were modifications/change orders warranted and a reasonable cost?
If No, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
| 30. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 32. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES/NO |
| 33. |
| Were there any delays on projects? |
If yes please explain below.
YES/NO
Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Reference Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!