Attach 4b - DRAFT PP Relvency Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USSOCOM Intelligence Support Services -- DRAFT RFP (H92402-24-R-0001) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H92402ISSJIII003
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
The provided document is an Excel worksheet that contains a Past and Present Performance Relevancy Matrix for evaluating potential vendors' experience on federal contract opportunities. The matrix evaluates criteria such as the size and magnitude of the scope, sub-contracting, number of FTEs, nature of work, management, recruitment and retention, problem-solving, and experience managing sub-contractors. Each criterion is assigned a relevancy rating of Very Relevant, Relevant, Somewhat Relevant, or Not Relevant based on the specifics of the contract opportunity.
The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for the USSOCOM Intelligence Support Services - Joint (ISSJ-III) contract. This contract will provide comprehensive, actionable intelligence services to USSOCOM across various intelligence disciplines, including HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, GEOINT, and targeting intelligence. The contract will require a final Top Secret Facility Clearance with approved safeguarding at the minimum Secret level. Responses to the draft RFP documents are requested by April 26, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT_RFP_Comment_Matrix_Master_22MAY2024.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 - DRAFT SOW.pdf | ||
| Attach 4c - DRAFT Letter of Commitment.pdf | ||
| Attach 5 - DRAFT Section M.pdf | ||
| Attach 3_DRAFT Pricing Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exh A - CDRLS.pdf | ||
| DRAFT RFP Comment Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00 DRAFT SF33 - H9240224R0001.pdf | ||
| Attach 4 - DRAFT Section L.pdf | ||
| Attach 4a - SF 1408.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| SIZE AND MAGNITUDE | SCOPE | Sub-Contracting | ||||||||||||||
| Number of FTEs required of the Vendor | Relevancy Rating | % of work performed by Vendor | Relevancy Rating | Nature of Work / General Scope | Relevancy Rating | Management | Relevancy Rating | Recruitment, Hiring, Retention | Relevancy Rating | Problem Solving | Relevancy Rating | In support of | Relevancy Rating | Experience managing sub-contractors, (Prime evaluated) | Relevancy Rating | Overall Effort Relevancy Rating |
| This Contract or Task Order required 100 FTEs or Greater | VR | Vendor performed 51-100% of the work | VR | Effort entails all of the following Disciplines: HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, GEOINT, and targeting intelligence | VR | This Contract required extensive external coordination regarding Security Clearances (with the majority of the work force requiring TS or above), DBA insurance, arranging/coordinating OCONUS work, travel, and SPOT. Contract required management of multiple geographical CONUS and OCONUS areas. | VR | This contract required the recruitment of highly skilled individuals (Multiple (6+) years of experience, and certifications to begin performance. Recruitment of incumbents counts towards success. Retention of organic resources also counts towards success. Contract provided retention plans that led to a low turnover rate of the most highly skilled level FTEs. | VR | PPIS included at least two instances of difficult situations (i.e. changes in mission, location, for example) in which quick actions were required. Actions were appropriate to the problem. Outcomes were clearly defined, success was achieved. | VR | In direct support of SOF, TSOCs, Components | VR | For this contract submission, the vendor managed subcontracts and clearly defined the roles, responsibilities, relationship and coordination required to ensure contract continutiy and success. Subcontracting was similar to this effort. | VR |
| This Contractor or Task Order required 47-99 FTEs | R | Vendor performed 30-50% of the work | R | Effort entails most of the following: HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, GEOINT, and targeting intelligence | R | This Contract required some external Coordination regarding Security Clearances, (primarily at the secret but few required at the TS level), )(few people required to travel OCONUS), coordination for OCONUS work, SPOT. Contract required management of multiple geographical CONUS areas. | R | This contract required the recruitment of medium skilled individuals (~5 years of experience, with certifications) to begin performance. Recruitment of incumbents counts towards success. Retention of organic resources is counts towards success. Contract provided retention plans that led to a low turnover rate of the most highly performing individuals. | R | Contract included an instance of difficult situations in which quick reaction was required by the offeror. Processes were appropriate to the problem. Outcome was clearly defined, success was achieved. | R | In support of Conventional Forces (J7- J5), Training Commands, OGAs | R | For this contract submission, the vendor managed subcontracts that were similar to this effort, but did not define the roles, responsibilities, relationship and coordination required to ensure contract continutiy and success. Subcontracting was similar to this effort. | R |
| This Contract or Task Order required 31-46 FTEs | SR | Vendor performed 20-29% of the work | SR | Effort entails two of the following: HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, GEOINT, and targeting intelligence. | SR | This Contract required external Coordination regarding clearances, with few numbers of FTEs requiring secret level. Effort did not require DBA, SPOT, or any OCONUS work. Contract did not require multiple geographical CONUS areas. | SR | This contract required the recruitment of moderately skilled individuals (~3 years, with some certifications required) to begin performance. Recruitment of incumbents counts towards success. Retention of organic resources is counts towards success. Contract provided retention plans that led to a low turnover rate of the most highly performing individuals. | SR | Contract included an instance of situation in which a change/reaction was required of the offeror. Processes were described, outcomes were listed. Situtation was not difficult, somewhat common | SR | Supported Commercial Enterprises | SR | For this contract submission, the vendor managed subcontracts that were not similar to this effort, however, roles, responsibilities, relationship and coordination required were defined. | SR |
| This Contract or Task Order required Less than 30 FTEs | NR | Vendor performed Less than 20% | NR | Effort entails one of the following: HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, GEOINT, and targeting intelligence. | NR | This Contract did not require coordination regarding clearances, no additional insurance required, no OCONUS travel. Performance was in one location | NR | This contract required the recruitment of low skilled individuals (novice, no certifications, entry level) to begin performance. Recruitment of incumbents counts towards success. Retention of organic resources is counts towards success. Contract provided retention plans that led to a low turnover rate of the most highly performing individuals. | NR | Contract performance did not require a situation in which a change or quick reaction, large or small, was required. | NR | No specified support of all of the above i.e. | NR | For this contract submission, the vendor did not managed subcontracts or managed subcontracts but failed to decribe their similarity to this effort, and no mention of roles, responsibilities, relationship and coordination | NR |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .