Attach 4 Past_Performance_Report_Form.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- P222 Site Security Manager Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0018925Q0065
About this file
This is a Past Performance Report Form template to be completed by previous customers/agencies to evaluate a contractor's performance history. The form is specifically for the P222 Site Security Manager opportunity (N0018925Q0065) being solicited by Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Contracting Department.
The questionnaire requests detailed information about both the contractor being evaluated and the evaluating agency, including contract numbers, amounts, and contact information. It focuses on six key performance areas: recruiting capabilities, workforce retention, quality of contract requirement fulfillment, timeliness of deliverables, contractor responsiveness, and cost control. The form includes sections for rating customer satisfaction, identifying instances of rework or deficiencies, assessing problem resolution, and providing overall strengths and weaknesses. Completed forms must be returned directly to Elysia Allen at FLCN by the solicitation due date.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N0018925Q00650002 SF30 Amend 2.pdf | ||
| N0018925Q00650001 SF30 Amend 1.pdf | ||
| Attach 5 Questions Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| N0018925Q0065 SF 1449.pdf | ||
| Attach 1 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attach 3 Past_Performance_Information_Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attach 2 DD-254 - P-222 SSM.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contractor Performance Customer Input Sheet/Questionnaire
Complete and return NLT the due date of the solicitation to:
Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Contracting Department, Attn: Elysia Allen Email: elysia.m.allen2.civ@us.navy.mil
On behalf of :
| Company's Name: | _________________________________ | |
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | |
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract/Purchase Order No.: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Amount: | _________________________________ | |
| Contract Type: | _________________________________ | |
| Period of Performance: | _________________________________ | |
| Business Address: | _________________________________ | |
| _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | ||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the U.S. Naval Supply System (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Completed by :
| Command/Company’s Name: | _________________________________ | ||
| POC/Title/Position: | _________________________________ | ||
| Email Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| Address: | _________________________________ | ||
| _________________________________ | |||
| _________________________________ | |||
| Phone Number: | _________________________________ |
PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY RATING TABLE
Quality:
1. Recruiting: The offeror’s demonstrated ability to recruit personnel with the skill sets, qualifications/certifications, experience and security clearance required of the contract. Provide additional comments if necessary.
2. Retention: The offeror’s demonstrated ability to maintain a stable workforce.
3. Quality/Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
4. Quality/Timeliness.
a. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
b. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
5. Quality/Contractor Responsiveness. The offeror’s demonstrated ability to:
a. respond to customer concerns
b. isolate and resolve problems
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
c. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.)
6. Additional Observations/Information
a. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
b. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
c. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
d. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .