Attachment 0004 - Past Performance Questionnaire Form.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Wireless AT Platform Test Set (WATS) AMENDMENT 0002 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W31P4Q21R0058
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template to be used for evaluation in awarding a federal contract. It requests information about a contractor's performance on past and current contracts within the last three years, to be completed by both the contractor and a point of contact. Questions address compliance with requirements, project management effectiveness, timeliness, cost control, and commitment to customer satisfaction. The template also provides for comments and identifies other sources of past performance information.
This federal contract opportunity is a five-year Small Business Set-Aside IDIQ for Wireless AT Platform Test Adapter Kits. The Army Materiel Command Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal is soliciting proposals due by June 3, 2021. The solicitation includes statements of work, data requirement lists, and pricing spreadsheets for spare parts in out years. This amendment provides additional details for a wireless test set procurement.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Version December 2020 1
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________ POC:________________________ Title:________________________ (Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Version December 2020 2
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Acceptable
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
Version December 2020 3
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Acceptable
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Acceptable
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .